Skip to main content
Log in

Stimulus control analysis and treatment of noncompliant behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Noncompliance to requests is a behavior commonly exhibited by persons with developmental disabilities. Typically, differential reinforcement procedures, combined with response contingent consequences, are employed to manage noncompliance. An option to traditional operant methodologies is a stimulus control approach whereby various antecedent events are manipulated in an effort to set the occasion for compliant behavior. This study demonstrates how the noncompliant behavior (i.e., dropping to the ground and refusing to walk after exiting a van) of a multiply handicapped young adult was eliminated as a result of a compliance shaping intervention. A stimulus control analysis suggested that all elements of the intervention were critical to the success of the program. Follow-up assessment conducted 6 months after completion of training revealed maintenance of treatment effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Horner, R. H., Day, H. M., Sprague, J. R., O'Brien, M., and Heathfield, L. T. (1991). Interspersed requests: A nonaversive procedure for reducing aggression and self-injury during instruction.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 24: 265–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luiselli, J. K. (1990). Recent developments in nonaversive treatment: A review of rationale, methods, and recommendations. In Repp, A. C., and Singh, N. N. (eds.),Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive and Aversive Interventions for Persons with Development Disabilities, Sycamore Publishing, Sycamore, IL, pp. 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E., and Brown, D. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 21: 123–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, J. M., Cataldo, M. F., Kolko, D. J., Neef, N. N., and Egel, A. L. (1986). Experimental analysis of response covariation among compliant and inappropriate behaviors.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 19: 241–254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, A. C., and Singh, N. N. (1990). (Eds.).Perspectives on the Use of Nonaversive and Aversive Interventions for Persons with Developmental Disabilities, Sycamore Publishing, Sycamore, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, D. C., Cataldo, M. F., and Cushing, P. J. (1981). Compliance training and behavioral covariation in the treatment of multiple behavior problems.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 14: 209–222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, G. H. S., Singer, J., and Horner, R. H. (1987). Use of pretask requests to increase the probability of compliance for students with severe disabilities.J. Assoc. Pers. Sev. Hand. 12: 287–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slifer, K. J., Ivancic, M. T., Parrish, J. M., and Burgio, L. D. (1986). Assessment and treatment of multiple behavior problems exhibited by a profoundly retarded adolescent.J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 17: 203–213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer-Azaroff, B., and Mayer, G. R. (1991).Behavior Analysis for Lasting Change, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Psychological and Educational Resource Associates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cameron, M.J., Luiselli, J.K., McGrath, M. et al. Stimulus control analysis and treatment of noncompliant behavior. J Dev Phys Disabil 4, 141–150 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046396

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046396

Key Words

Navigation