Skip to main content
Log in

Production of neosolaniol byFusarium tumidum

  • Mycotoxicoses And Mycotoxins
  • Published:
Mycopathologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extracts from autoclaved maize culture ofFusarium tumidum strain R-5823 were toxic towardsArtemia salina. Bioassay-guided fractionation of the organic extract led to the isolation of the toxic compound that was identified as the trichothecene toxin neosolaniol (NEOS) by1H,13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and low-resolution electronic impact mass spectrometry. The amount of NEOS produced by the strain R-5823 was 300 mg/kg maize culture. NEOS was also detected by HPLC in cultures of four out of seven additional strains ofF. tumidum andGibberella tumida with different origin, in amounts ranging from 1 to 311 mg/kg. This is the first report on the production of a trichothecene toxin byF. tumidum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sherbakoff CD. An examination ofFusaria in the herbarium of the Pathological Collections, Bureau of Plant Industry, US Department of Agriculture. Phytopathology 1928; 18: 148–49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bilai VI. Fusarii. Kiev: Izd. Akad. Nauk. Ukrain, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson PE, Toussoun TA, Marasas WFO.Fusarium Species — An Illustated Manual For Identification. University Park/London: The Pennsylvania State Univ. Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broadhurst PG, Johnston PR.Gibberella tumida sp. nov. — teleomorph ofFusarium tumidum from gorse in New Zealand. Mycol Res 1994; 98(7): 729–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Johnston P. International Bioherbicide Group News 1993; 2 (2): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gerlach W, Nirenberg H. The genusFusarium — A pictorial atlas. Berlin-Dahlem: Biologische Bundesanstalt für Landund Forstwirtschaft, 1982 (Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft; vol 209).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nirenberg HI. A simplified method for identifyingFusarium spp. occurring on wheat. Can J Bot 1981; 59: 1599–609.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Logrieco A, Moretti A, Altmore C, Bottalico A, Carbonell Torres E. Occurrence and toxicity ofFusarium subglutinans from Peruvian maize. Mycopathologia 1993; 122: 185–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Frisvald JC. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of profiles of mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites. Chrom 1987; 19 (337): 333–47.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bottalico A, Logrieco A, Visconti A.Fusarium species and their mycotoxins in infected cereals in the field and in stored grains. In: Chelkowski J, ed.Fusarium: Mycotoxins Taxonomy and Pathogenicity. Amsterdam/London/New York/Tokyo: Elsevier, 1989: 85–119.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher NL, Burgess LW, Toussoun TA, Nelson PE. Carnation leaves as a substrate and for preserving cultures ofFusarium species. Phytopathology 1982; 72: 151–53.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Savard ME, Blackwell BA, Greenhalgh R. An1H nuclear magnetic resonance study of derivatives of 3-hydroxy-12,13-epoxytrichothec-9-enes. Can J Chem 1987; 65: 2254–62.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Greenhalgh R, Blackwell BA, Savard ME. The NMR of trichothecenes and related fungal metabolites. Tetrahedron 1988; 45: 2373–383.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ueno Y, ed. Trichothecenes. Chemical, Biological and Toxicological Aspects. Amsterdam/London/New York/Tokyo: Elsevier, 1983 (Developments in Food Science, vol 4).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Samples D, Hill DW, Bridges CH, Camp BJ. Isolation of a mycotoxin (roridin A) fromPhomopsis spp. Vet Hum Toxicol 1984; 26: 21–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ueno Y, Ishii K. Chemical and biological properties of trichothecenes fromFusarium sporotrichioides. In: Lacey J, ed. Trichothecenes and Other Mycotoxins. Chichester/New York/Brisbane/Toronto/Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, 1985: 307–16.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brian PW, Dawkins AW, Grove JF, Hemming HG, Lowe D, Norris GLF. Phytotoxic compounds produced byFusarium equiseti. J Exp Bot 1961; 12: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marasas WFO, Smalley EB, Bamburg JR, Strong FM. Phytotoxicity of T-2 toxin produced byFusarium tricinctum. Phytopathology 1971; 61: 1488–91.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lansden JA, Cole RJ, Dorner JW, Cox RH, Cutler HG, Clark JD. A new trichothecene mycotoxin isolated fromFusarium tricinctum. J Agric Food Chem 1978; 26: 246–49.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grove JF. Phytotoxic compounds produced byFusarium equiseti. Part 6. J Chem Soc (C) 1970: 378–79.

  21. Wakulinski W. Phytotoxicity ofFusarium metabolites in relation to pathogenicity. In: Chelkowski J, ed.Fusarium: Mycotoxins, Taxonomy and Pathogenicity. Amsterdam/London/New York/Tokyo: Elsevier, 1989: 257–68.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marasas WFO, Nelson PE, Toussoun TA. ToxigenicFusarium species. Identity and Mycotoxicology. University Park/London: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harwig J, Scott PM, Stoltz DR, Blanchfield BJ. Toxins of molds from decaying tomato fruit. Appl Environ Microbiol 1979; 38: 267–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Desjardins AE, Plattner RD. Trichothecene toxin production by strains ofGibberella pulicaris (Fusarium sambucinum) in liquid culture and in potato tubers. J Agric Food Chem 1989; 37: 388–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Altomare, C., Ritieni, A., Perrone, G. et al. Production of neosolaniol byFusarium tumidum . Mycopathologia 130, 179–184 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01103102

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01103102

Key words

Navigation