Abstract
The paper presents the results of an empirical study designed to develop a work commitment typology of sales representatives based on the combination of scores for job involvement and organizational commitment. Four types are identified and profiled: the totally involved, the organizational prone, the job prone, and the unattached. A multiple discriminant analysis suggests the sales representative's view of work-related characteristics to be more useful than personal characteristics in predicting work commitment type. Strategies for influencing the predominant types are provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dubinski, A. J., & Hartley, S. W. (1986, Spring). A path-analysis study of a model of salesperson performance.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 14(1), 36–47.
Lodahal, T. M., & Kejner, M. (1965). Job involvement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 29, 24–33.
Morrow, P. C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research—The case of work commitment.Academy of Management Review, 486–500.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. M. (1965). Measurement of organizational commitment,Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 224–246.
Rabinowitz, S., & Hall, D. T. (1977). Organizational research on job involvement.Psychological Bulletin, 54(2), 265–288.
Reagan, C. C. (1985a). The multiple facets of loyalty and devotion of salespersons.Southern Marketing Association Proceedings, 1985, 155–158.
Reagan, C. C. (1985b).Work commitment as a criterion variable in segmentation approach to salesperson turnover management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University.
Stevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1978). Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment.Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), 380–396.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reagan, C.C., Miller, D.I. A work commitment typology of sales representatives in the college textbook industry. J Bus Psychol 3, 459–464 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020713
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020713