Skip to main content
Log in

Recognition of heterospecific parasitism: Competition between Aphidiid (Aphidius ervi) and Aphelinid (Aphelinus asychis) parasitoids of Aphids (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae; Aphelinidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The solitary parasitoids Aphidius erviHaliday (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) and Aphelinus asychisWalker (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) attacked but generally did not oviposit in pea aphids parasitized by the other species. Wasps selectively oviposited in unparasitized hosts when given a choice. Host discrimination depended on the recognition of internal cues. Females of A. asychiseither could not recognize or ignored A. ervi'sexternal host marking pheromone. Under most conditions, A. ervisurvived in superparasitized hosts, killing competing A. asychislarvae by physical attack and possibly physiological suppression. The outcome of larval competition was not affected by oviposition sequence or age difference between larvae; A. asychissurvived only when it had substantially completed larval development before the host was superparasitized by A. ervi.It is suggested that competition for host resources incurs a cost, for the winner in terms of reduced size or increased development time and for the loser in terms of lost progeny and searching time. Consequently, heterospecific host discrimination can be functional. Internal, and probably general, cues enable wasps to recognize and avoid oviposition in hosts already parasitized by an unrelated species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai, B., and Mackauer, M. (1990a). Host discrimination by the aphid parasitoidAphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): When superparasitism is not adaptive.Can. Entomol. 122: 363–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, B., and Mackauer, M. (1990b). Oviposition and host-feeding patterns byAphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) at different aphid densities.Ecol. Entomol. 15: 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K., van Alphen, J. J. M., van Batenburg, F. H. D., van der Hoeven, N., Nell, H. W., van Strien-van Liempt, W. F. T. H., and Turlings, T. C. J. (1985). The function of host discrimination and superparasitism in parasitoids.Oecologia 67: 572–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, R. L. (1972). Effectiveness of paralyzing venom and its relation to host discrimination by braconid wasps.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 90–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckage, N. E., and Templeton, T. J. (1986). Physiological effects of parasitism byApanteles congregatus in terminal-stage tobacco hornworm larvae.J. Insect Physiol. 32: 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosque, C., and Rabinovich, J. E. (1979). Population dynamics ofTelenomus fariai (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), a parasite of Chagas' disease vectors. VII. Oviposition behavior and host discrimination.Can. Entomol. 111: 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, H., and Barrows, E. M. (1978). Oviposition and host feeding behavior ofAphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae) onSchizaphis graminum (Homoptera: Aphididae) and some reactions of aphids to this parasite.Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 80: 441–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, D. J., and van den Bosch, R. (1972). Behaviour and biology ofMonoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasite of dactynotine aphids.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 773–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, F. J., and Mackauer, M. (1986). Host discrimination and larval competition in the aphid parasiteEphedrus californicus.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 41: 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier, C. (1986). Amino acid utilization in the aphidAcyrthosiphon pisum infected by the parasitoidAphidius smithi.J. Insect Physiol. 32: 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier, C., and Mackauer, M. (1979). The effect of parasitism byAphidius smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) on the food budget of the pea aphid,Acyrthosiphon pisum (Homoptera: Aphididae).Can. J. Zool. 57: 1605–1611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. C. (1971). Aspects of the physiology of endoparasitic Hymenoptera.Biol. Rev. 46: 243–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Force, D. C., and Messenger, P. S. (1965). Laboratory studies on competition among three parasites of the spotted alfalfa aphidTherioaphis maculata (Buckton).Ecology 46: 853–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. M., Ward, S. A., and Dixon, A. F. G. (1984). Limitation of superparasitism byAphidius rhopalosiphi: A consequence of aphid defensive behaviour.Ecol. Entomol. 9: 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling, D., Roitberg, B. D., and Mackauer, M. (1990). Instar-specific defense of the pea aphid,Acyrthosiphon pisum: Influence on oviposition success of the parasiteAphelinus asychis (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae).J. Insect Behav. 3: 501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, E. A. (1922). Some bionomics ofAphelinus semiflavus (Howard) chalcid parasite of aphids.Ohio J. Sci. 22: 209–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawlitzky, N., and Boulay, C. (1986). Effects of the egg-larval parasite,Phanerotoma flavitestacea Fisch. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) on the dry weight and chemical composition of its hostAnagasta kuehniella Zell. (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae).J. Insect Physiol. 32: 269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofsvang, T. (1988). Mechanisms of host discrimination and intraspeciflc competition in the aphid parasitoidEphedrus cerasicola.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 48: 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofsvang, T., and Hågvar, E. B. (1986). Oviposition behaviour ofEphedrus cerasicola (Hym: Aphidiidae) parasitizing different instars of its aphid host.Entomophaga 31: 261–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, S. F., Marris, G., Reynolds, A., and Rowe, G. W. (1987). Adaptive patterns in the avoidance of superparasitism by solitary parasitic wasps.J. Anim. Ecol. 56: 387–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (1985). The endocrine basis for developmentally stationary prepupae in larvae ofTrichoplusia ni pseudoparasitized byChelonus insularis.J. Comp. Physiol. 155: 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D., Jones, G., Rudnicka, M., Click, A., Reck-Malleczewen, V., and Iwaya, M. (1986). Pseudoparasitism of hostTrichoplusia ni byChelonus spp. as a new model system for parasite regulation of host physiology.J. Insect Physiol. 32: 315–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer, M. (1972). Antennal amputation as a method for bio-marking aphids.J. Econ. Entomol. 65: 1725–1727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer, M. (1990). Host discrimination and larval competition in solitary endoparasitoids. In Mackauer, M., Ehler, L. E., and Roland, J. (eds.),Critical Issues in Biological Control, Intercept, Andover, Hants., pp. 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer, M., and Chow, F. J. (1986). Parasites and parasite impact. In McLean, G. D., Garrett, R. G., and Ruesink, W. G. (eds.),Plant Virus Epidemics: Monitoring, Modelling and Predicting Outbreaks, Academic Press, Sydney, pp. 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer, M., and Chow, F. J. (1990). The effect of stinging: Aphidiid parasitoids (Hymenoptera) “prefer” pseudoparasitized pea aphids.Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Ges. (in press).

