Skip to main content
Log in

Substitution rates as measures of the relative effectiveness of alternative phosphorus fertilizers

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A procedure for representing the effectiveness of fertilizers relative to a standard fertilizer by the estimation of substitution rates is demonstrated with yield data from a fertilizer experiment with triple superphosphate and a partially acidulated rock phosphate. The substitution rate is estimated by an iterative regression procedure and the accuracy of the estimate indicated by a 5% confidence interval.

The use of substitution rates to evaluate fertilizers depends on the assumption that the standard and alternative fertilizers differ in their effects on crop growth only because of differences in content of available nutrient. This assumption is tested as a statistical hypothesis.

Substitution rates calculated from experimental data with rates of application of the fertilizers represented in terms of chemical analysis of the fertilizers, indicate the usefulness of the analyses as measures of the available nutrient content of the fertilizers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AOAC (1975) Official methods of analysis, 12th edn. Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists

    Google Scholar 

  2. Colwell JD (1978) Computations for studies of soil fertility and fertilizer requirements. Slough: Commonwealth Agric Bur/Melbourne: CSIRO

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colwell JD (1983) Fertilizer requirements. In: Soils: An Australian viewpoint. Division of Soils, CSIRO, pp. 795–815, Melbourne: CSIRO/London: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colwell JD (1985) Fertilizing programs. I. Variability in responses of successive crops to fresh and previous applications of phosphorus fertilizer, in Australia and Brazil. Fert Res 8: 21–38

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooke GW and Widdowson FV (1959) Field experiments on phosphate fertilizers. J Agric Sci 53: 46–63

    Google Scholar 

  6. Draper NR and Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goebert WJ Rein TA and Souza DMG (1987) An evaluation of phosphate fertilizer sources for crop production in a Cerrado soil (in preparation)

  8. Palmer B Bolland MOA and Gilkes RJ (1979) A re-evaluation of the effectiveness of calcined Christmss Island C-grade rock phosphate. Aust J Exper Agric Anim Husb 19: 605–610

    Google Scholar 

  9. Patterson HD and Williams R (1962) The residual effects of phosphorus fertilizers on yield of arable crops: preliminary results of six rotation experiments. Exper Husb 8: 85–103, London: HMSO

    Google Scholar 

  10. Soil Survey Staff (1975) Soil taxonomy — a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Washington DC: USDA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas GW and Peaslee DE (1973) Testing soil for phosphorus. In: Walsh LM and Beaton JD (eds) Soil testing and plant analysis, pp. 115–132. Madison, Wisc: American Society of Agronomy

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colwell, J.D., Goedert, W.J. Substitution rates as measures of the relative effectiveness of alternative phosphorus fertilizers. Fertilizer Research 15, 163–172 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01050678

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01050678

Keywords

Navigation