Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Responses of units in the magnocellular part of the medial geniculate body to acoustic and somatosensory stimulation

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Responses of 150 neurons in the magnocellular part of the medial geniculate body to clicks and to electrodermal stimulation of the contralateral forelimb were investigated in cats immobilized with myorelaxin. Of the total number of neurons 65% were bimodal, 16.6% responded only to clicks, and 15.4% only to electrodermal stimulation. The unitary responses were excitatory (spike potentials) and inhibitory (inhibition of spontaneous activity). Responses beginning with excitation occurred more frequently to stimulation by clicks than to electrodermal stimulation, whereas initial inhibition occurred more often to electrodermal stimulation. The latent period of the initial spike potentials in response to clicks and to electrodermal stimulation was 5–27 and 6–33 (mean 11.6 and 16.2) msec respectively. Positive correlation was found between the latent periods of spike potentials recorded in the same neurons in response to clicks and to electrodermal stimulation, and also to electrodermal stimulation and to stimulation of the dorsal funiculus of the spinal cord. It is concluded that the magnocellular division of the medial genicculate body is a transitional structure between the posterior ventral nucleus and the parvocellular division of the medial geniculate body, and that in addition, it is connected more closely with the auditory than with the somatosensory system. It is suggested that the somatosensory input into the magnocellular division of the medial geniculate body is formed mainly by fibers of the medial lemniscus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. E. L. Polonskaya, "Conditioned responses of neurons of the magnocellular division of the medial geniculate body," Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat.,24, 986 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. N. Serkov, Electrophysiology of the Higher Divisions of the Auditory System [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1977), 216 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Boivie, "The termination in the thalamus and the zona incerta of fibres from the dorsal column nuclei (DGN) in the cat. Free enzymes. An experimental study with silver impregnation methods," Brain Res.,28, 459 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Boivie, "The termination of the spinothalamic tract in the cat. An experimental study with silver impregnation methods," Exp. Brain Res.,12, 331 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. I. Curry, "The exteroceptive properties of neurones in the somatic part of the posterior group (PO)," Brain Res.,44, 439 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Hand and C. N. Liu, "Efferent projections of the nucleus gracilis," Anat. Rec.,154, 353 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. H. Jasper and C. Ajmone-Marsan, A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Diencephalon of the Cat, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. G. Jones and T. P. S. Powell, "An analysis of the posterior group of thalamic nuclei on the basis of its efferent connections," J. Comp. Neurol.,143, 185 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. A. Lowe and J. W. Scott, "Some response characteristics of cells of the magnocellular division of the medial geniculate body of the cat," Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.,47, 881 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. D. Lund and K. E. Webster, "Thalamic afferents from the dorsal column nuclei. Experimental anatomical study in the rat," J. Comp. Neurol.,130, 301 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. K. Morest, "The neuronal architecture of the medial geniculate body of the cat," J. Anat.,98, 611 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. K. Nyguist and J. H. Greenhoot, "Unit analysis of nonspecific thalamic responses to high-intensity cutaneous input in the cat," Exp. Neurol.,42, 609 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. F. Poggio and V. B. Mountcastle, "A study of the functional contributions of the lemniscal and spinothalamic systems to somatic sensibility," Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp.,106, 266 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  14. F. Reinoso-Suares, Topografische Hirnatlas der Katze, Darmstadt (1961).

  15. M. J. Rowe, and B. J. Sessle, "Somatic afferent input to posterior thalamic neurones and their axon projections to the cerebral cortex in the cat," J. Physiol. (London),196, 19 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. C. Wepsic, "Multimodal sensory activation of cells in the magnocellular medial geniculate nucleus," Exp. Neurol.,18, 299 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. G. Whitlock and E. R. Perl, "Afferent projections through ventrolateral funiculi to thalamus of cat," J. Neurophysiol.,22, 133 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. V. I. Khorevin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

A. A. Bogomolets Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Kiev. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 133–141, March–April, 1978.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khorevin, V.I. Responses of units in the magnocellular part of the medial geniculate body to acoustic and somatosensory stimulation. Neurophysiology 10, 89–94 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078555

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078555

Keywords

Search

Navigation