Skip to main content
Log in

The nutritive value of some selected Tanzanian plant food sources

  • Published:
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chemical composition of different varieties of field beans (Vicia faba L.), cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata), groundnuts (Voandzeia subterranea), and sorghum (Sorghum vulgare) were determined. Nutrients analysed in these materials included amino acids, starch, sugar, fibre, minerals and antinutritional factors. All the materials were further tested in balance trials with rats; true protein digestibility (TD), biological value (BV), net protein utilization (NPU) and digestible energy (DE) were evaluated. Based on the chemical analyses as well as on the biological data, the nutritive value of plant materials between species as well as between varieties within species differed considerably. Therefore, more quality evaluation studies along with plant breeding programmes are needed to select the most promising varieties from the nutritional point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muhammed A, Aksel R, Von Borstel RC (1976) Genetic Diversity in Plants. New York: Plenum Press, p. 505.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bach Knudsen KE, Munck, L, Eggum BO (1988) Effects of cooking, pH and polyphenol level on carbohydrate composition and nutritional quality of a sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L) Moench food, ugali. Brit J Nutri 59: 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  3. AOAC (1975) Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stoldt W (1957) Vorslag zur Vereinheitlichung der Fettebestimmung in Lebensmitteln. Fette und Siefen 54: 206–207.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clegg M (1956) The application of the anthronereagent to estimation of starch in cereals. J Food Sci Agric 7: 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mason VC, Bech-Andersen S, Rudemo M (1980) Hydrolysate preparation for amino acid determination in feed constituents. Tierphysiol Tierernährg u Futtermittelkde 43: 146–164.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fibre analysis. In: Agricultural Handbook No 379. Washington: Agricultural Research Sciences, USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boisen S (1983) Protease inhibitors in cereals: Occurrence, properties, physiological role and nutritional influence. Acta Agric Scand 33: 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eggum BO, Christensen KD (1975) Influence of tannin on protein utilization in feedstuffs with special reference to barley. In: Breeding for Seed Protein Improvement Using Nuclear Techniques. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, pp. 135–143.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Milner BA, Whiteside PJ (1981) Introduction to Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. Cambridge, UK: Pye Unican Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stuffins CB (1967) The determination of phosphate and calcium in feeding stuffs. Analyst 92: 107–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eggum BO (1973) A study of certain factors influencing protein utilization in rats and pigs. Copenhagen: Report 406 National Institute of Animal Science.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bjerg B, Ebmeyer E, Eggum BO, Larsen T, Røbbelen G, Sørensen H (1988) The nutritive value of ten inbred lines of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) in relation to their content of antinutritional constituents and protein quality. Plant Breeding 101: 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pond WG, Manner JH (1974) Swine Production in Temperate and Tropical Environments. San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman, pp. 359–361.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mnembuka, B.V., Eggum, B.O. The nutritive value of some selected Tanzanian plant food sources. Plant Food Hum Nutr 44, 1–10 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01088477

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01088477

Key words

Navigation