  • McBrien, H., and Mackauer, M. (1990). Heterospecific larval competition and host discrimination in two species of aphid parasitoids:Aphidius ervi andAphidius smithi.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 56: 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBrien, H., and Mackauer, M. (1991). Decision to superparasitize based on larval survival: Competition between aphid parasitoidsAphidius ervi andAphidius smithi. Entomol. Exp. Appl. (in press).

  • Price, P. W. (1970). Trail odors: Recognition by insects parasitic on cocoons.Science 170: 546–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabb, R. L., and Bradley, J. R. (1970). Marking host eggs byTelenomus sphingis.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 63: 1053–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G. (1937). The sense used byTrichogramma to distinguish between parasitized and unparasitized hosts.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 122: 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, 2nd ed., W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoltz, D. B. (1986). Interactions between parasitoid-derived products and host insects: An overview.J. Insect Physiol. 32: 347–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, M. R. (1986). Physiological interactions of parasitoids with their hosts and their influence on reproductive strategies. In Waage, J., and Greathead, D. (eds.),Insect Parasitoids, Academic Press, London, pp. 97–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto, T., Uenichi, M., and Machida, F. (1986). Foraging for patchily-distributed leaf-miners by the parasitoid,Dapsilarthra rufiventris (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). I. Discrimination of previously searched leaflets.Appl. Entomol. Zool. 21: 500–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takasu, K., and Hirose, Y. (1988). Host discrimination in the parasitoidOoencyrtus nezarae: The role of the egg stalk as an external marker.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47: 45–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. N. (1986). Effect of the insect parasiteHyposoter exiguae (Viereck) on the carbohydrate metabolism of its host,Trichoplusia ni (Hubner).J. Insect Physiol. 32: 287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turlings, T. J. C., van Batenburg, F. D. H., and van Strien-van Liempt, W. T. F. H. (1985). Why is there no interspecific host discrimination in the two coexisting larval parasitoids ofDrosophila species;Leptopilina heterotoma (Thomson) andAsobara tabida (Nees).Oecologia 67: 352–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Alphen, J. J. M. (1988). Patch time allocation by insect parasitoids: Superparasitism and aggregation. In de Jong, G. (ed.).Population Genetics and Evolution, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Alphen, J. J. M., and Visser, M. E. (1990). Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lenteren, J. C. (1981). Host discrimination by parasitoids. In Nordlund, D. A., Jones, R. L., and Lewis, W. J. (eds.),Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control, Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp. 153–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Strien-van Liempt, W. T. F. H., and van Alphen, J. J. M. (1981). The absence of interspecific host discrimination inAsobara tabida Nees andLeptopilina heterotoma (Thomson), coexisting larval parasitoids ofDrosophila species.Neth. J. Zool. 31: 701–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vet, L. E. M., Meyer, M., Bakker, K., and van Alphen, J. J. M. (1984). Intra- and interspecific host discrimination inAsobara (Hymenoptera) larval endo-parasitoids of Drosophilidae: Comparison between closely related and less closely related species.Anim. Behav. 32: 871–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, M. E., van Alphen, J. J. M., and Nell, H. W. (1990). Adaptive superparasitism and patch time allocation in solitary parasitoids: The influence of the number of parasitoids depleting a patch.Behavior 114: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W., and Mackauer, M. (1990). Age-specific pattern of host discrimination by the aphid parasitoidEphedrus californicus Baker (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae).Can. Entomol. 122: 349–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbert, H. (1964). Das Ausleseverhalten vonAphelinus semiflavus Howard und die Abwehrreaktionen seiner Wirte.Beitr. Entomol. 14: 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bai, B., Mackauer, M. Recognition of heterospecific parasitism: Competition between Aphidiid (Aphidius ervi) and Aphelinid (Aphelinus asychis) parasitoids of Aphids (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae; Aphelinidae). J Insect Behav 4, 333–345 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048282

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048282

Key words

Navigation