Skip to main content
Log in

Ambushing and prey-luring as alternative foraging tactics of the fly-catching rove beetleLeistotrophus versicolor (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The tropical forest rove beetle Leistotrophus versicoloris a specialized obligate predator of adult Diptera that exhibits unusual flexibility and complexity in the capture of its prey. Individuals can be located on vertebrate dung or carrion, where they wait to ambush incoming flies drawn to these materials. But in places without rotting materials, the beetles switch to waiting on leaves or rocks, where they may use secretions to lure very small flies to them. Evidence for chemical luring comes from observations of small flies closely approaching and sometimes touching immobile beetles. In addition, the beetles have several specialized behavior patterns that involve the release of highly scented secretory or excretory products from structures at the tip of the abdomen. These materials may be deposited on the substrate, with the beetle then positioning its head over the applied substances, or the beetle may wave its abdomen tip with its scent-releasing devices toward small flies that happen to approach it. The ability to employ alternative tactics enables individuals to forage successfully even in areas that do not contain fly-attracting rotting matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, J., and Forsyth, A. (1988). Post-copulatory aggression toward their mates by males of the rove beetleLeistotrophus versicolor (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, J. (1978). Anatomie comparée des systèmes glandulaires de défense chimique des Staphylinidae.Arch. Biol. 89: 217–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balduf, W. V. (1935). The bionomics of the entomophagous Coleoptera. Classey, Hampton, Middlesex (1969 reprint).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristowe, W. S. (1958).The World of Spiders, Collins, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio, E. (1976).The Ethology of Predation, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1980). Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy? In Barlow, G. W., and Silverberg, J. (eds.),Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture? Westview Press, Boulder, Colo., pp. 331–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettner, K. (1987). Chemosystematics and the evolution of beetle chemical defenses.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 32: 17–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (1977). Aggressive chemical mimicry by a bolas spider.Science 198: 1173–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, L. J., and Pattenden, G. (1975). Iridodial, and a new alkanone, 4-methylhexan-3-one, in the defensive secretion of the beetle,Staphylinus olens.J. Insect Physiol. 21: 741–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A., and Alcock, J. (1990). Female mimicry and resource defense polygyny by males of a tropical rove beetleLeistotrophus versicolor (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, A., and Peck, S. J. (1982). Competition, structure and competitive behaviour in a guild of Ecuadorian rainforest dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae).Can. J. Zool. 60: 1624–1634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B., and Bartholomew, G. A. (1979). Ecology of the African dung beetle.Sci. Am. 241(5): 146–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. (1983). Seasonal change in abundance of large nocturnal dung beetles (Scarabeidae) in a Costa Rican deciduous forest and adjacent horse pasture.Oikos 41: 274–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1965). Aggressive mimicry inPhoturis: firefly femmes fatales.Science 149: 653–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1984). On deception, a way of all flesh, and firefly signalling and systematics. In Dawkins, R., and Ridley, M. (ed.),Oxford Surveys of Evolutionary Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 48–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E., and Wing, S. R. (1983). Nocturnal aerial predation of fireflies by light-seeking fireflies.Science 222: 634–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, D. H. (1980).Behavioral Mechanisms in Ecology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschke, K. (1987). Male aggression, female mimicry and female choice in the rove beetle,Aleochara curtula.Ethology 75: 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller, G. B. (1972).The Serengeti Lion, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. (1967). The ecological significance of sexual dimorphism in size in the lizardAnolis conspersus.Science 155: 474–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. (1974). Resource partitioning in ecological communities.Science 185: 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, M. K. (1988). Chemical mimicry. In Spencer, K. (ed.),The Chemical Mediation of Coevolution, Academic Press, New York, pp. 513–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983).The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forsyth, A., Alcock, J. Ambushing and prey-luring as alternative foraging tactics of the fly-catching rove beetleLeistotrophus versicolor (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). J Insect Behav 3, 703–718 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065960

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065960

Key words

Navigation