Skip to main content
Log in

Extralinguistic control of language comprehension and production in the nonfluent child

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigated (1) the developmental progression postulated to exist between comprehension and production of sentences having the same grammatical form, and (2) the effects of syntactic, semantic, and extralinguistic variables on comprehension and production in nursery-school children. Comprehension trials required choices among four puzzle piece alternatives for which (a) both subject and object pieces differed (Phase I) or (b) only grammatical subject pictures differed (Phase II). During production trials children were asked to label preconstructed puzzles. Results indicated the comprehension-production relationship to vary as a function of age, sentence prepositions, and phases. Differential effects of semantic and extralinguistic variables during comprehension were found primarily for the youngest children, suggesting that logical relations among agent-actor-object were not sole controllers of language comprehension. Nonsyntactic control of production responses was not found.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird, R. On the role of change in imitation-comprhension-production test results.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 474–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beilin, H.Studies in the cognitive basis of language development. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bever, T. G. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In F. R. Hayes (Ed.),Cognition and the development of language. New York, Wiley, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L.One word at a time: The use of single word utterances before syntax. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, L. Talking, understanding, and thinking. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.),Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974, Pp. 285–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. F. Structural relationships in children's utterances: Syntactic or semantic? In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman, M. F. Discussion summary: Development of concepts underlying language. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.),Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore: Uniersity Park Press, 1974, Pp. 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. S. Discussion summary: Developmental relationship between receptive and expressive language. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.),Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974, Pp. 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R. S., & Miller, J. F. Word order in early two and three word utterances: Does production precede comprehension?Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1975,18, 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.),Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1973,2, 267–278. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, J. G., & de Villiers, P. A. Development of the use of word order in comprehension.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1973,2, 331–341. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A.Language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernald, C. Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production: Problems of replication.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 606–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, C., Bellugi, U., & Brown, R. Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963,2, 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowie, C. J. Semantics and syntax in sentence processing: Children's comprehension of an exceptional linguistic structure.Journal of the Association for Research in Growth Relationships, 1974,6(1), 21–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowie, C. J., & Powers, J. E. Effect of children's expectations on comprehension of the passive transformation.Research in the Teaching of English, 1972,6(1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowie, C. J., & Powers, J. E. Relations among cognitive, semantic and syntactic variables in children's comprehension of the minimum distance principle: A two-year developmental study.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1979,8, 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutson, B. A. How abstract is a young child's knowledge of syntax?Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1975,126, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutson, B. A., & Powers, J. E. Reversing irreversible sentences: Semantic and syntactic factors.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1974,6, (1), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., Eisenberg, K., & Strauss, S. Comprehension: Relation between perceived actor and logical subject.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968,7, 527–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., & Strauss, S. Comprehension and a statement's relation to the situation it describes.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968,7, 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., & Weiner, S. L. Comprehension of instruction in varying contexts.Cognitive Psychology, 1971,2, 369–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, D. The relationship between comprehension and production. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.),Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974, Pp. 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, California: Wadsworth, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, K., & Dixon, E. The growth of the control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1967,8, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J. Cognitive basis of language learning in infants.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1972.

  • Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. Teaching visual language to apes and language deficient persons. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.),Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974. Pp. 347–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, E. F. Psycholinguistics discovers the operant: A review of Roger Brown'sA first language: The early stages.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975,23, 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.Verbal behavior, new York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderquist, D., & Gaebelein, J.Statistical principles. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, 1976.

  • Staats, A. W. Behavior and cognitive theory in the study of language: A neopsycholinguistics. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.),Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1974. Pp. 615–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohner, H., & Nelson, K. The young child's development of sentence comprehension: Influence of event probability, nonverbal context, syntactic form, and strategies.Child Development, 1974,45, 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent-Smith, L., Bricker, D., & Bricker, W. Acquisition of receptive vocabulary in the toddler-age child.Child Development, 1974,45, 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetstone, H. S., & Friedlander, B. Z. The effect of word order on young children's responses to simple questions and commands.Child Development, 1973,44, 734–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J., & Vasta, R. Is language acquired through imitation?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1975,4(1), 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoenigmann-Stovall, N.M. Extralinguistic control of language comprehension and production in the nonfluent child. J Psycholinguist Res 11, 1–17 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067498

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067498

Keywords

Navigation