Abstract
In this paper we present an overview of a computer program directed toward the remediation of children's deficits in word recognition and phonological decoding. In the present studies, 138 children read stories on the computer, in their school, for a half hour per day during a semester. Children were trained to request synthetic-speech feedback (DECtalk) for difficult words by targeting the words with a mouse. Different groups received whole-word feedback, wherein targeted words were highlighted and spoken as a unit, or segmented feedback, wherein segments of words (onsets, rimes, or syllables) were sequentially highlighted and spoken by the computer, requiring the child to pay attention to and blend the segments. Both whole-word and segmented feedback resulted in almost twice the gains in standardized word recognition scores compared to control groups that spent an equal time in their normal remedial reading program. Most important, the computer-trained groups improved their phonological decoding of nonwords at about four times the rate of the control group. However, there was a significant interaction between level of deficit severity and optimal feedback condition. The most severely disabled readers showed the largest phonological decoding gains from syllable feedback, while the largest gains for the less severely disabled readers were from onset-rime feedback. The disabled readers' level of phonological awareness at pre-test was the strongest predictor for gains in word recognition and phonological decoding. Implications of the results for future training programs are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, A. W., Anderson, H. G., Heilman, P. C., Voeller, K. S. & Torgesen, J. K. (1991). Phonological awareness training and remediation of analytic decoding deficits in a group of severe dyslexics,Annals of Dyslexia 41: 193–206.
Ball, E. W. & Blachman, B. A. (1988). Phoneme segmentation training: Effect on reading readiness,Annals of Dyslexia 38: 208–225.
Barron, R. W., Golden, J. O., Seldon, D. W., Tait, C. F. & Marmurek, H. C. (1990). Training prereading skills with DECtalk: Evidence for a bidirectional causal relationship between phonological awareness and literacy. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association meetings, 16–20 April 1990.
Besner, D., Twilley, L., McCann, R. S. & Seergobin, K., (1990). On the association between connectionism and data: Are a few words necessary?,Psychological Review 97: 432–446.
Boder, E. & Jarrico, S. (1982). The Boder test of reading-spelling patterns: A diagnostic screening test for subtypes of reading disability. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read,Nature 271: 746–747.
Campbell, R. & Butterworth, B. (1985). Phonologocal dyslexia and dysgraphia in a highly literat subject: A developmental case with associated deficits of phonemic processing and awareness,Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37: 435–475.
Conners, F. & Olson, R. K. (1990). Reading comprehension in dyslexic and normal readers: A component skills analysis, pp. 557–579, in: D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d'Arcais & K. Rayner (eds.),Comprehension processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
DeFries, J. C., Olson, R. K., Pennington, B. F. & Smith, S. D. (1991). Colorado reading project: An update, pp. 58–87, in: D. Duane & D. Gray (eds.),The reading brain: The biological basis of dyslexia. Parkton, MD: York Press.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R. & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction,Review of Educational Research 61 (2): 239–264.
Dunn, L. M & Markwardt, F. C. (1970).Examiner's manual: Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Fox, B. & Routh, D. (1980). Phonemic analysis and severe reading disability in children,Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 9: 115–119.
Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game,Journal of the Reading Specialist 6: 126–136.
Jorm, A. F. & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recording and reading acquisition,Applied Psycholinguistics 4: 103–147.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code,Psychological Review 74: 431–461.
Liberman, I. Y. (1983). A language oriented view of reading and its disabilities, in: H. Myklebust (ed.),Progress in learning disabilities, Vol. 5. New York: Grunbe & Stratton.
Lindamood, C. H. & Lindamood, P. C. (1969).Auditory discrimination in depth. Boston, MA: Teaching Resources.
Lindamood, C. H. & Lindamood, P. C. (1979).Lindamood auditory conceptualization test. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources Corporation.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J. & Petersen, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children,Reading Research Quarterly 23: 263–284.
