Abstract
A concept-formation study was run using sets of sentences in eight different syntactic patterns as target categories. These were based on all possible combinations of voice (active or passive), mood (declarative or interrogative), and modality (affirmative or negative). Subjects were 32 senior high school students who participated as volunteers in the computer-controlled experiment. Subjects were able to categorize sentences based solely on sentence types rather than semantic content, but an analysis of the errors committed in the course of learning showed that it was the semantic significance of different types rather than pattern differences as such to which a subject responded. The implications of this for grammatical formulations and the interpretation of psychological research were discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.),Cognition and the Development of Language. Wiley, New York.
Chambers, J. K. (1970). Focused noun phrases in English syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta.
Chomsky, N. (1957).Syntactic Structures, Mouton & Co., The Hague.
Chomsky, N. (1965).Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Clifton, C., Jr., and Odom, P. (1966). Similarity relations among certain English sentence constructions.,Psychol. Monogr. 80, No. 5.
Fillenbaum, S. (1970). On the use of memorial techniques to assess syntactic structures,Psychol. Bull. 73, 231–237.
Fillmore, C. J. (1966). A proposal concerning English prepositions. In Dinneen, F. P. S. J. (ed.),Report of the Seventeenth Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies. Georgetown Univ. Press, Washington, D. C.
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E., and Harms, R. T. (eds.),Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York.
Fodor, J. A., and Garrett, M. (1966). Some reflections on competence and performance. In Lyons, J. and Wales, R. J. (eds.),Psycholinguistic Papers: The Proceedings of the 1966 Edinburgh Conference. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh, 1966.
Fodor, J. A., and Garrett, M. (1967). Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity.Percep. Psychophys. 4, 304–306.
Katz, J. J., and Postal, P. (1964).An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Lakoff, G. (1971). On generative semantics. In Steinberg, D. D. and Jakobovits, A. (eds.),Semantics An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Mehler, J. (1963). Some effects of grammatical transformations on the recall of English sentences.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 2, 346–351.
Miller, G. A. (1962). Some psychological studies of grammar.Am. Psychol. 17, 748–762.
Miller, G. A., and Chomsky, N. (1963). Finitary models of language users. In Luce, R. D. and Galanter, E. (eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology Vol. II. Wiley, New York.
Schlesinger, I. M. (1971). Production of utterances and language acquisition. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.),The Ontogenesis of Grammar: A Theoretical Symposium. Academic Press, New York.
Veldman, D. J. (1967).Fortran Programming for the Behavioral Sciences. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Watt, W. C. (1970). On two hypotheses concerning psycholinguistics. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.),Cognition and the Development of Language. Wiley, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, W.J., Prideaux, G.D. & Derwing, B.L. Grammatical properties of sentences as a basis for concept formation. J Psycholinguist Res 2, 201–220 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067102
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067102