Abstract
Electroantennograms (EAGs) were obtained forD. ponderosae to the bark beetle pheromonestrans-verbenol,cis-verbenol,exo-brevicomin,endo-brevicomin, frontalin, verbenone; to the kairomones, α-pinene, β-pinene, camphene, Δ-3-carene, limonene, myrcene; to a blend (1∶1∶1) oftrans-verbenol,exo-brevicomin, and myrcene; and to diacetone-alcohol. Male and female responses, in general, did not differ significantly over the whole EAG dose-response curves but differed at a few concentrations on many of the curves. There were more differences noted for pheromones than kairomones. The blend yielded among the largest EAGs in both sexes and appeared to show synergism. Responses of females were lower than those for males in most instances. Significant differences in responses by the two sexes were much fewer for the kairomones than the pheromones. EAG recovery rates tested at only one concentration showed significant differences between males and females for three pheromones,trans-verbenol,cis-verbenol, and verbenone, and two kairomones, camphene and Δ-3-carene. Thresholds were quite low for most of the odorants exceptcis-verbenol, camphene, verbenone, and diacetone-alcohol in females, andcis-verbenol, verbenone, α-pinene, and diacetone-alcohol in males. The results, using at least one EAG parameter, support behavioral and field studies involvingexo-brevicomin,trans-verbenol, frontalin, and the blend.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angst, M.E., andLanier, G.N. 1979. Electroantennogram responses of two populations ofIps pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to insect-produced and host tree compounds.J. Chem. Ecol. 5:131–140.
Billings, R.F. 1974. Host selection and attack behavior ofDendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in ponderosa pine of eastern Washington. Dissertation, WA: University of Washington, Seattle, 226 pp.
Billings, R.F., Gara, R.I., andHrutfiord, B.F. 1976. Influence of ponderosa pine resin volatiles on the response ofDendroctonus ponderosae to synthetictrans-verbenol.Environ. Entomol. 5:17–179.
Borden, J.H., Conn, J.E., Friskie, L.M., Scott, B.E., Chong, L.J., Pierce, H.D., Jr., andOehlschlager, A.C. 1983a. Semiochemicals for the mountain pine beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in British Columbia: Baited tree studies. Can. J. For. Res. 13:325–333.
Borden, J.H., Chong, L.J., andFuchs, M.C. 1983b. Applications of semiochemicals in post-logging manipulation of the mountain pine beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 76:1428–1432.
Chatelain, M.P., andSchenk, J.A. 1984. Evaluation of frontalin andexo-brevicomin as kairomones to control mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in lodgepole pine.Environ. Entomol. 13:1666–1674.
Cole, W.E., Guymon, E.P., andJensen, C.E. 1981. Monoterpenes of lodgepole pine phloem as related to mountain pine beetles. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. INT-281, 10 pp., Internat. For. and Range Exp. Stn., Ogden, Utah.
Conn, J.E., Borden, J.H., Scott, B.E. Friskie, L.M. Pierce, H.D., Jr., andOehlschlager, A.C. 1983. Semiochemicals for the mountain pine beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in British Columbia: Field trapping studies. Can. J. For. Res. 13:320–324.
Dickens, J. C. 1978. Olfactory perception of pheromone and host-odour enantiomers byIps typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). 4th Int. Insect-Host Plant Symposium.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 24:136–142.
Dickens, J.C. 1981. Behavioural and electrophysiological responses of the bark beetle,Ips typographus, to potential pheromone components.Physiol. Entomol. 6:251–261.
Dickens, J.C., Gutmann, A. Payne, T.L., Ryker, L.C., andRudinsky, J.A. 1983. Antennal olfactory responsiveness of douglas-fir beetle,Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromones and host odors.J. Chem. Ecol. 9:1383–1395.
Dickens, J.C., Payne, T.L. Ryker, L.C., andRudinsky, J.A. 1984. Single cell responses of the Douglas-fir beetle,Dendroctonus pseudotsugae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), to pheromones and host odors.J. Chem. Ecol. 10:583–600.
