Skip to main content
Log in

Plant wound compounds from oviposition scars used in host discrimination by a stem-galling sawfly

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stem-galling sawfly Euura lasiolepisuses one or more plant wound compounds resulting from oviposition scars as cues in host discrimination (avoiding sites occupied by conspecifics). Four experiments were conducted to test hypotheses about how Euurapartitions resources. Experiment 1 demonstrated that Euuraavoids ovipositing on nodes with scars from previous ovipositions. Experiment 2 showed no evidence that the sawfly uses oviposition-deterring pheromones and indicated there is a time lag following oviposition before the oviposition scar becomes a deterrent. Experiment 3 showed that sawflies avoid artificially formed scars, demonstrating that a plant cue alone can lead to host discrimination. Experiment 4 showed that visual or tactile cues are not necessary for host discrimination and indicated that a plant wound compound functions as an oviposition deterrent. Both experimental results and field surveys showed that Euuraoviposition scars were more uniformly distributed than expected if sawflies were ignoring previous ovipositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benson, W. W., Brown, K. S., and Gilbert, L. E. (1975). Co-evolution of plants and herbivores: Passion flower butterflies.Evolution 29: 659–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, J. E., and Zar, E. H. (1984).Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology, 2nd ed., Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirio, U. (1971). Reperti sul meccanismo stimolo-riposta nell ovideposizione delDacus oleae Gmelin.Redia 52: 577–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, T. P., Price, P. W., and Itami, J. K. (1986). Resource regulation by a stem-galling sawfly on the arroyo willow.Ecology 67: 419–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, T. P., Price, P. W., Waring, G., Clancy, K. M., and Sacchi, C. F. (1988). Forces preventing coevolution in the three trophic level system: Willow, a gall-forming herbivore, and parasitoids. In Spencer, K. (ed.),Chemical Mediation of Coevolution, Academic Press, New York, pp. 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girolami, V., Vianello, A., Strapazzon, A., Ragazzi, E., and Veronese, G. (1981). Ovipositional deterrents inDacus oleae.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 29: 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. R., and Strickler, K. L. (1984). Finding and accepting host plants. In Bell, W. J., and Cardé, R. T. (eds.),Chemical Ecology of Insects, Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., pp. 127–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, P. W., and Clancy, K. M. (1986). Multiple effects of precipitation onSalix lasiolepis and populations of the stem-galling sawfly,Euura lasiolepis.Ecol. Res. 1: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, P. W., and Craig, T. P. (1984). Life history, phenology, and survivorship of a stem-galling sawflyEuura lasiolepis (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), on the arroyo willow,Salix lasiolepis.Ann. Ecol. Soc. Am. 77: 712–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R. J. (1981a). Epideictic pheromones that influence spacing patterns of phytophagous insects. In Nordlund, D. A., Jones, R. L., and Lewis, W. J. (eds.).Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control, Wiley Press, New York, pp. 181–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R. J. (1981b). Oviposition-deterring system of apple maggot flies. In Mitchell, E. R. (ed.),Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 447–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy, R. J., Roitberg, B. D., and Averill, A. L. (1984). Resource partitioning. In Bell, W. J., and Cardé, R. T. (eds.),Chemical Ecology of Insects, Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., pp. 301–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, J. A. A., and Radke, C. D. (1980). An oviposition deterrent associated with frass and feeding larvae of the cabbage looper,Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).Environ. Entomol. 9: 318–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, J. A. A., and Radke, C. D. (1981). Host plant constituents as oviposition deterrents for the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 30: 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, J. A. A., and Radke, C. D. (1982). Activity of cabbage extracts in deterring oviposition by the cabbage looper,Trichoplusia ni. In Visser, J. A., and Minks, A. K. (eds.),Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Insect-Plant Relation., Pudoc, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitberg, B. D., and Prokopy, R. J. (1984). Host discrimination by adult and larval european apple sawfliesHoplocampa testudinea (Klug) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae).Environ. Entomol. 13: 1000–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., and Schoonhoven, L. M. (1977). Assessment of egg load byPieris brassicae.Nature 266: 352–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shurr, K., and Holdaway, F. G. (1970). Olfactory responses of femaleOstrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyraustinae).Entomol. Exp. Appl. 13: 455–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitham, T. G. (1979). Territorial behavior ofPemphigus gall aphids.Nature 279: 324–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. L., Mitchell, E. R., Heath, R. R., and Barfield, C. S. (1986). Oviposition deterrents for fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from larval frass, corn leaves, and artificial diet.Environ. Entomol. 15: 327–330.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Craig, T.P., Itami, J.K. & Price, P.W. Plant wound compounds from oviposition scars used in host discrimination by a stem-galling sawfly. J Insect Behav 1, 343–356 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054497

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054497

Key words

Navigation