Skip to main content
Log in

Pheromonal control of mating patterns inDrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple-choice mating tests comparing the mating propensity among and within inbred lines were performed forDrosophila melanogaster. Courtship activity, time to copulation, and assortative mating were all directly correlated with the degree of inbreeding. By the eighth generation of sib mating, there was a 76% incidence of negative assortative mating in multiple-choice tests and a marked reduction of courtship behavior among sibs. Furthermore, absence of sperm in the females of nonreproductive pairs indicated that much of the attrition of inbred lines was due to failure of sibs to mate. When individuals of “sterile cultures” were allowed an opportunity to outcross, most were fertile and exhibited normal mating and courtship activity. Olfactometer tests with either unrelated flies or collected pheromone samples as source material indicated that airborne chemosignals are required for initiation of courtship inD. melanogaster. Visual and audio cues were found to be noncritical inD. melanogaster courtship and mating. Intraspecific qualitative pheromone variation, at one or a few loci, is thought to be functioning as the control mechanism in selective mating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bastock, M., and Manning, A. (1955). The courtship ofDrosophilia melanogaster.Behavior 8: 85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet-Clark, H. C., and Ewing, A. W. (1967). Stimuli provided by courtship of maleDrosophila melanogaster.Nature 215: 669–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet-Clark, H. C., and Ewing, A. W. (1970). The love song of the fruit fly.Sci. Am. 223: 85–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bundgaard, J., and Christiansen, F. B. (1972). Dynamics of polymorphisms. I. Selection components in an experimental population ofD. melanogaster.Genetics 71: 439–460.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrich, G. W. (1941). Non-random mating between yellow-white and wild typeD. melanogaster.Genetics 26: 148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T., and Koller, P. C. (1938). An experimental study of sexual isolation inDrosophila.Biol. Zentr. 58: 589–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1966). Mating success and genotype frequency inDrosophila.Anim. Behav. 14: 332–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1967). Further studies on genotype frequency and mating succes inDrosophila.Am. Naturalist 101; 921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, L. (1972). A factor influencing the rare-male mating advantage inDrosophila.Behav. Genet. 2: 69–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elens A. A., and Wattiaux J. M. (1964). Direct observation of sexual isolation.Drosophila. Inform. Serv.39: 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossfield, J. (1968). The relative importance of wing utilization in light dependent courtship inDrosophila.Stud. Genet. (Univ. Tex. Publ. No. 6818)4: 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossfield J. (1972). Decapitated females as a tool in the analysis ofDrosophila behavior.Anim. Behav. 20: 243–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. A. (1972). The ability ofDrosophila melanogaster (Diptera) to recognize different genotypes.Abst. 14th Internat. Congr. Entomol., p. 121.

  • Johnson, F. M., Kanape, C. G., Richardson, R. H., Wheeler, M. R., and Stone, W. S. (1966). An analysis of polymorphisms among isozyme loci in dark and lightDrosophila ananassae strains from American and Western Samoa.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 56: 119–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C. and Hubby, J. L. (1966). A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations ofD. pseudoobscura.Genetics 54: 595–609.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, D. J. (1948). Selective mating inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 34: 370–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson R. H., and Johnson, F. M. (1967). Isozyme variability in species of the genusDrosophila. II. A multiple allelic isozyme system inDrosophila busckii: A stable polymorphic system.Biochem. Genet. 1: 73–79.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, H. H., and Bartell, R. J. (1970). Role of volatile female sex pheromone in stimulating male courtship behavior inD. melanogaster.Anim. Behav. 18: 159–164.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. (1952). Mating behavior within the genusDrosophila (Diptera).Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99: Article 7, 395–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. (1966). Mating behavior of D.ananassae andananassae-like flies from the Pacific.Stud. Genet. (Univ. Tex. Publ. No. 6615) 3: 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. (1915). Experiments in sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection inDrosophila.Anim. Behav. 5: 351–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M. R. (1972).The UFAW Handbook on Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, 4th ed., Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh and London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The investigation was conducted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by W. W. A. while he was supported by PHS Training Grant No. 5T01 GM-00337 from the National Institutes of General Medical Sciences. Other research support was by NSF Grant GB 36103X to R. H. R. The support of NIH Research Career Development Award 5 KO4-GM 47350 to R. H. R. also is acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Averhoff, W.W., Richardson, R.H. Pheromonal control of mating patterns inDrosophila melanogaster . Behav Genet 4, 207–225 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074155

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074155

Key Words

Navigation