Skip to main content
Log in

Residential care: A reevaluation of a threatened resource

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child and Youth Care Quarterly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the framework of permanency planning there are two main categories of residential care for children: residential group care for treatment purposes and residential group care as an alternative to foster family care. Based on a study conducted in Scotland, this paper argues that, for some children, residential care may play an important role in encouraging parental access and reunification with children. It may also have a more controversial place for a minority of older children in providing a permanent alternative placement to foster family care that promotes continuing links with families of origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldgate, J. (1976). The child in care and his parents.Adoption and Fostering, 84(2), 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldgate, J. (1977).Identification of factors influencing children's length of stay in care. Phd. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.

  • Aldgate, J. (1980). Identification of factors influencing children's length of stay in care. In Triseliotis, J. (ed).New developments in foster care and adoption. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Pp. 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docker-Drysdale, B. (1986).Therapy in child care. Longman.

  • Fanshel, D. (1975). Parental visiting of children in foster care: Key to discharge.Social Service Review, 49(4), 493–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanshel, D. (1976). Status changes of children in foster care.Child Welfare, 55(3), 143–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P.G., & Parr, E.A. (1957).Children in care and the recruitment of foster parents. Social Survey 249, HMSO.

  • Holman, R. (1975). The place of fostering in social work.British Journal of Social Work, 5(1), 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, M. (1980). Planning for permanent placement.Adoption and fostering, 99(1), 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maluccio, A.N., Fein, E., Hamilton, J., Klier, J.L., & Ward, D. (1980). Beyond permanency planning.Child Welfare, 59(9), 515–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maluccio, A.N., & Sinanoglu, P.A. (1981).The challenge of partnership: Working with parents of children in foster care. New York: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packman, J. (1968).Child care: Needs and numbers. Allen and Unwin.

  • Roew, J., & Lambert, L. (1973).Children who wait. Association of British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.

  • Sontag, A. (1974). Preventing child abuse.Social Work Review, 4(20), 634–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, O. (1968). Reception into care: Its meaning for all concerned. In Tod R.J.N.(ed).Children in Care. Longmans. Pp. 8–17.

  • Studt (1973). Therapeutic factors in group living in Tod, R.J.N.(ed).Disturbed children. Longman, Pp 42–60.

  • Timms, N. (1973).The receiving end. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R.G., & Heywood (1971).The forgotten children. Extra Mural Department, University of Manchester.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aldgate, J. Residential care: A reevaluation of a threatened resource. Child Youth Care Forum 16, 48–59 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086120

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086120

Keywords

Navigation