Skip to main content
Log in

The use of speech feedback by normal and disabled readers in computer-based reading practice

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disabled readers and normal beginning readers were compared on requesting help in the form of speech feedback during computer-based word reading. It was also examined whether it is best to give feedback on all words or to allow the disabled readers to choose. Normal beginning readers and reading-age matched pupils with reading problems engaged in reading practice with speech feedback on call for both difficult and easy words. A set of both difficult and easy sums was completed as a control task. Another group of reading-disabled pupils who were also matched on reading level practiced the reading of words with unsolicited speech feedback. In the first two groups the selectivity in requesting help in both the reading and arithmetic task was assessed. All subjects were tested on the reading of both practiced and nonpracticed words. The results indicate that both disabled readers and beginners were very sensitive to sum difficulty but not to word difficulty, though in the present study the students were more selective than in a previous study. The inclusion of more easy words might account for this finding. The beginners requested help only during the first sessions of reading practice, whereas the disabled readers remained dependent on the speech feedback. The reading-disabled pupils did not learn less when the computer unsolicitedly delivered the spoken form of all words than when they were allowed to choose. It is discussed how profits from the different speech feedback procedures by disabled readers might be related to word decoding skill and metacognitive monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backman, J. E., Mamen, M. & Ferguson, H. B. (1984). Reading level design: Conceptual and methodological issues in reading research,Psychological Bulletin 96: 560–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brus, B. T. & Voeten, M. J. M. (1973).Een-Minuut-Test. Nijmegen (The Netherlands): Berkhout Testmateriaal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm, A. F. & Share, D. L. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition,Applied Psycholinguistics 4: 103–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusters, E. D. M. (1987).Self-corrections in oral reading. Doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F. R. (1985). Acquisition of word identification skills in normal and disabled readers,Journal of Education Psychology 77: 78–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, N. & Norman, D. A. (1979). To ask a question one must know enough to know what is not known,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J. & Wasserman, W. (1974).Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, Å. (1988). Phonemic awareness and the use of computer speech in reading remediation: Theoretical background,Fonetiks 1: 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Foltz, G. & Wise, B. (1986). Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech,Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 18: 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K. & Wise, B. (1987). Computer speech in reading instruction. In: D. Reinking (ed.),Computers and reading: Issues for theory and practice (pp. 156–177). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985).Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, P. (1988). Reading practice for beginners: Effects of guided reading, reading-while-listening, and independent reading with computer-based speech feedback,Reading Research Quarterly 23: 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, P. & Verhoeven, L., eds. (1990).Acquisition of reading in Dutch. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J. (1981). Phonemic deficits in developmental dyslexia,Psychological Research 43: 219–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M., Goulandris, N., Bowlby, M. & Howell, P. (1986). Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: A developmental analysis,Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41: 489–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaai, G. W. G., Reitsma, P. & Ellermann, H. H. (1991). Effects of segmented and whole-word sound feedback on learning to read single words,Journal of Educational Research 84: 204–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency,Reading Research Quarterly 16: 32–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H. L. (1987). Information processing theory and learning disabilities: A commentary and future perspective,Journal of Learning Disabilities 20: 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Daal, V. H. P. & Reitsma, P. (1990). Effects of independent word practice with segmented and whole-word sound feedback in disabled readers,Journal of Research in Reading 13: 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Leij, A. (1987). Special education in the Netherlands. In: C. R. Reynolds & L. Mann (eds.),Encyclopedia of Special Education (pp. 1094–1095). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meij, H. (1987). Factoren die het vragen om assistentie belemmeren [Perceived constraints on help-seeking in school],Pedagogische Studiën 64: 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meij, H. (1988). De behoefte aan hulp en het bieden van hulp [Need of help and providing help],Pedagogische Studiën 65: 358–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wissel, A. (1971).Schiedamse Reken Test, SRT. Groningen (The Netherlands): Wolters-Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, B., Olson, R., Anstett, M., Andrews, L., Terjak, M., Schneider, V., Kostuch, J. & Kriho, L. (1989). Implementing a long-term computerized remedial reading program with synthetic speech feedback: Hardware, software, and real-world issues,Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 21: 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor H. P. Van Daal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Daal, V.H.P., Reitsma, P. The use of speech feedback by normal and disabled readers in computer-based reading practice. Read Writ 5, 243–259 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027390

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027390

Key words

Navigation