Skip to main content
Log in

Development of behavioral competence in youngDrosophila melanogaster adults

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have monitored the ontogeny of several behaviors performed by young Drosophila melanogasteradults. Very young flies are less active than older flies and are less responsive to gravity, light, an odorant, and sucrose applied to their tarsi. In addition, very young males do not consume sucrose or perform any courtship behaviors in response to virgin females, which provide chemical and visual stimuli to courting males. The rate at which flies become maximally competent to respond to stimuli is a function of the behavior. Sensory and motor deficits are not solely responsible for young flies' inability to respond to the stimuli, which suggests that the central nervous system continues to develop after eclosion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, B. S., and Ridge, K. A. (1980). Sex and the single cell. I. On the action of major loci affecting sex determination in Drosophila.Genetics 94: 383–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belote, J. M., and Baker, B. S. (1987). Sexual behavior: Its genetic control during development and adulthood inDrosophila melanogaster.Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. 84: 8026–8030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline, T. C. (1984). Autoregulatory functioning of a Drosophila gene product that establishes and maintains the sexually determined state.Genetics 107: 231–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudei, Y., Jan, Y.-N., Byers, D., Quinn, W. G., and Benzer, S. (1976).dunce, a mutant ofDrosophila deficient in learning.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 73: 1684–1688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, L., and Burnet, B. (1977). Courtship latency in maleDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 7: 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S. C., and Tompkins, L. (1985). An assay to measure the consumption of attractants in solution.Dros. Inform. Serv. 61: 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, R., Finn, J. A., and Hall, J. C. (1980). Acetylcholinesterase mutants in Drosophila and their effects on the structure and function of the central nervous system.J. Comp. Neurol. 189: 741–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. C. (1977). Portions of the central nervous system controlling reproductive behavior inDrosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 7: 291–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. C. (1979). Control of male reproductive behavior by the central nervous system of Drosophila: dissection of a courtship pathway by genetic mosaics.Genetics 92: 437–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. C. (1982). Genetics of the nervous system inDrosophila.Q. Rev. Biophys. 15: 223–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, H. V. B. (1985). The tunable seer: activity-dependent development of vision. In Blass, E. M. (ed.),Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology, Vol. 8, Plenum, New York, pp. 237–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. E. (1980). Influence of β-alanine on the ultrastructure, tanning, and melanization ofDrosophila melanogaster cuticles.Biochem. Genet 18: 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallon, J.-M, and Hotta, Y. (1979). Genetic and behavioral studies of Drosophila female sex appeal.Behav. Genet. 9: 257–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leffelaar, D., and Grigliatti, T. (1984). Age-dependent behavior loss in adultDrosophila melanogaster.Dev. Genet. 4: 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobert, S. P., and Tompkins, L. (1987). The effect of light on the sexual behavior ofDrosophila affinis.Behav. Neural Biol. 47: 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mimura, K. (1986). Development of visual pattern discrimination in the fly depends on experience. Science232: 83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miquel, J., Lundgren, P. R., Bensch, K. G., and Atlan, H. (1976). Effects of temperature on the lifespan, vitality, and fine structure ofDrosophila melanogaster.Mech. Age. Dev. 5: 347–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, L. M., Ford, S. C., and Tompkins, L. (1986). The effects of developmental and environmental temperature on responses ofDrosophila melanogaster adults to sucrose.J. Insect Physiol. 32: 937–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, W. L., and Grabowski, S. R. (1978). Physiology of the visual and flight systems. In Ashburner, M., and Wright, T. R. F. (eds.),The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 2a, Academic Press, New York, pp. 554–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, W. G., and Greenspan, R. J. (1984). Learning and courtship in Drosphila: two stories with mutants.Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 7: 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, W. G., Harris, W. A., and Benzer, S. (1974). Conditioned behavior inDrosophila melanogaster.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 71: 708–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samis, H. V., Rubenstein, B. J., Zajac, L. A., and Hargen, S. M. (1981). Temporal organization and aging inDrosophila melanogaster.Exp. Gerontol. 16: 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilcher, F., and Hall, J. C. (1979). Neural topography of courtship song in sex mosaics ofDrosophila melanogaster.J. Comp. Physiol. 129: 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, R. W., Hall, J. C., Gailey, D. A., and Kyriacou, C. P. (1984). Genetic elements of courtship in Drosophila: Mosaics and learning mutants.Behav. Genet. 14: 383–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. (1915). Experiments on sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection in Drosophila.J. Anim. Behav. 5: 351–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technau, G. M. (1984). Fiber number in the mushroom bodies of adultDrosophila melanogaster depends on age, sex, and experience.J. Neurogen. 1: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L. (1984a). Genetic analysis of sex appeal in Drosophila.Behav. Genet. 14: 411–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L. (1984b). The effect ofSex-lethal mutations on the sexual behavior ofD. melanogaster.Genetics 107: 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L. (1986). Genetic control of sexual behavior inDrosophila melanogaster.Trends Genet. 2: 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L., and Barnhart, K. (1982). A new technique for the proboscis extension assay.Dros. Inform. Serv. 58: 171–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L., Hall, J. C., and Hall, J. M. (1980). Courtship-stimulating volatile compounds from normal and mutant Drosophila.J. Insect Physiol. 26: 689–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, L., Gross, A. C., Hall, J. C., Gailey, D. A., and Siegel, R. W. (1982). The role of female movement in the sexual behaviorof Drosophila melanogaster.Behav. Genet. 12: 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Deceased

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ford, S.C., Napolitano, L.M., McRobert, S.P. et al. Development of behavioral competence in youngDrosophila melanogaster adults. J Insect Behav 2, 575–588 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053355

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053355

Key words

Navigation