Skip to main content
Log in

Safety and environmental aspects of organic coolants for fusion facilities

  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organic coolants, such as OS-84, offer unique advantages for fusion reactor applications. These advantages are with respect to both reactor operation and safety. The key operational advantage is a coolant that can provide high temperature (350–400°C) at modest pressure (2–4 MPa). These temperatures are needed for conditioning the plasma-facing components and, in reactors, for achieving high thermodynamic conversion efficiencies (>40%). The key safety advantage of organic coolants is the low vapor pressure, which significantly reduces the containment pressurization transient (relative to water) following a loss of coolant event. Also, from an occupational dose viewpoint, organic coolants significantly reduce corrosion and erosion inside the cooling system and consequently reduce the quantity of activation products deposited in cooling system equipment. On the negative side, organic coolants undergo both pyrolytic and radiolytic decomposition, and are flammable. While the decomposition rate can be minimized by coolant system design (by reducing coolant inventories exposed to neutron flux and to high temperatures), decomposition products are formed and these degrade the coolant properties. Both heavy compounds and light gases are produced from the decomposition process, and both must be removed to maintain adequate coolant properties. As these hydrocarbons may become tritiated by permeation, or activated through impurities, their disposal could create an environmental concern. Because of this potential waste disposal problem, consideration has been given to the recycling of both the light and heavy products, thereby reducing the quantity of waste to be disposed. Preliminary assessments made for various fusion reactor designs, including ITER, suggest that it is feasible to use organic coolants for several applications. These applications range from first wall and blanket coolant (the most demanding with respect to decomposition), to shield and vacuum vessel cooling, to an intermediate cooling loop removing heat from a liquid metal loop and transferring it to a steam generator or heat exchanger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. J. Spinks (1990). Improving CANDU Safety with Organic Coolant. Proc. 11th Annual Conf. of Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto.

  2. J. Romero (1984). An engineering evaluation of organic coolants for tokamak fusion power reactors.Fusion Technol. 6, 109.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Gierszewski and R. E. Hollies (1987). Organic coolants and their applications to fusion reactors.Nuclear Eng. Design/Fusion 4, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. E. Sawanet al. (1991). Organic Cooled First Wall and Shield Design for the ARIES-III D-3He Reactor. Proc. 14th IEEE Symp. on Fusion Engineering, San Diego.

  5. A. P. Beck and E. W. Fee (1991). Preliminary Design and Cost Estimate of Primary Heat Transport System and Steam Systems for an Organic Cooled Fusion Reactor. CFFTP I-9109, February.

  6. A. Natalizio, R. Hollies, R. Sochaski, and P. Stubley (1992). ITER Cooling Systems Option Study. CFFTP G-9204, June.

  7. R. Hollies and A. Natalizio. Experience with Organic Coolants in Nuclear Applications. CFFTP report (to be published).

  8. S. K. Soodet al. (1992). Development of a high-temperature isotopic exchange process for recovering tritium from fusion fuel impurities.Fusion Technol. 21, 921.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Natalizio, A., Hollies, R.E. & Gierszewski, P. Safety and environmental aspects of organic coolants for fusion facilities. J Fusion Energ 12, 177–181 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059375

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059375

Key words

Navigation