Skip to main content
Log in

Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections?

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A view of organizations as social contracts recognizes self-interests of individuals but does not explain the occurrence of unselfish contributions such as are denoted by “organizational citizenship behavior” (OCB). We propose that the concept of fairness, as applied to systems of relational contracts, provides a high-leverage construct for understanding the fusion of self-interest and self-denial. A review of the empirical literature suggests that fairness, rather than job satisfaction, accounts for OCB; and that the evidence points toward procedural and interactional fairness as both empirically and conceptually critical in the fairness-OCB relationship. However, we explain why distributive fairness still should not be deemphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., and Bazerman, M. H. (eds.),Research on Negotiations in Organizations, Vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., and Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 173–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, J. E., and Carrell, M. R. (1979). Organizational equity perceptions, employee job satisfaction, and departmental absence and turnover rates.Organ. Behav. Human Perform. 24: 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farh, J., Podsakoff, P. M., and Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction.J. Manage. 16: 705–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In Staw, B. M., and Cummings, L. L. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, pp. 111–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C., Organ, D. W., and Crooker, K. (1992). Time pressure, Type A syndrome, and organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University Bloomington.

  • Kabanoff, B. (1991). Equity, equality, power, and conflict.Acad. Manage. Rev. 16: 416–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., and Kahn, R. L. (1978).The Social Psychology of Organizations, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, M. (1988).A Social-Contract Theory of Organizations, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., and Folger, R. (1991). The effects of procedural and distributive justice on organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished manuscript, A. B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landy, F., and Becker, W. S. (1987). Motivation theory reconsidered. In Cummings, L. L. and Staw, B. M. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., and Meindl, J. R. (1981). Justice and altruism. In Rushton, J. P., and Sorrentino, R. M. (eds.),Altruism and Helping Behavior, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with Equity Theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen, K. G., Greenberg, M. S., and Willis, R. H. (eds.),Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 27–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., and Earley, P. C. (1991). Some thoughts on self and group interests: A parallel-processor model. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meeting, Miami Beach, FL

  • Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988).The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, I. R. (1985). Relational contract: What we do and do not know.Wiscon. Law. Rev. 483–525.

  • Meindl, J. (1989). Managing to be fair: An exploration of values, motives, and leadership.Admin. Sci. Quart. 34: 252–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?J. Appl. Psychol. 76: 845–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff, B. P., and Moorman, R. H. (1991). Fairness in performance monitoring: The role of justice in mediating the relationship between monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviors. Unpublished manuscript, Kansas State University, Manhattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988).Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1989). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In Staw, B. M., and Cummings, L. L. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 12, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1990). Fairness, productivity, and organizational citizenship behavior: Tradeoffs in student and manager pay decisions. Paper presented at Academy of Management meetings, San Francisco.

  • Organ, D. W., and Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior.J. Appl. Psychol. 74: 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W., Lingl, A., and Hui, C. (1992). Personality, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts.J. Organ. Behav. 11: 389–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., and Parks, J. M. (1992). The contracts of individuals and organizations. In Cummings, L. L., and Staw, B. M. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 15, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, R. W., Cooper, E. A., and McKenna, J. F. (1987). Referent selection in determining equity perceptions: Differential effects on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes.Person. Psychol. 40: 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., and Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents.J. Appl. Psychol. 68: 653–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M., Bell, N. E., and Clausen, J. A. (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime longitudinal test.Adminis. Sci. Quart. 31: 56–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Organ, D.W., Moorman, R.H. Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections?. Soc Just Res 6, 5–18 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048730

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048730

Key words

Navigation