Lyon, G. R. (1985). Educational validation studies, pp. 228–253, in: B. P. Rourke (ed.),Neuropsychology of Learning Disabilities New York: Guslford Publications.
Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V. & Desberg, P. (1981). A cognitive-developmental theory of reading acquisition, in: G. E. MacKinnon and T. G. Waller (eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press.
Olson, R. K. (1985). Disabled reading processes and cognitive profiles, pp. 215–244, in: D. Gray and J. Kavanagh (eds.),Biobehavioral Measures of Dyslexia. Parkton, MD: York Press.
Olson, R., Foltz, G. & Wise, B. (1986). Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech,Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 18: 93–99.
Olson, R. K., Gillis, J. J., Rack, J. P., DeFries, J. C. & Fulker, D. W. (1991). Confirmatory factor analysis of word recognition and process measures in the Colorado Reading Project.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 3: 235–248.
Olson, R. K. & Wise, B. (1987). Computer speech in reading instruction, pp. 156–177, in: D. Reinking (ed.),Computers and reading: Issues for theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Olson, R. K. & Wise, B. (1990). Reading whole text with computer-speech feedback for disabled readers. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association Meetings, 16–20 April 1990, in a symposium titled ‘Using computer-generated speech to teach reading skills: Current research and future directions’.
Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F. & Rack, J. (1990). Organization, heritability, and remediation of component word recognition and language skills in disabled readers, pp. 261–322, in: In T. H. Carr and B. A. Levy (eds.),Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. New York: Academic Press.
Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J. & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences,Journal of Learning Disabilities 22: 339–348.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading Ability. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J. & Olson, R. I. (in press). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: a review,Reading Research Quarterly.
Reitsma, P. (1983). Word-specific knowledge in beginning reading,Journal of Research in Reading 6: 41–56.
Rosner, J. (1971).Phonic analysis training and beginning reading skills. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center (Publication Series).
Rozin, P. & Gleitman, L. R. (1977). The structure and acquisition of reading, II: The reading process and the acquisition of the alphabetic principle, pp. 55–151, in: A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (eds.),Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Seidenberg, M. S. & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming,Psychological Review 96: 523–568.
Spaai, G. W. G., Reitsma, P. & Ellermann, H. H. (1991). Effects of segmented and wholeword sound feedback on learning to read single words,Journal of Educational Research 84: 204–213.
Spoehr, K. T. & Smith, E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processes.Cognitive Psychology 5: 71–89.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity, in: J. K. Torgesen & B. Y. L. Wong (eds.),Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS),Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 21–39.
Treiman, R. (1983). The structure of spoken syllables: Evidence from novel word games,Cognition 15: 49–74.
Wagner, R. & Torgesen, J. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills,Psychological Bulletin 101: 192–212.
Wechsler, D. (1974).Examiner's manual: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
Wise, B. W. (1987). Word segmentation in computerized reading instruction,Dissertation Abstracts (University of Colorado at Boulder).
Wise, B. W. (in press). Whole words versus phonics for short-term learning: Comparisons on a talking computer system.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.
Wise, B. W. & Olson, R. K. (1991). Remediating reading disabilities, pp. 631–658, in: J. E. Obrzut and G. W. Hynd (eds.),Neuropsychological foundations of learning disabilities. New York: Academic Press.
Wise, B. W. & Olson, R. K. (1992). How poor readers and spellers use interactive speech in a computerized spelling program,Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4: 145–163 (this issue).
Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K. & Treiman, R. (1990). Sub-syllabic units as aids in beginning readers' word learning: Onset-rime vs. post-vowel segmentation,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 49: 1–19.
Wise, B. W., OLson, R. K., Anstett, M., Andrews, L., Terjak, M., Schneider, V., Kostuch, J. & Kriho, L. (1989). Implementing a long-term computerized remedial reading program with synthetic speech feedback: Hardware, software, and real world issues,Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 21: 173–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olson, R.K., Wise, B.W. Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback. Read Writ 4, 107–144 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027488
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027488