Grant, A.J., andLanier, G.N. 1982. Electroantennogram responses ofScolytus multistriatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to its pheromone components and to associated compounds.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1333–1344.
Kaissling, K.E. 1974. Sensory transduction in insect olfactory receptors, pp. 243–273,in L. Jaenicke (ed.) Biochemistry of Sensory Functions. Springer, Berlin.
Lyon, R. L. 1958. A useful secondary sex character inDendroctonus bark beetles.Can. Entomol. 90:582–584.
McCambridge, W. F. 1967. Nature of induced attacks by the Black Hills beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 60:920–928.
McKnight, R.C. 1979. Differences in response among populations ofDendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins to its pheromone complex. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, 77 pp.
Merrifield, L.E. 1972. Studies on the host selection behavior of the mountain pine beetle,Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, 54 pp.
Payne, T.L. 1970. Electrophysiological investigations of response to pheromones in bark beetles.Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 24:275–282.
Pitman, G.B. 1971.trans-Verbenol andalpha-pinene: Their utility in manipulation of the mountain pine beetle.J. Econ. Entomol. 64:426–430.
Pitman, G.B., andVité, J.P. 1969. Aggregation behavior ofDendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to chemical messengers.Can. Entomol. 101:143–149.
Pitman, G.B., Vité, J.P., Kinzer, G.W. andFentiman, A.F. 1968. Bark beetle attractants: trans-Verbenol isolated fromDendroctonus.Nature 218:618–619.
Pitman, G.B., Vité, J.P., Kinzer, G.W., andFentiman, A.F. 1969. Specifying of population-aggregating pheromones inDendroctonus.J. Insect Physiol. 15:363–366.
Pitman, G.B., Stock, M.W., andMcKnight, R.C. 1978. Pheromone application in mountain pine beetle-lodgepole pine management: Theory and practice, pp. 165–173,in A.A. Berryman, G.D. Amman, and R.W. Stark, (eds). Theory and Practice of Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Lodgepole Pine Forests: Proceedings of a Symposium; April 25–27, 1978, Forest, Wildlife ande Range Experiment Station, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.
Roelofs, W.L. 1977. The scope and limitations of the electroantennogram technique in identifying pheromone components, pp. 147–165,in N.R. McFarlane (ed.) Crop Protection Agents— Their Biological Evaluation. Academic Press, New York.
Roelofs, W.L., andComeau, A. 1971. Sex pheromone perception: Electroantennogram responses of the red-banded leaf roller moth.J. Insect. Physiol. 17:1969–1982.
Rudinsky, J.A., Morgan, M.E. Libbey, L.M., andPutman, T.B. 1974. Antiaggregative-rivalry pheromone of the mountain pine beetle, and a new arrestant of the southern pine beetle.Environ. Entomol. 3:90–98.
Ryker, L.C., andLibbey, L.M. 1982. Frontalin in the male mountain pine beetle.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:1399–1409.
Ryker, L.C., andRudinsky, J.A. 1982. Field bioassay ofexo- and endo-brevicomin withDendroctonus ponderosae in lodgepole pine.J. Chem. Ecol. 8:701–707.
Silverstein, R.M. 1984. Chemistry of insect communication, pp. 105–121,in T. Lewis (ed). Insect Communication. Academic Press, London.
Smith, R.H. 1964. The monoterpenes of lodgepole pine oleoresin.Phytochemistry 3:259–262.
Vité, J.P., andGara, R.I. 1962. Volatile attractants from ponderosa pine attacked by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21:253–273.
Wadhams, L. 1982. Coupled gas chromatograpy-single cell recording: A new technique for use in the analysis of insect pheromones. Z.Naturforsch., C. Biosci. 37C:947–952.
Yamasaki, T., andNarahashi, T. 1959. The effects of potassium and sodium ions in the resting and action potentials of the cockroach giant axon.J. Insect Physiol. 3:146–158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitehead, A.T. Electroantennogram responses by mountain pine beetles,Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, exposed to selected semiochemicals. J Chem Ecol 12, 1603–1621 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020267
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01020267