Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variation in high-protein pea

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Of the four high-protein genotypes isolated after induced mutations and breeding, two exhibited height and yield nearly equal to the Bonneville pea variety, but matured later. Their stability for protein yield over generations and locations, aminogram pattern and nutritional value remains to be determined. Path analysis and correlations indicate that developing a short-statured pea with higher yield and increased protein content may not be possible with the available breeding methods and germ plasm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams G (1975) Mutations affecting protein characters in wheat. In: Proc symp seed protein improvement using nuclear techniques. Vienna: IAEA, pp 35–37

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benken II (1966) A biochemical study of agro-ecological groups of peas. Field Crop Abstr 20:340

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blixt S (1979) Natural and induced variability for seed protein in temperate legumes. In: Proc symp seed protein improvement in cereals and grain legumes, vol 2. Vienna: IAEA, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breese EL (1969) The measurement and significance of genotype-environment interaction in grasses. Heredity 24:27–44

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bressani R, Elias LG (1979) The world protein and nutritional situation. In: Proc symp seed protein improvement in cereals and grain legumes, vol 1. Vienna: IAEA, pp 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burton GW (1952) Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proc 6th Int Grassland Congr 1:119–134

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dewey DR, Lu KH (1959) A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agron J 51:515–518

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eberhart SA, Russell J (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Esh GC, De TS, Basu VP (1959) Influence of genetic strain and environment on protein content of pulses. Science 129:148

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher RA (1936) Statistical methods for research workers, ch 6. London: Oliver and Boyd

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gottschalk W (1978) Gene-ecological studies inPisum mutants and recombinants. Genetika (Beograd) 10:43–61

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gottschalk W, Kaul MLH (1980) Gene-ecological investigations inPisum mutants. II. Comparative performance in Germany and North India. Theor Appl Genet 56:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gottschalk W, Müller HP, Wolff G (1976) Further investigation on the genetic control of seed protein production inPisum mutants. In: Proc symp evaluation of seed protein alterations by mutation breeding. Vienna: IAEA, pp 157–177

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gottschalk W, Wolff G (1977) Problems of mutation breeding inPisum. Legume Res 1:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hanson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE (1956) Biometrical studies of yield in segregating population of Korean lespendeza. Agron J 48:268–272

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE (1955) Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J 47:314–318

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaul MLH (1977) Radiation-genetic studies in garden pea. I. Two early flowering and ripening induced mutants. Curr Sci 46:198–200

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaul MLH (1978) Mutation genetic studies in rice. I. Induced mutations of breeding value. Gentika (Beograd) 8:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaul MLH (1980) Radiations genetic studies in garden pea. XI. Non-allelism of early flowering mutants and heterosis. Z Pflanzenzuecht 84:192–200

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaul MLH (1980) Seed protein variability in rice. Z Pflanzenzuecht 84:302–312

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kaul MLH, Garg R (1982) Radiation-genetic studies in garden pea. XI. Agronomic performance and correlations. Z Pflanzenzuecht 88:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaul MLH, Matta NK (1976) Radiation-genetic studies in garden pea. III. Morphological variability, intercorrelations and genetic parameters. Genetika 8:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lush JL (1949) Animal breeding plans, 3rd edn. Ames IA: Collegiate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mather K, Jinks JL (1977) Introduction to biometrical genetics. London: Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  25. Millerd A (1975) Biochemistry of legume seed proteins. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 26:53–72

    Google Scholar 

  26. Millerd A, Thomson JA, Schroeder HE (1978) Cotyledonary storage protein inPisum sativum. III. Patterns of accumulation during development. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:519–534

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moda DJ, Robinson HF (1959) Pleiotropism and the genetic variance. Biometrics 15:518–537

    Google Scholar 

  28. Muller HP, Gottschalk W (1978) Gene-ecological investigations on the protein production of differentPisum genotypes. In: Proc symp seed protein improvement by nuclear techniques. Vienna: IAEA, pp 301–314

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pandey S, Gritton ET (1975) Genotypic and phenotypic variances and correlations in peas. Crop Sci 15:353–356

    Google Scholar 

  30. Paroda RS, Hayes JD (1971) An investigation of genotype-environment interaction for rate of ear emergence in spring barley. Heredity 26:157–175

    Google Scholar 

  31. Perkins JM, Jinks JL (1968) Environmental and genotype environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23:339–356

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pesola VA (1955) Protein content of field pea seeds as a varietal character. Chem Abstr 49:7609

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rendel JM (1963) Correlation between the number of scuteller and abdominal bristles inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics 48:391–408

    Google Scholar 

  34. Robbelen G (1979) The challenge of breeding for improved protein crops. In: Proc symp seed protein improvement in cereals and grain legumes, vol 1. Vienna: IAEA, pp 27–42

    Google Scholar 

  35. Samuel CJA, Hill J, Breese EL, Daires A (1970) Assessing and predicting environmental response inLolium perrene. J Agric Sci 75:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sigurbjornsson B (1979) A joint FAO/IAEA/GSP programme on grain protein improvement. In: Proc symp seed protein improvement incereals and grain legumes. Vienna: IAEA, pp 387–421

    Google Scholar 

  37. Slinkard AE (1980) Production, utilization and marketing of field peas. Final Rep Agric Can, pp 1–99

  38. Thomson JA, Millerd A, Schroeder HE (1979) Genotype-dependent patterns of accumulation of seed storage proteins inPisum. In: Proc symp seed protein improvement in cereals and grain legumes, vol 1. Vienna: IAEA, pp 231–240

    Google Scholar 

  39. Thomson JA, Schroeder HE (1978) Cotyledonary storage proteins inPisum sativum. II. Hereditary variation in components of legumin and vicilin fractions. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:281–294

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaul, M.L.H. Genetic variation in high-protein pea. Plant Food Hum Nutr 31, 307–317 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108638

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108638

Key words

Navigation