Skip to main content
Log in

Economic subsystems and the occupational structure: A comparison of Hungary and the United States

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

This article proposes a new way of looking at social inequality in socialist and nonsocialist societies. In the first section, a conceptual framework for recovering houseworkers for class analysis is introduced, and a historically-based argument for representing them in the occupational structure is advanced. The second section reviews the evolution of social cleavages from the preindustrial era to the present day and discusses the implications of using the same occupational classification scheme to describe both socialist and nonsocialist societies. This occupational classification is illustrated in the concluding section of the paper by reanalyzing data from Hungary and the United States. The results provide new insights into the structure of gender-based inequalities and the effects of socialism on the occupational division of labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aminzade, Ronald, andRandy Hodson 1982 “Social mobility in a mid-nineteenth century French city.” American Sociological Review 47:441–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 Fertility. Female Employment, and Policy Measures in Hungary. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985 “Hungary.” In Valentina Bodrova and Richard Anker (eds.), Working Women in Socialist Countries. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1962 “The breakup of family capitalism.” In The End of Ideology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1976 The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, Suzanne M., andDaphne Spain 1980 American Women in Transition. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M., andOtis Dudley Duncan 1967 The American Occupational Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böröcz, József 1989 “Mapping the class structures of state socialism in East-Central Europe.” In Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 8:279–309. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, Harry 1974 Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael 1979 Manufacturing Consent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, James 1962 The Managerial Revolution. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Pamela S., andDonald J. Treiman 1981 “The Dictionary of Occupational Titles as a source of occupational data.” American Sociological Review 46:253–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, Andrew J. 1981 Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, Tony 1974 State Capitalism in Russia. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, Robert W., andT. H. Irving 1973 “Yes, Virginia, there is a ruling class.” In Henry Meyer and Helen Nelson (eds.), Australian Politics: 31–47. Melbourne: Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, Michel 1964 The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, Ralf 1959 Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Margery W. 1982 Woman's Place Is at the Typewriter. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, James Allen, andTom W. Smith 1987 General Social Survey, 1972–1987 [machine readable data file]. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center, producer, 1987; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut, distributor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kingsley 1984 “Wives and work: The sex role revolution and its consequences.” Population and Development Review 10:397–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Kingsley, andWilbert E. Moore 1966 “Some principles of stratification.” In Reinhard Bendix and Seymour M. Lipset (eds.), Class, Status, and Power: 47–52. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djilas, Milovan 1957 The New Class. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Richard 1979 Contested Terrain. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert 1984 “Social class of men, women, and families.” Sociology 18:500–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert, andJohn H. Goldthorpe 1988 “Women at class crossroads: A critical note.” Sociology 22:545–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert, John H. Goldthorpe, andLucienne Portocarero 1979 “Intragenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France, and Sweden.” British Journal of Sociology 30:415–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherman, David L., andRobert M. Hauser 1978 Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferge, Zsuzsa 1983 “Változik-e manapság a nők helyzete?” (Has the situation of women changed lately?) In A. Olajos (ed.), Tanulmányok a Női Munkáról (Studies on Women's Work): 230–255. Budapest: Kossuth Könyvkiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Mary Frank, andSharlene Hesse-Biber 1984 Women at Work. New York: Mayfield Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Victor R. 1988 Women's Quest for Economic Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagliani, Giorgio 1981 “How many working classes?” American Journal of Sociology 87:259–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony 1973 The Class Structure of the Advanced Industrial Societies. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 Social Mobillty and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Women and class analysis: In defense of the conventional view.” Sociology 17:465–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alwin W. 1979 The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraszti, Miklós 1978 A Worker in a Worker's State. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 Social Mobility and Life History Survey, 1983 [machine readable data file]. Budapest: Hungarian Central Statistical Office, producer and distributor.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 Társadalmi Mobilitás és Presztizs (Social Mobility and Prestige). Budapest: Központi Statisztikai Hivatal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, Michael, andWilliam Brustein 1980 “Regional modes of production and patterns of state formation in Western Europe.” American Journal of Sociology 85:1061–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Terence J. 1972 Professions and Power. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss 1977 Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Michael B., Michael J. Doucet, andMark J. Stern 1982 The Social Organization of Early Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 Women Have Always Worked. New York: Feminist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 Out to Work: A History of Wage-Earning Women in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrád, Georg, andIván Szelényi 1979 The Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986a “The Hungarian reform progress: Visions, hopes, and reality.” Journal of Economic Literature 24:1687–1737.