Skip to main content
Log in

Singaporean gifted adolescents under scrutiny: The gender factor

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the sex-role problems of gifted adolescents rarely lifts its sight beyond Western developed countries, making generalizations to the Third World suspect. The present study, by exploring the relationship between gender and adjustment among gifted adolescents in Singapore, hopes to extend the consideration of developmental sex-role issues to a society different from the West. Specifically, it reports that Singaporean gifted girls, like some of their Western counterparts, had difficulty in reconciling their giftedness with societal notions of femininity.

Conceivably, this conflict placed them on the threshold of stress, leaving them more vulnerable than the gifted boys to adjustment problems. In addition, having internalized the gender stereotypic view that academic excellence was less important to them than to the boys, the gifted girls might inadvertently put ceilings on their own achievements. The paper concludes with several remedies for educators, counsellors, and parents to help gifted girls embark upon their road to self-fulfilment.

Zusammenfassung

Forschungen über die Probleme begabter Jugendlicher bezüglich geschlechtsspezifischer Rollen erfassen selten Zielgruppen außerhalb der entwickelten westlichen Länder. Demnach wird jede Übertragung auf die dritte Welt fragwürdig. Diese Studie beabsichtigt, mit einer Untersuchung über die Beziehungen zwischen Geschlecht und Anpassungsfähigkeit unter begabten Jugendlichen in Singapur, den Kontext der Debatte über entwicklungsbezogene geschlechtsspezifische Rollen auf eine nicht-westliche Gesellschaft zu erweitern. Insbesondere wird berichtet, daß begabte singapurische Mädchen es ebenso wie westliche Mädchen schwierig finden, ihre Begabtheit mit gesellschaftsüblichen Begriffen der Weiblichkeit zu vereinbaren. Es wäre durchaus möglich, daß dieser Konflikt sie bis an die Schwelle des Stresses bringt, so daß sie für Anpassungsprobleme anfälliger als begabte Jungen sind. Indem sie die geschlechtstypische Ansicht verinnerlichen, daß wissenschaftlicher Erfolg für sie weniger bedeutsam ist als für Jungen, könnten die begabten Mädchen ihren eigenen Leistungen unbewußt Grenzen setzen. Der Artikel endet mit verschiedenen Vorschlägen, wie Pädagogen, Berater und Eltern begabter Mädchen dazu beitragen könnten, daß diese Mädchen zu ihrer Selbsterfüllung finden.

Résumé

La recherche sur les problèmes liés au rôle des sexes des adolescents doués porte rarement son regard au-delà des pays industrialisés occidentaux, rendant les généralisations au Tiers Monde suspectes. En étudiant le rapport entre les sexes et l'adaptation chez les adolescents talentueux de Singapour, la présente étude espère étendre l'examen des problèmes de développement liés au rôle des sexes à une société différente de celles du monde occidental. En particulier, elle relate que les filles douées de Singapour, comme certaines de leurs homologues occidentales, ont des difficultés à concilier leur talent avec les notions sociales de fémininité. II est concevable que ce conflit les ait mises sous pression, les rendant ainsi plus vulnérables que les garçons doués aux problèmes d'adaptation. Par ailleurs, ayant assimilé le point de vue stéréotypé des sexes selon lequel l'excellence scolaire est moins importante pour elles que pour les garçons, il se peut que les filles douées fixent, par inadvertance, un plafond à leurs propres performances. Cet article conclut en proposant quelques remèdes aux éducateurs, conseillers et aux parents pour aider les filles capables à s'engager dans la voie qui leur permettra de s'accomplir.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.V. 1974. Psychological Determinants. In: Kundsin, R.B., ed.,Women and Success: The Anatomy of Achievement (200–207). New York: William Morrow and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelino, H.R. 1979. Gifted and Talented Children and Youth. In: Swanson, M. and Willis, D.J., eds.,Understanding Exceptional Children and Youth (98–127). New York: Rand McNally College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, K.D. and Denny, T. 1984. Academic Achievement — A View from the Top: The Lives of High School Valedictorians and Salutatorians. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, New Orleans, LA.

