Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing explicit to generalized requesting in an augmentative communication mode

  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study compared explicit to more generalized requesting strategies. Four adults with multiple disabilities were taught to request preferred objects by pointing to line drawings. Explicit requests were followed by access to a single specific item. Generalized requests were followed by access to any one of three related items. Percent of correct explicit and generalized requests were compared across sets of objects in a multiple-probe, single-subject design. Correct requests increased as a function of intervention, with little consistent advantage for one type of requesting strategy over the other. Analysis of error patterns suggested that while learners acquired reliable discriminations among the graphic symbols across object sets, establishing the conditional discriminations within each set proved difficult. Ecological factors for the selection of a requesting strategy and the sequencing of intervention are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anglin, J. M. (1977).Word, Object and Conceptual Development, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (1979).Learning, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. R., Davies, C. O., and Woodcock, R. W. (1974).Standard Rebus Glossary, American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egel, A. L. (1980). The effects of constant vs. varied reinforcer presentation on responding by autistic children.J. Exp. Child Psychol. 30: 455–463.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egel, A. L. (1981). Reinforcer variation: Implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 14: 345–350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glennen, S. L., and Calculator, S. N. (1985). Training functional communication board use: A pragmatic approach.Augment. Alt. Commun. 1: 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess, D. (1969). A functional analysis of receptive language and productive speech: Acquisition of the plural morpheme.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2: 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess, D., and Baer, D. M. (1973). An analysis of individual differences in generalization between receptive and productive language in retarded children.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 6: 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. and Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations.Anl. Verb. Behav. 5: 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. D., and Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple-baseline.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 11: 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., Bellamy, G. T., and Colvin, G. T. (1984). Responding in the presence of nontrained stimuli: Implications of generalization error patterns.J. Assoc. Pers. Sev. Hand. 9: 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, R. H., and Budd, C. (1985). Acquisition of manual sign use: Collateral reduction of maladaptive behavior and factors limiting generalizations.Ed. Train. Ment. Retard. 20: 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (1981).The Picture Communication Symbols, Mayer-Johnson Company, Salana Beach, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarre, J., and Holland, J. G. (1985). The functional independence of mands and tacts.J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 43: 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L. (1978). Teaching generalized receptive and productive behind-front discriminations to two retarded children.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 11: 529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. L. (1981). Prepositional phrases spoken and heard.J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 35: 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litt, M., and Schreibamn, L. (1981). Stimulus-specific reinforcement in the acquisition of receptive labels by autistic children.Anal. Intervent. Devel. Dis. 1: 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1988). Establishing operations and the mand.Anal. Verb. Behav. 6: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. A., Cuvo, A. J., and Borakove, L. S. (1977). Teaching naming of coin values-comprehension before production versus production alone.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 10: 735–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., and Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 18: 249–255.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., and Brown, L. (1986). Teaching the use of a multi-page direct selection communication board to an adult with autism.J. Assoc. Pers. Sev. Hand. 11: 68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., Lindamood, L., and Sigafoos, J. (1986). The match between reinforcer class and response class: Its influence on communication intervention strategies.J. Assoc. Pers. Sev. Hand. 11: 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., Rogers, N., and Barrett, C. (1984). Establishing pragmatic discrimination among the communicative functions of requesting, rejecting, and commenting in an adolescent.J. Assoc. Pers. Sev. Hand. 9: 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., Sigafoos, J., and Piché, L. (1989). Teaching an adolescent with blindness and severe disabilities: A correspondence between requesting and selecting preferred objects.J. Assoc. Pers. Sev. Hand. 14: 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., York, J., and Sigafoos, J. (1991).Implementing Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Strategies for Learners with Severe Disabilities, Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. H., and Hurlbut, B. (1977). Teaching nonvocal communication skills to multihandicapped retarded adults.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 10: 591–603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., and Pate, J. L. (1988). Establishment of symbolic communication in persons with severe mental retardation.J. Speech Hear. Dis. 53: 94–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, K. J., and Spradlin, J. E. (1989). Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded adults: The effects of training the component simple discriminations.J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 52: 1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, R., and Sailor, W. (1979). A comparison of three strategies of reinforcement on two choice learning problems with severely retarded children.AAESPH Rev. 4: 323–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1984). Verbal behavior at a procedural level in the chimpanzee.J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 41: 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1960).Tactics of Scientific Research, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, G. M., and Vogt, M. C. (1984). Pluraliation instruction in comprehension and production.J. Speech Hear. Dis. 49: 128–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigafoos, J., Doss, S., and Reichle, J. (1989). Developing mand and tact repertoires in persons with severe developmental disabilities using graphic symbols.Res. Devel. Dis. 10: 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigafoos, J., Reichle, J., Doss, S., Hall, K., and Pettitt, L. (1990). ‘Spontaneous’ transfer of stimulus control from tact to mand contingencies.Res. Devel. Dis. 11: 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957).Verbal Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snell, M. E. (Eds.) (1983).Systematic Instruction of the Moderately and Severely Handicapped (second edition), Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Striefel, S., and Owens, C. R. (1980). Transfer of stimulus control procedures: Applications to language acquisition training with the developmentally handicapped.Behav. Res. Sev. Devel. Dis. 1: 307–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watters, R. G., Wheeler, L. J., and Watters, W. E. (1981). The relative efficiency of two orders for training autistic children in the expressive and receptive use of manual signs.J. Commun. Dis. 14: 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Based on a dissertation submitted by the first author to the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sigafoos, J., Reichle, J. Comparing explicit to generalized requesting in an augmentative communication mode. J Dev Phys Disabil 4, 167–188 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046398

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046398

Key Words

Navigation