Skip to main content
Log in

Economics of fire technology

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we explain cost-benefit terms and how they apply to fire safety, then summarize the findings of several social fire safety cost-benefit analyses we have done in Sweden. We have found that smoke detectors and portable fire extinguishers are useful in the average single-family home, but sprinklers are not. Sprinkler systems are very helpful in the average manufacturing industry but too expensive. In most chemical plants, however, they are profitable. Sprinklers in the average hotel have higher costs than expected benefits and therefore are not profitable. In health-care facilities, particularly psychiatric wards, they are profitable. Our research also shows that chimney sweeping is carried out too frequently in Sweden and that in new residential areas, water from tanker vehicles is more effective against fires than water from hydrants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swedish Rescue Services Board,Optimal Fire Safety: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Certain Fire Safety Measures: A Comparision of Fire Service Costs in Six Countries, publication scheduled for 1995, Karlstad, Sweden.

  2. Gramlich, E. M.,A Guide to Benefit-Cost Analaysis, second edition, Prentice Hall, 1990.

  3. Försäkringsförbundet, Brandstatistik, FSAB, 1990–92.

  4. Hansen, A. T. and Platts, R.E.,The Costs and Benefits of Smoke Alarms in Canadian Houses Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Directorate for Fire and Explosion Prevention, unpublished data, Direktoratet for Brann-og Eksplosjonsvern, Brannstatistikk 1990–1992, Länsförsäkringar, Värmland, unpublished data.

  6. Försäkringsförbundet, Brandstatistik, 1992.

  7. Ruegg, R. T. and Fuller, S. K.,A Benefit-Cost Model of Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems, 1984.

  8. Hansen Consulting Services,Analysis of Costs and Benefits of Installing Fire Sprinklers in Houses, Phase I–II Canada Morgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Norges Forsikringsförbund, Brannarsaksstatistikk, 1988–92.

  10. Direktoratet for Brann-og Eksplosjonsvern: Konsekvensvurdering av Utkast til Forskrift om Brannforebyggende Tiltak og Brannsyn, 1988.

  11. Hall, J. R.,U.S. Experience with Sprinklers, NFPA, 1989.

  12. Appleton, I. C.,A Cost-Benefit Analysis Applied to Foamed Plastics Ceilings, Building Research Establishment Current Paper 50/77, 1977.

  13. Beck, V .R., “Outline of a Stochastic Decision-Making Model for Building Fire Safety and Protection,”Fire Safety Journal, Volume 6, 1983.

  14. Länsförsäkringar, Värmland, unpublished data, Swedish Fire Brigade Data: unpublished, Swedish Rescue Services Board, 1995.

  15. Home Office, Review of Fire Policy, London, 1980.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Juås, B., Mattsson, B. Economics of fire technology. Fire Technol 30, 468–477 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01039945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01039945

Keywords

Navigation