  • Birnbaum, J.A. 1975. Life Patterns and Self-Esteem in Gifted Family-Oriented and Career-Committed Women. In: Mednick, M.T.S., Tangri, S.S. and Hoffman, L.W., eds.,Women and Achievement. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brode, D.S. 1980. Group Dynamics with Gifted Adolescents.Gifted Child Today Nov/Dec: 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broverman, I.K., Vogel, S.R., Broverman, D.M., Clarkson, F.E. and Rosenkrantz, P.S. 1972. Sex Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal.Journal of Social Issues 28: 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownfair, J.J. 1952. Stability of the Self-Concept as a Dimension of Personality.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47: 597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, J.J., Steele, J. and Abeles, R.P. 1980. Sex Differences in Realization of Individual Potential for Achievement.Journal of Vocational Behavior 17: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casserly, P.L. 1979. Helping Young Women Take Math and Science Seriously in School. In: Colangelo, N. and Zaffran, R.T., eds.,New Voices in Counseling the Gifted (346–369). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaikin, A. and Derlega, V. 1974.Self Disclosure. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, L. 1955.Psychology of Adolescents. New York: Reinhart and Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coopersmith, S. 1967.The Antecedents of Self-Esteem. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. 1978.Stress. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozby, P.C. 1973. Self-Disclosure: A Literature Review.Psychological Bulletin 73: 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, V.J., Katovsky, W. and Crandall, V.C. 1965. Children's Belief in Their Own Control of Reinforcement in Intellectual-Academic Situations.Child Development 36: 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, M.L. and Taebel, K. 1976. Sex-Role Stereotyping is Alive and Well in Sixth-Graders.Elementary School Journal 76: 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. 1961. Alienation: Its Meaning and Measurement.American Sociological Review 26: 753–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delias, M. and Gaier, E.L. 1975. The Self and Adolescent Identity in Women: Options and Implications.Adolescence 10: 399–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvan, E. and Adelson, J. 1966.The Adolescent Experience. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvan, E. 1970. New Sources of Conflict in Adolescence. In: Bardwick, J. et al., eds.,Feminine Personality and Conflict. Belmont, California: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvan, E. 1979. Sex Role Learning. In: Coleman, J., ed.,The School Years. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, L.H. 1981. Identification of the Academically Gifted.American Psychologist 36: 1103–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, T. 1978. Locus of Control as a Mediator of Adaptive Behavior in Children and Adolescents.Canadian Psychological Review 19: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W.R. and Herb, T.R. 1974. Stress and Mental Illness among the Young: A Comparison of the Sexes.Social Forces 53: 256–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttentag, M. and Bray, H. 1976.Undoing Sex Role Stereotypes. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, H.M. 1981. Blabbermouths and Clams: Sex differences in Self-Disclosure in Same-Sex and Cross-Sex Friendship Dyads.Psychology of Women Quarterly 5(3): 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W.W. 1978. Children and their Friends. In: McGurk, H., ed.,Issues in Childhood Social Development (43–54). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L.W. 1974. The Professional Woman as Mother. In: Kundsin, R.B., ed.,Women and Success: The Anatomy of Achievement (222–228). New York: William Morrow and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L.W. 1977. Fear of Success in 1965 and 1974: A Follow-Up Study.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 45: 310–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, M.S. 1969. Fail: Bright Women.Psychology Today 3: 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J.S. and Rosenberg, B.G. 1980.Half the Human Experience. Toronto: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, F. 1981. The 1946–1968 Presidential Scholars: A Follow-Up Study.Exceptional Children 48(2): 164–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B.A. 1985.Smart Girls, Gifted Women. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psychological.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriedberg, G., Butcher, A.L. and White, K.M. 1978. Vocational Role Choice in Second- and Sixth-Grade Children.Sex Roles 4: 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzman, K.A. 1980. A Study of School Attitudes, Peer Acceptance, and Personality of Creative Adolescents. In: Renzulli, J.S. and Stoddard, E.P., eds.,Gifted and Talented Education in Perspective. Reston, Virginia: The Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavach, J.F. and Lanier, H.B. 1975. The Motive to Avoid Success in 7th, 8th, 9th, and 10th Grade High-Achieving Girls.The Journal of Educational Research 68: 216–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H.M. 1982.Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lever, J. 1978. Sex Differences in the Complexity of Children's Play.American Sociological Review 43: 471–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R.A. 1978. Emotional Intimacy among Men.Journal of Social Issues 34(1): 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locksley, A. and Douvan, E. 1979. Problem Behavior in Adolescents. In: Gomberg, E. and Frank, V., eds.,Gender and Disordered Behavior. New York: Brunner-Mazer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, R.C. and Jay, G. 1987. Self-Concept in Gifted Children: Differential Impact in Boys and Girls.Gifted Child Quarterly 31(1): 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looft, W.R. 1971. Sex Differences in the Expression of Vocational Aspirations by Elementary School Children.Developmental Psychology 5: 366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. and Jacklin, C. 1974.The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, E.E. 1972.Counseling Girls and Women over the Life Span (National Vocational Guidance Association Monograph). Washington, DC: National Vocational Guidance Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. 1935. Sex and Achievement.Forum 94: 302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J.L., Parsons, J.E., Kaczala, C.M., Goff, S.B. and Futterman, R. 1982. Sex Differences in Math Achievement: Toward a Model of Academic Choice.Psychological Bulletin 91: 324–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, R. 1963. Alienation, Race and Education.American Sociological Review 28: 973–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek. 1981. Just How the Sexes Differ. May 18: 72–83.

