Abstract
Electrophoresis measurements on bubbles of electrogenerated hydrogen, oxygen and chlorine rising in a lateral electric field, are reported. In surfactant-free solutions, all bubbles displayed a point of zero charge of pH 2–3, i.e. they were negatively charged at pH > 3 and positively charged at pH < 2. The bubble diameter and electric field strength dependence of the electrophoretic mobilities, coupled with bubble rise rate measurements, indicated that the gas—aqueous solution interface was mobile, such that classical electrophoresis theory for solid particles could not be applied. Adsorption of anionic or cationic surfactants, in addition to modifying the apparent bubble charge, also tended to rigidify the bubble surface, so that at monolayer coverage the bubbles behaved as solid particles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- c :
-
electrolyte concentration (mol m−3)
- d :
-
bubble diameter (m)
- E :
-
electric field (V m−1)
- g :
-
gravitational constant (9.807 m s−2)
- n 0 :
-
ionic number density (m−3)
- q :
-
charge density [(μ, m) Cm−2]
- Q :
-
charge [(μ, m) C]
- r :
-
bubble radius (m)
- R :
-
universal gas constant (8.314 J mol−1 K−1)
- T :
-
absolute temperature (K)
- u :
-
electrophoretic mobility (m2 s−1 V−1)
- ν :
-
electrophoretic velocity (m s−1)
- ε :
-
electrolyte permittivity (F m−1)
- η :
-
electrolyte viscosity (N m−2 s)
- Γ:
-
surface concentration (mol m−2)
- k :
-
Debye-Huckel parameter (m−1)
- ϱ :
-
electrolyte density (kg m−3)
- ϱ′ :
-
gas density (kg m−3)
- ζ :
-
zeta potential (V)
References
H. A. McTaggart,Phil. Mag. 44 (1914) 297.
Idem, ibid. 105 (1922) 386.
T. Alty,Proc. R. Soc. 106 (1924) 315.
Idem, ibid. 112 (1926) 235.
C. Cichos,Neue Bergbautechnik 1 (1971) 941.
Idem, ibid. 2 (1972) 928.
R. W. Huddleston and A. L. Smith, in ‘Foams’, (edited by A. J. Akers) Academic Press, London (1976) pp. 147–160.
J. A. McShea and I. C. Callaghan,Colloid Polym. Sci. 261 (1983)757.
S. Usui and H. Sasaki,J. Colloid Interface Sci. 65 (1978) 36.
S. Usui, H. Sasaki and H. Matsukawa,ibid. 81 (1981) 80.
T. Sotskova, Yu. F. Bozhenov and L. Kulskii,Koll. Zh. 44 (1982) 989.
G. L. Collins and G. J. Jameson,Chem. Eng. Sci. 32 (1977) 239.
G. L. Collins, M. Matarjemiand G. J. Jameson,J. Colloid Interface. Sci. 63 (1978) 69.
Y. Fukui and S. Yuu,AIChEJ. 28 (1982) 866.
J. C. Scott, in ‘Symposium on Surface Contamination’, Vol. 1 (edited by K. L. Mittal) Plenum, New York (1978) pp. 477–497.
N. P. Brandon and G. H. Kelsall,J. Appl. Electrochem. 15 (1985) 475.
N. P. Brandon, PhD Thesis, London University (1985).
B. E. Conway, H. Angerstein-Kozlowska and W. B. A. Sharp,Anal. Chem. 45 (1973) 1331.
B. McGhee, PhD Thesis, Manchester University (1966).
V. G. Levich, ‘Physicochemical Hydrodynamics’, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1962) pp. 395–471.
D. W. Moore,J. Fluid Mech. 16 (1963) 161.
R. J. Hunter, ‘Zeta Potentials in Colloid Science’. Academic Press, New York (1981).
N. P. Brandon, G. H. Kelsall, S. Levine and A. L. Smith, to be published.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brandon, N.P., Kelsall, G.H., Levine, S. et al. Interfacial electrical properties of electrogenerated bubbles. J Appl Electrochem 15, 485–493 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059289
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059289