Skip to main content
Log in

Functional characteristics and topography of spinal pathways conducting high- and low-threshold startle reflexes

  • Published:
Neurophysiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Electrophysiological and topographical properties of the spinal tract systems involved in two functional types of startle reflexes were studied in chloralose anesthetized cats: a high-threshold reflex produced by intense peripheral nerve stimulation (spinobulbo-spinal, SBS, reflex) and a low-threshold reflex evoked by tactile (T-reflex) and acoustic (A-reflex) stimulation. Maximum conduction velocity of descending transmission of the high-threshold reflex, at 30 m/sec, was perceptibly lower than that of low-threshold reflexes, at 85 m/sec for T-reflex and 100 m/sec for A-reflex. Mean conduction velocity for SBS and T-reflexes were 40.2 and 70.8 m/sec respectively. Perceptible differences were also found in the topography of spinal and especially ascending pathways of these reflexes. It was established by partial spinal cord destruction that accomplishment of T-reflex depended on the integrity of ascending pathways of the dorsal and dorsolateral funiculi and the SBS reflex on preservation of the dorsolateral, ventrolateral and (partially) of ventral funiculi. Descending pathways of the reflexes under study were revealed mainly in the ventrolateral and ventral funiculi and those of the SBS reflex mainly in the first of these. Findings also show the noticeable similarity between the organization of both T- and A-reflex descending pathways. The functional organization of the spinal pathways of a variety of startle reflexes is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. A. P. Gokin, “Levels of transmission of acoustic and tactile “startle reflex“ in the cat reticular formation,” Neirofiziologiya,17, No. 5, 727–731 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. P. Gokin and M. V. Karpukhina, “Reticular structures involved in startle reflexes in response to somatic stimulation of different modalities,” Neirofiziologiya,17, No. 3, 380–390 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. P. Gokin and M. Slovachek, “Reticular structures and reticulo-spinal pathways involved in initiation and inhibition of spino-bulbo-spinal activity,” Neirofiziologiya,8, No. 4, 373–383 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yu. Pavlasek, A. I. Pilyavskii, P. Shtraus, and P. Duda, “Efficacy of synaptic influences of ascending pathways of different spinal cord funiculi on reticulo-spinal neurons in the cat,” Neirofiziologiya,11, No. 3, 254–264 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. N. Preobrazhanskii and Yu. P. Limanskii, “Activation of reticular neurons of the medulla by visceral afferents,” Neirofiziologiya,1, No. 2, 177–184 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Albe-Fessard, A. Levante, and Y. Lamour, “Origin of spinothalamic and spinoreticular pathways in cats and monkeys,” in: Pain, Vol. 4, J. J. Bonica, ed., Raven Press, New York (1974), pp. 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Angaut-Petit, “The dorsal column system. 2. Functional properties and bulbar relay of the postsynaptic fibres of the cat's fasciculus gracilis,” Exp. Brain Res.,22, No. 5, 471–493 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Ascher and K. Segure, “Organisation efférents de la réaction de sursaut du chat anesthésié au chloralose,” J. Physiol.,59, No. 1, 81–100 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. G. Brown and D. N. Franz, “Responses of spinocervical tract neurones to natural stimulation of identified cutaneous receptors,” Exp. Brain Res.,7, No. 3, 231–249 (1969).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Cervero, A. Iggo, and V. Molony, “Responses of spinocervical tract neurones to noxious stimulation of the skin,” J. Physiol.,267, No. 2, 537–558 (1977).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Duda and J. Pavlasek, “Localization of intraspinal longitudinal systems participating in the spreading of visceromotor activity,” Physiol. Bohemosl.,26, No. 2, 149–157 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. P. Gokin, P. G. Kostyuk, and N. N. Preobrazhensky, “Neuronal mechanisms of interactions of high-threshold visceral and somatic afferent influences in spinal cord and medulla,” J. Physiol.,73, No. 2, 319–333 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. L. Fields, G. M. Wagner, and S. D. Andersson, “Some properties of spinal neurones projecting to the medial brain-stem reticular formation,” Exp. Neurol.,47, No. 1, 118–134 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. H. L. Fields and D. L. Winter, “Somatovisceral pathways: rapidly conducting fibres in the spinal cord,” Science,167, No. 3926, 1729–1730 (1970).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. L. H. Haber, B. D. Moore, and W. D. Willis, “Electrophysiological response properties of spinoreticular neurons in the monkey,” J. Comp. Neurol.,207, No. 1, 75–84 (1982).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. H. G. J. M. Kuypers and V. A. Maisky, “Funicular trajectories of descending brainstem pathways in the cat,” Brain Res.,136, No. 2, 159–165 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Landis and W. Hunt, The Startle Pattern, Farrar and Rinehart, New York (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G.-W. Lu, G. J. Bennett, and N. Nishikawa, “Spinal neurons with branches axons travelling in both the dorsal and dorsolateral funiculi,” Exp. Neurol.,87, No. 3, 571–577 (1985).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. R. A. Maunz, N. G. Pitts, and B. W. Peterson, “Cat spinoreticular neurons: location, responses and changes in responses during repetitive stimulation,” Brain Res.,148, No. 2, 365–379 (1978).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Shimamura, I. Kogure, and Y. Igusa, “Ascending spinal tracts of the spino-bulbo-spinal reflex in cat,” Jpn. J. Physiol.,26, No. 6, 577–589 (1976).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Shimamura and I. Kogure, “Reticulospinal tracts involved in the spino-bulbo-spinal reflex in the cats,” Brain Res.,172, No. 1, 13–21 (1979).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. M. Shimamura and R. B. Livingston, “Longitudinal conduction systems serving spinal and brain-stem coordination,” J. Neurophysiol.,26, No. 2, 258–272 (1963).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Shimamura and T. Yamauchi, “Neural mechanisms of the chloralose jerk with special reference to its relationship with the spino-bulbo-spinal reflex,” Jap. J. Physiol.,17, No. 6, 738–745 (1967).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. I. Szabo and K. Hazafi, “Elicitability of the acoustic startle reaction after brain stem lesions,” Acta Physiol. Acad. Sci. Hung.,27, No. 2, 155–165 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ch. G. Wright and Ch. D. Barnes, “Audiospinal responses in decerebrate and chloralose anesthetized cats,” Brain Res.,36, No. 2, 307–331 (1972).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

A. A. Bogomolets Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Kiev. Translated from Neirofiziologiya, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 486–496, July–August, 1986.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gokin, A.P. Functional characteristics and topography of spinal pathways conducting high- and low-threshold startle reflexes. Neurophysiology 18, 353–361 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052804

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052804

Keywords

Navigation