  • Nowicki, S. Jr. and Strickland, B.R. 1972. A Locus of Control Scale for Children.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 40: 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papalia, D.E. and Tennent, S.S. 1975. Vocational Aspirations in Preschoolers: A Manifestation of Early Sex Role Stereotyping.Sex Roles 1: 197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J.E., Adler, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J.L. and Midgley, C. 1983. General Model of Academic Choice. In: J.T. Spence, ed.,Perspectives on Achievement and Achievement Motivation. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perino, S.C. and Perino, J. 1981.Parenting the Gifted. New York: R.R. Bowker Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, S.R. 1980. Sex-Role Socialization in a Transitional Society.International Journal of Sociology of the Family 10: 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J.M. 1981. Adult Friendships. In: Duck, S. and Gilmour, R., eds.,Personal Relationships, Vol. 2 (205–230). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S.M. 1987. We Can't Change What We Don't Recognize: Understanding the Special Needs of Gifted Females.Gifted Child Quarterly 31(2): 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C.R. and Paget, K.D. 1981. Factor Analysis of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale for Blacks, Whites, and Females with a National Normative Sample.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 49: 352–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C.R. and Richmond, B.O. 1979. Factor Structure and Construct Validity of What I Think and Feel: A Revised Measure of Children's Manifest Anxiety.Journal of Personality Assessment 43: 281–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C.R. and Richmond, B.O. 1985.The Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J.P. and Shaver, P.R. 1975.Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. Michigan: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenstein, J.M. and Glickhauf-Hughes, C. 1979. Career and Lifestyle Determinants of Gifted Women. In: Colangelo, N. and Zaffran, R.T., eds.,New Voices in Counseling the Gifted. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenstein, J., Pfleger, L. and Colangelo, N. 1977. Career Development Needs of the Gifted: Special Considerations for Gifted Women.Gifted Child Quarterly 20: 340–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B.C. and Aneshensel, C.S. 1978. Sex Differences in the Educational-Occupational Expectation Process.Social Forces 57: 164–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z. and Shenker, S. 1978. Friendship, Proximity, and Self-Disclosure.Journal of Personality 46(1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z. 1980.Children's Friendships. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, M. and Sadker, D. 1985. Sexism in the Schoolroom of the 80's.Psychology Today 19(3): 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, C.E. 1980. A Psychological Study of Ten Exceptionally Creative Adolescent Girls. In: Renzulli, J.S. and Stoddard, E.P., eds.,Gifted and Talented Education in Perspective. Reston, Virginia: The Council for Exceptional Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholwinski, E. and Reynolds, C.R. 1985. Dimensions of Anxiety among High IQ Children.Gifted Child Quarterly 29(3): 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, L.L. 1980. Advocacy for the Neglected Gifted Females.Gifted Child Quarterly 24(3): 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, P.S. and Barbee, A.H. 1977. Career and Life Satisfactions among Terman's Gifted Women. In: George, W.C. and Solano, C.H., eds.,The Gifted and the Creative: A Fifty-Year Perspective. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, R.G. and Rosenberg, F. 1975. Sex, Sex-Roles, and Self-image.Journal of Youth and Adolescence 4: 229–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.E. 1982. The Case for Parental Transmission of Educational Goals: The Importance of Accurate Offspring Perceptions.Journal of Marriage and the Family 44(3): 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. 1983.SPSS User's Guide. New York: Mcgraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines, G., Tavris, C. and Jayaratne, C. 1974. The Queen Bee Syndrome.Psychology Today 7: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. and Coombs, A.W. 1952. Self-Acceptance and Adjustment.Journal of Consulting Psychology Psychology 16: 300–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. and Reitz, W. 1968. The Three Faces of Self-Esteem. Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario.Research Bulletin 80 (April): 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J.T., Meckstroth, E.A. and Tolan, S.S. 1985.Guiding the Gifted Child. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psychology Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, L.J. and Rizzo, D. 1974. Images of Males and Females in Elementary School Textbooks in Five Subject Areas.Biased Textbooks. Washington: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, G.S. 1977. Personality Correlates of Intelligence and Creativity in Gifted Adolescents. In: Stanley, J.C., et al., eds.,The Gifted and the Creative: A Fifty-Year Perspective. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwan, P.C.F. Singaporean gifted adolescents under scrutiny: The gender factor. Int Rev Educ 39, 161–182 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102400

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102400

Keywords

Navigation