Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigated L1 orthographic impact on cognitive processing involved in L2 reading. In a cross-linguistic experiment with four orthographically diverse groups (Arabic, English, Japanese, and Spanish), the effects of two types of phonological encoding interference (phonological similarity and unpronounceability) on short-term memory recall performance in English were compared. Data demonstrate that (a) STM recall performance of all four groups was seriously impaired when phonological encoding interference was present, (b) the two types of interference had differential effects on STM performance between phonographic (Arabic, English, and Spanish) and morphographic (Japanese) readers, and (c) phonological coding strategies used in L1 and L2 are consistent. These results seem to indicate, first, that a phonological code is dominantly used in the STM encoding process regardless of the language background: second, that different phonological coding strategies are used among subjects with contrasting orthographic backgrounds; and, third, that strategies used in L1 processing are transferred to L2 processing. Hence, the findings of the study suggest that there is a strong relationship between orthography and cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddeley, A.D. (1966). Short term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic, and formal similarity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1978). The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockhart's framework or memory research.Psychological Review, 85, 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besner, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1987). Orthographic and phonological codes in the oral reading of Japanese Kana.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learing, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradly, L., & Bryant, P.E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read—A causal connection.Nature, 301, 419–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H. (1976). Short-term memory limitations in children: Capacity or processing deficts?Memory and Cognition, 4, 559–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimbalo, R. S., & Laughery, K. B. (1967). Short term memory: Effects of auditory and visual similarity.Psychonomic Science, 8, 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading task. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1984). Writing systems and reading disorders. In L. Henderson (Ed.),Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusion in immediate memory.Britisch Journal of Psychology, 55, 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span.British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, R. C. (1978). Language and memory. In J. F. Kavanagh & W. Strange (Eds.),Speech and language in the laboratory, school, and clinic. Cambridge, MA: M. I. T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, P. M., & Cunningham, J. W. (1978). Investigating the “print to meaning” hypothesis. In P. D. Pearson, & J. Hansen (Eds.),Reading: Disciplined inquiry in process and practice (27th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference). Clemson, SC: National Reading Conference.

  • Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W., Pollack, M. D. & Montague, W. E. (1970). Implicit speech: Mechanisms in perceptual cooding?Journal of Experimental Psychology, 84, 502–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, I. J. (1963).A study of writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Orthographic resources affect reading acquisition—If they are used.Remedial and Special Education, 6, 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L. R., & Rozin, P. (1977). The structure and acquisition of reading I: Relation between orthographies and the structure of language. In A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (Eds.),Toward a psychology of reading: The processings of the CUNY conference. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.5, 674–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1968). Introduction. In J. Goody (Ed.),Literacy in traditional societies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1963). The consequence of literacy.Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5, 303–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. W., & Shallice, T. (1976). Direct visual access in reading for meaning.Memory and Cognition, 4, 753–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L. (1982). Short-term recall by deaf signers of American sign language: Implications of encoding strategy for order recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 572–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, A. F. (1975). Coding of temporal-spatial patterns in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 481–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. (1982).Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. (1985). Issues in the modeling of pronunciation assembly in normal reading. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.),Surface dyslexia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japanese National Research Institute (1964).The development of language ability in elementary school children. Tokyo: Sohuei Shuppan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixation to comprehension.Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987).The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiho, H., & Nomura, Y. (1983).Kanji johoshori no shinrigaku [The psychology of Kanji processing]. Tokyo: Kyoiku Shuppan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension.Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapp, S. T. (1971). Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions,Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 262–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman, G. M. (1975). Speech recoding in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (1987). Cognitive strategy transfer in second language reading. In J. Devine, P. L. Carrell, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.),Research in reading in English as a second language. Washington, DC: TESOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. A. (1971). Role of articulation in auditory and visual short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. A. (1975). Vocalization and suppression effects in sentence memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 304–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, B. A. (1977). Reading: Speech and meaning processes.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 623–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., Mann, V. A., Shankweiler, D., & Werfelman, M. (1982). Children's memory for recurring linguistic and nonlinguistic material in relation to reading ability.Cortex, 18, 367–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write.Remedial and Special Education, 6, 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V. A. (1985). A cross-linguistic perspective on the relation between temporary memory skills and early reading ability.Remedial and Special Education, 6, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchen, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1982). The visual tongue-twister effect: Phonological activation in silent reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 672–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E., & Ruddy, M. G. (1973).Lexical-memory retrieval based on graphemic and phonemic representation of printed words. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.

  • Mou, L. C., & Anderson, N. S. (1981). Graphemic and phonemic codings of Chinese characters in short-term retention.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murry, D. J. (1965). Vocalization-at-presentation and immediate recall with varying presentation rates.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon, D., & Shimron, J. (1984). Reading Hebrew: How necessary is the graphemic representation of vowels? In L. Henderson (Ed.),Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1975). Review ofToward a literacy society (J. B. Carroll & J. Chall, eds.).Proceedings of the National Academy of Education, 2, 109–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing.Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, M., Hagiwara, H., & Hildebrandt, N. (1985).Neurolinguistic aspects of the Japanese writing system. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. E., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.),Surface dyslexia, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1977). Discourse comprehension and source of individual differences. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1979). Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction. In L. B. Resnick & P. Weaver (Eds.),Theory and practice of early reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & McCutchen, D. (1982). Speech process in reading. In N. Lass (Ed.),Advances in speech and language (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosson, M. B. (1985). The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representation in reading aloud.Memory and Cognition, 13, 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., & Rubenstein M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recording in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 647–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasanuma, S. (1984). Can surface dyslexia occur in Japanese? In L. Henderson (Ed.),Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981).The psychology or literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.Cognition, 19, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. D., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 384–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirakawa, S. (1978).Kanji hyakuwa [Hundred stories of Kanji]. Tokyo: Chukoshinsho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slowiaczek, M. L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1980). Subvocalization and reading for meaning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 573–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1982). An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules?Memory and Cognition, 10, 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theios, J., & Muise, J. G. (1976). The word identification process in reading. In N. J. Castellan, Jr., & D. Piosoni (Eds.),Cognitive theory (Vol. 2). Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M. T., Feldman, L. B., & Lukatela, G. (1984). The Serbo-Croatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy. In L. Henderson (Ed.),Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and tinguistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (1977). Speech recoding in reading Chinese characters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 621–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. J. L., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (1983). The first two R's: The way different languages reduce speech to script affects how visual information is processed in the brain.American Scientist, 71, 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickelgren, W. A. (1965). Acoustic similarity and retroactive interference in short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 70, 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yik, W. F. (1978). The effect of visual and acoustic similarity on short-term memory for Chinese words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 487–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B., Zhang, W., Jing, Q., Peng, R., Zhang, G., & Simon, H. A. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese and English language materials.Memory and Cognition, 13, 202–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G., & Simon, H. A. (1985). STM capacity for Chinese words and idioms: Chunking and acoustical loop hypotheses.Memory and Cognition, 13, 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koda, K. Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies. J Psycholinguist Res 18, 201–222 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067782

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067782

Keywords

Navigation