Abstract
Language not only reflects, but shapes our perception of the world. In child care, the perception has been shaped by imagery borrowed from the medical and behavioral-learning models. But these fail to illuminate the key feature of child care, the relationship between child and worker. The metaphors of “competence” and “professionalism” attempt to make up for the inadequacies of the other models, yet neither of these ground the abstract “care” in everyday experience. Developmental science provides the base for a child care perspective, and the metaphors of care need to be sensitive to this base.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Durkin, R. (1983). The crisis in children's services: The dangers and opportunities for child care workers.Journal of Child Care, 1 (5), 1–13.
Durkin, R. (in press). Competency, relevance, and empowerment: A case for the restructuring of children's programs. In J. Anglin, C. Denholm, R. Ferguson, & A. Pence (Eds.),Perspectives in professional child and youth care. New York: Haworth Press.
Eisikovits, Z., & Beker, J. (1983). Beyond professionalism: The child and youth care workers as craftsman.Child Care Quarterly, 12, 93–112.
Kegan, R. (1982).The evolving self: Problem and process of human development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
White, R. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gudgeon, C. Mother, father, sister, friend: Metaphor and the craft of child care. Child Youth Care Forum 18, 17–22 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086797
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086797