Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring by financial intermediaries: Banks vs. Nonbanks

  • Published:
Journal of Financial Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent empirical evidence indicates that captical markers respond positively to debt-financing announcements in the form of loan agreements. Nonbank firms, prompted largely by technological and telecommunications advances, have also entered the commercial lending market in recent years. This article finds evidence that borrowing firms experience positive abnormal returns upon announcing conclusions of loan agreements with nonbank firms. Our evidence suggests that nonbanks have replicated some of the unique attributes formerly enjoyed only by banks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Billett, Matthew, Mark J. Flannery, and Jon A. Garfinkel. “The Effect of Lender Identity on a Borrowing Firm's Equity Return.” Working paper, University of Florida, 1993.

  • Campbell, Tim, and William Kracaw. “Information Production, Market Signaling, and the Theory of Intermediation.”Journal of Finance 35 (December 1980), 863–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Douglas. “Asset Services and Financial Intermediation.” Center for Research on Security Prices, Working paper, 1986.

  • Diamond, Douglas. “Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring.”Review of Economic Studies 51 (May 1986), 119–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckbo, Espen. “Valuation Effects of Corporate Debt Offerings.”Journal of Financial Economics 15 (May 1986), 119–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene. “Banking in the Theory of Finance.”Journal of Monetary Economics 10 (January 1980), 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene. “What's Different About Banks?”Journal of Monetary Economics 15 (January 1985), 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgman, Donald,Commercial Bank Loan and Investment Policy. Bureau of Economics and Business Research, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Christopher. “Some Evidence of the Uniqueness of Bank Loans.”Journal of Financial Economics 19, (1987), 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, Edward, and Burton Malkiel. “Bank Portfolio Allocation, Deposit Variability and the Availability Doctrine.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 79, (1965), 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, Haynes, and David Pyle. “Information Asymmetries, Financial Structure and Financial Intermediaries.”Journal of Finance 32, (May, 1977), 371–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lummer, Scott, and John McConnell. “Further Evidence on the Bank Lending Process and the Capital Market Response to Bank Loan Agreements.”Journal of Financial Economics 25 (November 1989), 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelson, Wayne, and Megan Partch. “Valuation Effects of Securities Offerings and the Issuance Process.”Journal of Financial Economics 15, (May 1986), 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan, Ram, and Anjan Thakor. “Information Reliability and a Theory of Financial Intermediation.”Review of Economic Studies 51 (1984), 415–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansley, James, Fayez Elayan, and M. Cary Collins.” Firm Quality and Investment Opportunities: An Empirical Investigation of the Information in Bank Lines of Credit.” Working paper, University of Tennessee, 1993.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Preece, D.C., Mullineaux, D.J. Monitoring by financial intermediaries: Banks vs. Nonbanks. J Finan Serv Res 8, 193–202 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01057736

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01057736

Keywords

Navigation