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986b Contradictions and Dilemmas: Studies on the Socialist Economy and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Magali Sarfatti 1977 The Rise of Professionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazerson, Mark H. 1988 “Organizational growth of small firms: An outcome of markets and hierarchies?” American Sociological Review 53:330–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Gerda 1979 “Just a housewife.” In Gerda Lerner (ed.), The Majority Finds Its Past: 129–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, David 1958 The Blackcoated Worker. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, Stephen 1982 “What do the bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production.” In Anthony Giddens and David Held (eds.), Classes, Power, and Conflict: 285–298. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Márkus, György 1983 “Corporate property and command economy.” In Ferenc Fehér, Aǵnes Heller, and György Márkus (eds.), Dictatorship Over Needs: 45–105. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl 1952 Manifesto of the Communist Party. (1848*) Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthaei, Julie A. 1982 An Economic History of Women in America. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, Steven D., Barbara D. Melber, John O. G. Billy, Denise M. Zimmerle, Linda D. Winges, andTerry R. Johnson 1988 The Changing Lives of American Women. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., Francisco O. Ramirez, Henry A. Walker, Nancy Langton, andSorca M. O'Connor 1988 “The state and the institutionalization of the relations between women and children.” In Sanford M. Dornbusch and Myra H. Strober (eds.), Feminism, Children: 137–160, and the New Families. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright 1951 White Collar. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Wilbert E. 1963 Social Change. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orolin, Zsuzsa 1983 “A nők foglalkoztatásának szoiálpolitikai vonatkozásai” (The sociopolitical consequences of women's employment). In A. Olajos (ed.), Tanulmányok női Munkáról (Studies on Women's Work): 53–65. Budapest: Kossuth Könyvkadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1971 Class Inequality and Political Order. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott, andRobert F. Bales 1955 Family, Socialization, and Interaction Process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peers, Jo 1985 “Workers by the hand and womb: Soviet women and the demographic crisis.” In Barbara Holland (ed.), Soviet Sisterhood. Bloomington, INkk: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, Michael J., andCharles F. Sabel 1984 The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro, andSaskia Sassen-Koob 1987 “Making it underground: Comparative material on the informal sector in Western market economies.” American Journal of Sociology 93:30–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, Patricia A. 1985 Gender and Work. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, Marilyn, andSzonja Szelényi 1989 “Socialist transformation and gender inequality: Women in the German Democratic Republic and in Hungary.” In D. Childs, T. A. Baylis, and M. Rueschemeyer (eds.), East Germany in Comparative Perspective: 81–109. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachtman, Max 1962 The Bureaucratic Revolution. New York: Donald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkus, Albert A., andRudolf Andorka 1982 “Inequalities in educational attainment in Hungary, 1923–1973.” American Sociological Review 47:740–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, Paul 1982 The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Katherine 1981 “The origins of job structures in the steel industry.” In Mary Zey-Ferrell and Michael Aiken (eds.), Complex Organizations: Critical Perspectives: 349–381. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szelényi, Iván 1988 Socialist Entrepreneurs: Embourqeoisement in Rural Hungary. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 “Social inequality and party membership: Patterns of recruitment into the Hungarian Socialist Workers' Party.” American Sociological Review 52:559–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988 Social mobility and class structure in Hungary and the United States.” Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, No. 8826077.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szelényi, Szonja, and Karen E. Aschaffenburg forthcoming “Inequalities in educational opportunity: Changes in socialist Hungary.” In Y. Shavit and H. Blossfeld (eds.), Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Stratification in Thirteen Countries. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Teitelbaum, Michael S., andJay M. Winter 1985 Fear of Population Decline. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles 1981 As Sociology Meets History. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Louise A., andJoan W. Scott 1978 Women, Work, and Family. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, Donald J. 1970 “Industrialization and social stratification.” In Edward O. Laumann (ed.), Social Stratification: 207–234. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turgonyi, Júlia, andZsuzsa Ferge 1969 Az Ipari Munkasnők Munka- és Életkörülményei (The Work- and Life-Situations of Female Industrial Workers). Budapest: Kossuth Könyvkiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census 1971 Alphabetical Index of Industries and Occupations, 1970 Census of Population. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor 1977 Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utasi, Agnes 1984 “Life styles, demand levels, and Hungary's elite.” In Rudolf Andorka and Tamás Kolosi (eds.), Stratification and Inequality: 137–156. Budapest: Institute for Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max 1978 Economy and Society, (1922). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolchik, Sharon L., andAlfred G. Meyer 1985 Women, State, and Party in Eastern Europe. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978 Class, Crisis, and the State. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 Class Structure and Income Determination. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “Class and occupation.” Theory and Society 9:177–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985 Classes. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik O., David Hachen, Cynthia Costello, andJoey Sprague 1982 “The American class structure.” American Sociological Review 47:709–726.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szelényi, S. Economic subsystems and the occupational structure: A comparison of Hungary and the United States. Sociol Forum 7, 563–586 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112316

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112316

Key words

Navigation