Skip to main content
Log in

Actual vs perceived profitability: A study of floral choice of honey bees

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between actual and perceived profitability was investigated by quantifying choice behavior of foraging honey bees (Apis mellifera).Rate of net energy gain was used as a measure of profitability. Individual bees repeatedly chose between a yellow and a blue tubular artificial flower which had different associated profitabilities. Handling costs were manipulated by using flowers of different depth;energy gains were manipulated by using different volumes of a 20% (w/w) sucrose solution. Bees' discrimination between the two flowers increased as the absolute difference in profitabilities increased and discrimination decreased as profitabilities of both flowers increased. Therefore, discrimination depended on the relative difference in profitability between flowers, and therefore, perception was a nonlinear function of actual rates of net energy gain. The results also suggested that motivation to choose between flowers depended on the level of profitability. We suggest that nonlinear perceptual scales and motivation should be incorporated into models of food choice as constraints and should be considered in the design of experiments used to test predictions of models and in the interpretation of experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carterette, E. C., and Friedman, M. P. (1974).Handbook of Perception, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elner, R. W., and Hughes, R. N. (1978). Energy maximization in the diet of the shore crab,Carcinus maenus.J. Anim. Ecol. 7: 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B. (1975). Energetics of pollination.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6: 139–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B. (1979). “Majoring” and “minoring” by foraging bumblebees,Bombus vagans: An experimental analysis.Ecology 60: 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B. (1980). Mechanisms of body-temperature regulation in honeybees,Apis mellifera. II. Regulation of thoracic temperature at high air temperatures.J. Exp. Biol. 85: 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernstein, R. J., and van Sommers, P. (1962). Method for sensory scaling with animals.Science 135: 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F. N. (1974). Overview of psychophysical scaling methods. In Carterette, E. C., and Friedman, M. P. (eds.),Handbook of Perception, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 343–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marden, J. H., and Waddington, K. D. (1981). Floral choices by honeybees in relation to the relative distances to flowers.Physiol. Entomol. 6: 431–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W., and Krebs, J. R. (1986).Foraging Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W., and Paton, S. R. (1986). How constant is the constant of risk-aversion?Anim. Behav. 34: 1659–1667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1961). To honor Fechner and repeal his law.Science 133: 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decision and choice.Science 211: 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, K. D. (1985). Cost-intake information used in foraging.J. Insect Physol. 31: 891–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, K. D., and Holden, L. R. (1979). Optimal foraging: On flower selection by bees.Am. Nat. 114: 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weast, R. C. (ed.) (1987).CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 68th ed., CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waddington, K.D., Gottlieb, N. Actual vs perceived profitability: A study of floral choice of honey bees. J Insect Behav 3, 429–441 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052010

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052010

Key words

Navigation