Skip to main content
Log in

Cholinergic modulation of the synaptic transmission in the frog spinal cord

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

It was found during experiments on isolated frog spinal cord involving extracellular recording from the dorsal roots (sucrose bridging) and intracellular recording from motoneurons by microelectrodes that 10 mM of the M-cholinomimetic arecoline produces motoneuronal depolarization which is matched by depolarizing electronic ventral root potentials and a rise in motoneuronal input resistance. Arecoline changes synaptic transmission by increasing the amplitude of postsynaptic potentials during intracellular recording and that of motoneuronal reflex discharges in the ventral roots but reduces the duration of dorsal root potentials. In the presence of arecoline, L-glutamate-induced motoneuronal response increases. Facilitation of synaptic transmission produced by arecoline in the spinal cord is bound up with cholinergic M2- activation, since it is suppressed by atropine but not by low concentrations of pirenzipine; it is also coupled with a reduction in adenylcyclase activity. When motoneuronal postsynaptic response has been suppressed, as in the case of surplus calcium or theophylline, arecoline produces an inhibitory effect on the amplitude of motoneuronal monosynaptic reflex discharges which is suppressed by pirenzipine at a concentration of 1×10−7 M. This would indicate the presence at the primary afferent terminals of presynaptic cholinergic M1 receptors which mediate its inhibition of impulses of transmitter release. This effect is independent of changes in cyclic nucleotide concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. V. I. Skok, Physiology of the Autonomic Ganglia [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. R. Adams, D. A. Brown, and A. Constanti, "M-current and other potassium currents in bullfrog sympathetic neurones," J. Physiol.,330, 537–572 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. C. Bernardo and D. A. Prince, "Long-term modulation of intrinsic membrane properties of hippocampal neurons," in: Conditioning, Plenum Press, New York (1982), pp. 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. A. Brown, "Slow cholinergic excitation — a mechanism for increasing neuronal excitability," Trends Neurosci.,6, No. 8, 302–307 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. A. Brown and P. R. Adams, "Muscarinic suppression of a novel voltage sensitive K+ current in a vertebrate neurone," Nature,283, No. 2536, 673–676 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. A. Brown and A. Selyanko, "Muscarinic-sensitive membrane currents in rat sympathetic neurons," J. Physiol.,345, 143P (1983).

  7. A. Constanti and D. A. Brown, "M-current in voltage clamped mammalian sympathetic neurones," Neurosci. Lett.,39, No. 1, 65–70 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Constanti and M. Galvan, "M-current in voltage clamped olfactory cortex neurones," Neurosci. Lett.,24, No. 3, 289–294 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. M. H. French-Mullen, N. Hori, H. Nakanishi, et al., "Asymmetric distribution of acetylcholine receptors and M-channels in prepyriform neurons," Cell Mol. Neurobiol.,3, No. 2, 163–181 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Hammer and A. Giachetti, "Muscarinic receptor subtypes: M1 and M2: biochemical and functional characterization," Life Sci.,31, No. 15, 2991–2998 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. K. Harden, L. J. Tanner, M. W. Martin, et al., "Characteristics of two biochemical responses to stimulation of muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Subtypes of muscarinic receptors II," Trends Pharmacol. Sci., Suppl. (1986), pp. 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. McKinney, S. Steinstrom, and E. Richelson, "Muscarinic responses and binding in murine neuroblastoma clone (N1E-115). Mediation of separate responses by high affinity and low affinity agonist-receptor conformation," Mol. Pharmacol.,27, No. 2, 223–235 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. B. Meeker and T. K. Harden, "Muscarinic cholinergic receptor mediated control of cyclic AMP metabolism. Agonist induced changes in nucleotide synthesis and degradation," Mol. Pharmacol.,23, No. 2, 384–392 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Nishizuka, "Turnover of inositol phospholipids and signal transduction," Science,225, No. 4668, 1365–1370 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Nistri and A. Constanti, "Pharmacological characterization of different types of GABA and glutamate receptors in vertebrates and invertebrates," Prog. Neurobiol.,13, No. 2, 117–235 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. A. North, B. E. Slack, and A. Surprenant, "Muscarinic M1 and M2 receptors mediate depolarization and presynaptic inhibition in guinea pig enteric neurons system," J. Physiol.,368, 435–452 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. Novak and R. L. Macdonald, "Muscarinic-sensitive voltage dependent potassium current in cultured murine spinal cord neurons," Neurosci. Lett.,35, No. 1, 85–91 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. C. Olianas, P. Onali, N. H. Neff, and E. Costa, "Adenylate cyclase activity of synaptic membranes from rat striatum. Inhibition by muscarinic receptor agonists," Mol. Pharmacol.,23, No. 2, 393–398 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Repke and I. Wiss, "Regulatory processes at the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor — an approach to a receptor model," Humboldt Univ. Berlin Naturwiss R.,31, No. 5, 525–527 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. K. Wamsley, D. R. Gehlert, W. R. Roeske, and H. I. Yamamura, "Muscarinic antagonists binding site heterogeneity as evidence by autoradiography after labeling with [3H]-qnb and [3H]-pirenzipine," Life Sci.,34, No. 14, 1395–1402 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

A. M. Gorkii Medical Institute, Donetsk. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 399–405, May–June, 1987.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abramets, I.I., Komissarov, I.V. & Samoilovich, I.M. Cholinergic modulation of the synaptic transmission in the frog spinal cord. Neurophysiology 19, 301–307 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01056633

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01056633

Keywords

Navigation