Skip to main content
Log in

A status passage analysis of the defendant's progress through the Magistrates' Court

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

One possible solution to the problem of subjectivity in the interpretation of social phenomena is the application of models derived from formal grounded theory, since such models make explicit the writer's perspective and the assumptions he or she brings to the social situation. This article uses the Status Passage Theory of Glaser and Strauss (1971) to analyze systematically the way in which English Magistrates' Courts deal with defendants. It identifies various features in the courtroom and precourtroom processes and in the attitudes of the courtroom “professionals” that appear consistent with the view that the social degradation of offenders is an implicit, yet important, objective of these courts. Finally, comparisons are made between the lower criminal courts in England and the United States and tentative explanations offered as to why differences exist between social degradation aspects of the two systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, J., & McConville, M.Negotiated justice. London: Martin Robertson, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, D.The criminal court in action. London: Butterworths, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. Problems of inference and proof in participation observation.American Sociological Review, 1953,23, 652–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, S.The faces of justice. London: Collins, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, K., Collinson, P., Turner, S., & Webber, S. National insurance local tribunals.Journal of Social Policy, 1974,3, 289–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B.Class codes and control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A., & McClean, J.Defendants in the criminal process. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, L., Sufria, B., Whetton, J., & White, R.Legal services in Birmingham, Birmingham, England: Institute of Judicial Administration. University of Birmingham, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M.Society and the policeman's role. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. Remedial routines for the maintenance of control in magistrates' courts.British Journal of Law and Society, 1974, 101–117.

  • Carlen, P. Magistrates' courts—A game theory analysis.Sociological Review, 1975, 347–379.

  • Carlen, P. Magistrate's justice. London: Martin Robertson, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Sentence for sale.Criminal Law Review, 1971,150–161; 218–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, S.Silent in court. London: Bell, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, P.Advising sentencers. Oxford, England: Blackwell, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies.American Journal of Sociology, 1956,6, 420–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.A time for dying. Chicago: Aldine, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.Status passage. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., & Lamb, L.Clime prevention conference: Journalism, broadcasting and urban crime. Chichester, England: Barry Rose, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberling, S. Conviction without trial.Anglo-American Law Review, 1973, 439–447.

  • King, M.Bail or custody. London: Cobden Trust, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M.Duty solicitors—An assessment of their impact on a magistrate's court. London: Cobden Trust, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. Roles and relationships in the magistrate's court—A status passage analysis. Warwick University, England: LL.M. Thesis (unpublished).

  • Laurie, P.Scotland yard. London: Bodley Head, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Society, TheGuide to the professional conduct of solicitors. London: The Law Society, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, K. The theory of legal “science”.North Carolina Law Review, 1941,20, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mileski, M. Courtroom encounters: An observation study of a lower criminal court.Law & Society Review, 1971,5, 473–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, H.The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendragon. Rubbish in the crown court—A judicial filter.Law Society Gazette, March, 1975.

  • Perry, S.Information for the courts—A new look at social inquiry reports. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Institute of Criminology, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.The psychology of intelligence (M. Piercy & D. Berlyne, trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purves, R. That plea bargaining business: Some conclusions from research.Criminal Law Review, 1971, 470–475.

  • Rosen, L. The dock—Should it be abolished?Modern Law Review, 1966,29, 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R., & Skolnick, J. A study of social stigma.Social Problems. 1962,10, 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifman, R. The plea bargaining process: Trial by error?New Law Journal. 1977,127, 551–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. Homilies in sentencing.Criminal Law Review, 1971, 690–699.

  • White, S. The presentation in court of social inquiry reports.Criminal Law Review, 1971, 629–637.

  • Zander, M. Unrepresented defendants in the criminal courts.Criminal Law Review, 1969, 632–645.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is an abridged and revised section of the author's LL.M. thesis. Many of the revisions are the result of helpful comments made by Tony Bottoms, Peter Moodie, and Barbara Harrel-Bond on the original thesis.

About this article

Cite this article

King, M. A status passage analysis of the defendant's progress through the Magistrates' Court. Law Hum Behav 2, 183–221 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01039080

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01039080

Keywords

Navigation