Advertisement

Trees

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 117–124 | Cite as

Juvenile/total foliage ratios inEucalyptus nitens and the growth of stands and individual trees

  • C. L. Beadle
  • D. E. McLeod
  • C. R. A. Turnbull
  • D. A. Ratkowsky
  • R. McLeod
Original Articles

Summary

Individual trees and stands of two provenances ofEucalyptus nitens which have marked differences in retention of juvenile foliage were studied in four plantations at different elevations. The proportion of juvenile to total foliage and growth was measured at the end of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th year from establishment. Between the ages of 2 and 4 years annual stem volume increment increased in proportion to the amount of juvenile foliage retained. By age 4 years, stem volume of trees of the juvenile persistent form was significantly larger than that of the early adult form. Increasing differences in height growth with age between provenances, which were highly significant across sites by age 4, contributed to these differences in performance. There was some evidence that the largest trees of the juvenile-persistent form were those which combined mature foliage above juvenile foliage for the longest period during the transition from juvenile to mature foliage. In the early-adult form the largest trees were those which completed the transition to mature foliage rapidly. There was no difference in the ratio of foliage mass to basal area between the two forms. It is suggested that the faster growth of the juvenile-persistent form is related to higher leaf area index and not to foliage type. A provenance ofE. globulus which had a higher retention of juvenile foliage at age 4 than a second provenance had a lower stem volume, thus indicating that in this species early growth rate is not determined by foliage type.

Key words

Canopy structure Growth Heteroblasty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashton DH (1956) Studies on the autecology ofEucalyptus regnons, F. & M. Ph. D. Thesis, University of MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  2. Brack CL, Dawson MP, Gill AM (1985) Bark, leaf and sapwood dimensions inEucalyptus. Aust For Res 15: 1–7Google Scholar
  3. Cameron RJ (1970) Light intensity and the growth ofEucalyptus seedlings. I. Ontogenetic variation inE. fastigata. Aust J Bot 18: 29–43Google Scholar
  4. Donald CM (1968) The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17: 385–403Google Scholar
  5. Edwards PB (1982) Do waxes on juvenileEucalyptus leaves provide protection from grazing insects? Aust J Ecol 7: 347–352Google Scholar
  6. Heather WA (1967) Leaf characteristics ofEucalyptus bicostata Maiden et al. seedlings affecting the deposition and germination of spores ofPhaeoseptoria eucalypti (Hansf.) Walker. Aust J Biol Sci 20: 1155–1160Google Scholar
  7. Jacobs M (1955) Growth habits of eucalypts. Commonwealth of Australia Forestry and Timber BureauGoogle Scholar
  8. McMurtrie RE, Wolf L (1983) Above- and below-ground growth of forest stands: a carbon budget model. Ann Bot 52:437–448Google Scholar
  9. Opie JE (1976) Volume functions for trees of all sizes. For Tech Pap 25: 27–30 (Forests Commission, Victoria)Google Scholar
  10. Pederick LA (1979) Natural variation in shining gum (Eucalyptus nitens). Aust For Res 9: 41–63Google Scholar
  11. Pederick LA (1985) Natural variation in shining gum,Eucalyptus nitens II Second progress report. Dept Consv For Lands Victoria State Forests and Lands Service, Res Branch Rep No 277Google Scholar
  12. Podger FD, Kile GA, Bird T, Turnbull CRA, McLeod DE (1980) An unexplained decline in some forests ofEucalyptus obliqua andEucalyptus regnons in Southern Tasmania. Aust For Res 10: 53–70Google Scholar
  13. Pryor LD, Johnson LAS (1971) A classification of the eucalypts. Australian National University Press, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  14. Purnell RC, Lundquist JE (1986) Provenance variation ofEucalyptus nitens on the Eastern Transvaal Highveld in South Africa. S A For J 138: 23–31Google Scholar
  15. Thomas DA, Barber HN (1974). Studies on leaf characteristics of a cline ofEucalyptus urnigera from Mount Wellington, Tasmania. I. Water repellancy and freezing of leaves. Aust J Bot 22: 501–512Google Scholar
  16. Turnbull CRA, Beadle CL, Bird T, McLeod DE (1988) Volume production in intensively managed eucalypt plantations. Appita J 41: 447–450Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. L. Beadle
    • 1
  • D. E. McLeod
    • 1
  • C. R. A. Turnbull
    • 1
  • D. A. Ratkowsky
    • 1
  • R. McLeod
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIRO Division of Forestry and Forest ProductsHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations