Abstract
Positive Peer Culture has been a popular peer group intervention strategy for delinquent youth for about the last 12 years. Questions have been raised, however, regarding the effectiveness of peer group approaches. The present study addresses the effective change in self-concept of 231 adjudicated delinquents in positive peer culture treatment.
References
Durkin, R. & Durkin, A. (1975). Evaluating residential treatment programmes for disturbed children. In M. Guttertag & E. Struening (Eds.),Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Fitts, W. (1965).Tennessee self-concept scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Garrett, C. (1985). Effects of residential treatment on adjudicated delinquents: A metaanalysis.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 287–308.
Gerrard, J. (1975).An evaluation of the positive peer culture program in a boy's correctional school. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
Gold, M. (1974). A time for skepticism.Journal of Crime and Delinquency, 20, 20–24.
Lybarger, W. (1976). The effect of positive peer culture on the self-concept and rate of exhibition of inappropriate behavior of the emotionally disturbed adolescent male.Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 2113A (University Microfilms No. 76–22, 566).
Meyer, R. (1974). [Review ofPositive peer culture].Child Welfare, 9, 605–606.
Michigan Department of Social Services. (1983).The institution centers: Objectives and progress. Lansing, MI: Institutional Services Division. O.C.Y.S.
Minnesota Department of Corrections. (1973).The Red Wing Training School follow-up study. Minneapolis, MN: Research Division, 1973.
Patton, M. (1978).Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Payne, C. (1981). Research and evaluation in group care. In F. Ainsworth & L. Fulcher (Eds.),Group care for children (pp. 247–270) London: Tavistock Publications.
Phillips, E. (1975). [Review ofPositive peer culture: Charting a new course of education and training with contemporary youth].Behavior Therapy, 6, 717–718.
Schaefer, C. (1980). The impact of the peer culture in the residential treatment of youth.Adolescence, 15, 831–845.
Velasquez, J. & Lyle, C. (1985). Day versus residential treatment for juvenile offenders: The impact of program evaluation.Child Welfare, 64, 145–156.
Vorrath, H. & Brendtro, L. (1974).Positive peer culture: A reformed approach to work with youth. Chicago: Aldine.
Vorrath, H. & Brendtro, L. (1985).Positive peer culture (2nd ed.). New York: Aldine.
Wasmund, W. (1980a).The effects of positive peer culture upon the self-concept of adolescent offenders. Unpublished manuscript, Woodland Hills, Duluth, MN.
Wasmund, W. (1980b).A research evaluation November, 1977 through March, 1980 of the Woodland Hills residential treatment program. Unpublished manuscript, Woodland Hills, Duluth, MN.
Weiss, C. (1972).Evaluating action programs. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Wright, W. & Dixon, M. (1977). Community prevention and treatment of delinquency.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 14, 35–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Ken Stafford in the data collection and Colleen Renier in data analysis.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Davis, G.L., Hoffman, R.G. & Quigley, R. Self-concept change and positive peer culture in adjudicated delinquents. Child Youth Care Forum 17, 137–145 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083856
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01083856