Skip to main content
Log in

The recognition and cognitive utilization of oppositionality

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research series begins in the theoretical view that human cognition rests in part upon implicit oppositionality. Four experiments are presented, each of which builds on some aspect of the recognition and utilization of oppositionality. Experiment I (34 females, 46 males, in cross-validation) finds that subjects recognize antonymy as readily as synonymy in comparison with a control condition (p<.001). Experiment II demonstrates that subjects rely upon oppositionality to solve a problem as readily as on primacy/recency considerations (p<.001). Experiment III (27 males, 27 females) finds that a subject's ability to recognize the opposite meaning of sentences that have been exposed earlier increases with practice (p<.05). Experiment IV (10 females, 11 males) demonstrates that subjects who are given the set to look for either opposite or nonopposite sentence meanings can make oppositional decisions with equal or greater speed than nonoppositional decisions (p<.001). Implications for psycholinguistic theories are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aristotle. (1952). On memory and reminiscence. In R.M. Hutchins (Ed.),Great books of the western world (Vol. 8, pp. 690–695). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, J. (1961). Associative factors in verbal transfer.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E.G. (1950).A history of experimental psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W.F. (1974). There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In W.B. Weimer & D.S. Palermo (Eds.),Cognition and the symbolic processes (pp. 1–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W.F., & Lichtenstein, E.H. (1974). Memory for marked semantic features versus memory for meaning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 172–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. In M. Halle, J. Bresnan, & G.A. Miller (Eds.),Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, L., & Eagle, M. (1970). Synonymity, antonymity, and association in false recognition response.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 244–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, J.A., & Taylor, P.J. (1985). Effects of semantic relatedness on same-different decisions in a good-bad categorization task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (1984).The nature of the child. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karwoski, T.F., & Schachter, J. (1948). Psychological studies in semantics: III. Reaction times for similarity and differences.Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldergaard, P.M. (1962). Commonality scores under instructions to give opposites.Psychological Reports, 11, 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzer, M.A., Leonard, C., & Flavell, J.H. (1975). An interview study of children's knowledge about memory.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,40(159).

  • Lamiell, J.T. (1987).The psychology of personality: An epistemological inquiry, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1977).Semantics (Vol. 1). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mink, W.D. (1963). Semantic generalization as related to word association.Psychological Reports, 12, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C.E. (1952). The nature and measurement of meaning.Psychological Bulletin, 49, 197–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, M.M. (1972). Demand characteristics and the verbal operant conditioning experiment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1952).Sophist. In R.M. Hutchins (Ed.),Great books of the western world (Vol. 7, pp. 551–579). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, W. (1980).Dictionary of philosophy and religion. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, I.A. (1967). Introduction. In C. K. Ogden,Opposition: A linguistic and psychological analysis (pp. 7–13). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J.J., III (1960). Comparison of verbal response transfer mediated by meaningfully similar and associated stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 408–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, R.W., Durso, F.R., & Mukherji, B.R. (1982). Semantic distance effects in categorization tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siipola, E., Walker, W.N., & Kolb, D. (1955). Task attitude in word association, projective and nonprojective.Journal of Personality, 23, 441–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trier, J. (1931).Der deutsche wortschatz im sinnbezirk des verstandes. Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umemoto, T. (1959). Japanese studies in verbal learning and memory.Psychologia, 2, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss-Shed, E. (1973). Synonyms, antonyms and retroactive inhibition with meaningful materials.Psychological Reports, 33, 459–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, M. (1981). Direct and dialectical semantics of human freedom.Etcetera: A Review of General Semantics, 38, 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, D.D., & Cermack, L.S. (1967). Transfer effects of synonyms and antonyms in a mixed and unmixed list design.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 832–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B.J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R.S. & Carlston, D.E. (1979).Social cognition, inference, and attribution. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rychlak, J.F., Barnard, S., Williams, R.N. et al. The recognition and cognitive utilization of oppositionality. J Psycholinguist Res 18, 181–199 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067781

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067781

Keywords

Navigation