Abstract
Soft systems thinking is explored from the perspective of the interplay of systems theory and systems practice. The paper explores the interplay at a microlevel through the description and analysis of a case study. The paper illustrates that there are both technical and social dimensions to systems practice as well as an ongoing interplay of thinking (about the project) and action (in the situation). Indeed there is need to regard systems practice as a complex “sociotechnical” process and to use methodological frameworks as a basis for analyzing practice. This process of analysis is illustrated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Checkland, P. B. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Checkland, P. B., and Davies, L. J. (1986). The use of the term “Weltanschauung” in soft systems methodology.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 13, 109–115.
Davies, L. J. (1988). How SSM deals with complexity.Trans. Inst. Measure. Control 10(3), 130–138.
Davies, L. J., and Ledington, P. W. J. (1988). Creativity and metaphor in soft systems methodology.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 15(1).
Ledington, P. W. J., and Wootton, K. (1986). The management and operation of coaching systems—a systems approach. Paper presented at the Commonwealth Game Conference, July.
Lyle, J. (1986). Coach education—preparation for a profession. Keynote paper, Commonwealth Games Conference, July.
Smyth, D. S., and Checkland, P. B. (1976). Using a systems approach: The structure of root definitions.J. Appl. Syst. Anal. 5(1).
Wilson, B. (1984).Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ledington, P. The interplay of theory and practice in the ongoing development of soft systems thinking: An illustration and case study from sports management. Systems Practice 2, 29–45 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061616
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061616