Skip to main content
Log in

Intraspecific variability in the tapping behavior of the deathwatch beetle,Xestobium rufovillosum (Coleoptera: Anobiidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taps were recorded from 46 male and 30 female deathwatch beetles, Xestobium rufovillosum.Beetles tap by striking the frons of the head on the substrate 4–11 times, at a frequency of about 11 Hz. There were no significant differences between the sexes in the number of strikes per tap, or in the frequency of the strikes, although there was significant variation between individuals of both sexes in both of these parameters. Males usually initiate a sequence of taps, to which females reply. Females responded more readily to male beetle taps containing high strike numbers. Use of an artificial tapper showed that females responded most to taps containing at least six strikes. Females did not discriminate between male beetle taps on the basis of strike frequency, although at abnormally high (20-Hz) or low (4-Hz) frequencies produced by the artificial tapper, females were less likely to respond. Male beetles located the source of taps from the artificial tapper and did this more readily with taps of a high strike number. It is not clear why some males produce taps with fewer than six strikes, as these are unlikely to elicit a female response, and so should be the subject of adverse sexual selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barr, B. A. (1969). Sound production in Scotylidae (Coleoptera) with emphasis on the genusIps. Can. Entomol. 101:636–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M. C., and Keenlyside, J. J. (1991). Tapping behavior is a rhythmic communication in the deathwatch beetle,Xestobium rufovillosum (Coleoptera: Anobiidae).J. Insect Behav. 4: 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M. C., and Menendez, G. (1991). Knocking on wood for a mate.New Sci. 1776: 42–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M. C., and White, P. R. (1988). Responses of flying maleAnobium punctatum (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) to female sex pheromone in a wind-tunnel.J. Insect Behav. 1: 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, R. A. (1981).The Biology of the Coleoptera, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cymorek, S. (1960). Über das Paarungsverhalten und zur Biologie des HolzschäsingsPtilinus pectinicornis L. (Coleoptera: Anobiidae). XI International Kongress Für Entomologie, Wien.Verhandlangen 2: 335–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. C. (1937). Studies of the biology of the death-watch beetle,Xestobium rufovillosum De G. I. A summary of past work and a brief account of the developmental stages.Ann. Appl. Biol. 24: 600–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. C. (1938). Studies of the biology of the death-watch beetle,Xestobium rufovillosum De G. II. The habits of the adult with special reference to the factors affecting oviposition.Ann. Appl. Biol. 25: 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson, D., Birch, M. C., and Wyatt, T. D. (1993a). Mate location in the deathwatch beetle,Xestobium rufovillosum De Geer (Anobiidae): Orientation to substrate vibrations.Anim. Behav. (in press).

  • Goulson, D., Birch, M. C., and Wyatt, T. D. (1993b). Paternal investment in relation to size in the deathwatch beetle,Xestobium rufovillosum (Coleoptera: Anobiidae), and evidence for female selection for large mates.J. Insect Behav. 6: 539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C. S. (1980). The importance of low-frequency, substrate-borne sounds in lacewing communication (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 73: 617–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickin, N. E. (1963).The Insect Factor in Wood Decay, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howse, P. E. (1964). The significance of the sound produced by the termiteZootermopsis angus-ticollis (Hagen).Anim. Behav. 12: 284–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, T. (1976). Mutual communication by substrate vibrations in the mating behavior of planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae).Appl. Entomol. Zool. 11: 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishay, J., and Schwarz, J. (1965). On the nature of the sounds produced within the nest of the Oriental HornetVespa oriental F.Ins. Soc. 12: 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, F. (1973). Stridulation and communication by substrate vibration inGeocarcinus lateralis (Crustacea: Decapoda).J. Comp. Physiol. 83: 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausnitzer, B. (1983).Beetles, Exeter Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, H. Z., and Levinson, A. R. (1987). Pheromone biology of the tobacco beetle (Lasioderma serricorne F., Anobiidae) with notes on the pheromone antagonism between 4S,6S,7S-and 4S,6S,7R-serricornin.J. Appl. Entomol. 103: 217–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lighten, J. R. B. (1987). Cost of tokking: The energetics of substrate communication in the tok-tok beetle, Psammodes striatus.J. Comp. Physiol. B 157: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mook, J. H., and Bruggemann, C. G. (1968). Acoustic communication byLipura lucens (Diptera: Chloropidae).Entomol. Exp. Appl. 11: 397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearman, J. V. (1928). Sound production organ in the Psocoptera.Entomol. Mon. Mag. 64: 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovner, J. S., and Barth, F. G. (1981). Vibratory communication through living plants in the tropical wandering spider.Science 214: 464–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudinsky, J. A., and Michael, R. R. (1972). Sound production in Scolytidae: Chemostimulus of sonic signal by the Douglas-Fir beetle.Science 175: 1386–1390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. W., and Maketon, M. (1990). Intraspecific variation and information content of drumming in three Plecoptera species. In Campbell, I. C. (ed.),Mayflies and Stoneflies, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, pp. 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel, W. R., and Doyen, J. T. (1976). Sound production by substratal tapping in beetles of the genusEusattus (Tentyriidae: Coniontini). Coleopt. Bull.30: 331–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumlinson, J. H. (1985). Beetles: Pheromonal chemists par excellence. In Hedin, P. A. (ed.),Bioregulators for Pest Control, ACS Symposium, Washington, DC, Series No. 276, pp. 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, M. M., and Henry, C. S. (1992). Behavioral responses of green lacewings (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae, Chrysoperla) to synthetic mating songs.Anim. Behav. 44: 641–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. R., and Birch, M. C. (1987). Female sex pheromone of the common furniture beetle,Anobium punctatum (Coleoptera: Anobiidae): Extraction, identification and bioassays.J. Chem. Ecol. 13: 1695–1706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, R. S. (1972). Communication by surface waves: Mating behavior of the water signal (Gerridae).J. Comp. Physiol. 80: 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. (1668).An Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language, Royal Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachariassen, K. E. (1976). Communication by sound between desert tenebrionids.Norw. J. Ento-mol. 24: 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, P.R., Birch, M.C., Church, S. et al. Intraspecific variability in the tapping behavior of the deathwatch beetle,Xestobium rufovillosum (Coleoptera: Anobiidae). J Insect Behav 6, 549–562 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048122

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048122

Key words

Navigation