Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rapid and sensitive detection of oestrogen receptors in cells and tissue sections by autoradiography with125I-oestradiol

  • Papers
  • Published:
The Histochemical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The presence of receptors for steroid hormones in individual cells and tissue sections was assessed within 4–24 h using dry mount autoradiography with radio-iodinated oestradiol. Low affinity and nonspecific binding of steroids were significantly reduced by washing the cells or sections with diluted antiserum to oestradiol.

For cells of the MCF-7 cell line variations in grain density were observed, indicating that cells of the MCF-7 cell line are heterogenous with respect to their cellular receptor concentrations of oestrogen receptors. Receptor-negative cells, such as peritoneal macrophages, did not retain oestradiol label.

In tissue sections of rat and calf uterus, predominant labelling was observed on the endometrial gland cells and stroma.

Oestradiol receptor binding in the uterus cytosol for both radio-iodinated and tritiated oestradiol showed the same qualitative characteristics as determined by sucrose gradient sedimentation profiles and a comparable amount of binding sites was found for both labels. The relative binding affinity of125I-oestradiol compared to [3H]oestradiol is about 70–80%.

The dry mount autoradiographic technique as presented can be used for rapid screening of heterogeneiety in oestrogen receptor distribution in cells and tissue sections, since this technique reveals differences in receptor concentrations on the single cell level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berns, E. m. j. l., Mulder, E., Rommerts, F. f. g., Van der Molen, H. j., Blankenstein, M. a., Boltde vries, J. &De Goeij, T. f. p. m. (1984a) Fluorescent androgen derivatives do not discriminate between androgen receptor-positive and-negative human tumor cell lines.The Prostate 5, 425–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berns, E. m. j. j., Mulder, E., Rommerts, F. f. g., Blankenstein, M. a., De Graaf, E. &Van der Molen, H. j. (1984b) Fluorescent ligands, used in histocytochemistry, do not discriminate between estrogen receptor-positive and receptor-negative human tumor cell lines.Breast Cancer Res. Treatment 4, 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, R. h. &Tremblay, G. (1981) Autoradiographic demonstration of uptake and retention of3H-estradiol afterin vitro incubation.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 29, 1316–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamness, G. c. &Mcguire, W. l. (1982) Questions about histochemical methods for steroid receptors.Archs Path. Lab. Med. 106, 53–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamness, G. c., Mercer, W. d. &Mcguire, W. l. (1980) Are histochemical tests for estrogen receptors valid?J. Histochem. Cytochem. 28, 792–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, G. l. &Jensen, E. v. (1982) Monoclonal antibodies as probes for estrogen receptor detection and characterization.J. Steroid Biochem. 16, 353–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grill, H. i., Manz, B., Belovsky, O., Krauzelitzki, B. &Polow, K. (1983) Comparison of [3H]-estradiol and [125I]-estradiol as ligands for estrogen receptor determination.J. clin. Chem. clin. Biochem. 21, 175–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, R. b. (1979) Iodine-125-labelled estradiol: a gamma-emitting analog of estradiol that binds to the estrogen receptor.Science 205, 1138–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, R. b. &Rosner, W. (1980) Interaction of 16-[125I]iodo-estradiol with estrogen receptor and other steroid binding proteins.Proc. natn. Acad. USA 77, 328–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W. j. &Greene, G. l. (1984) Monoclonal antibodies localize estrogen receptors in the nuclei of target cells.Nature, Lond. 307, 745–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. h. (1981) The histochemistry of estrogen receptors.Histochemistry 71, 491–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. m., Magdelenat, H. p., Benyahia, B., Rigaud, O. &Katzenellenbogen, J. a. (1983) New approach for visualizing estrogen receptors in target cells using inherently fluorescent ligands and image intensification.Cancer Res. 43, 4956–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccarty, U. s., Jr., Woorlard, B. h., Nicols, D. e., Wilkinson, W. &Mccarty, K. s. Sr. (1980) Comparison of biochemical and histochemical techniques for estrogen receptor analyses in mammary carcinoma.Cancer 46, 2842–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcguire, W. l. (1980) Steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer treatment strategy.Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 36, 135–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henci, I., Dandliker, W. b., Meyers, C y., Marchetti, E., Marzola, A. &Fabris, G. (1980) Estrogen receptor cytochemistry by fluorescent estrogen.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 28, 1081–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henci, I., Piffanelli, A., Beccati, M. d. &Lanza, G. (1976)In vivo andin vitro immunofluorescent approach to the physiopathology of estradiol kinetics in target cells.J. Steroid Biochem. 7, 883–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perischuk, L. p., Tobin, E. h., Tanapat, P., Gaetjens, E., Carter, A. c., Bloom, N. d., Macchia, R. i. &Eisenberg, K. b. (1980) Histochemical analyses of steroid hormone receptors in breast and prostate carcinoma.Histochem. Cytochem. 28, 799–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieslor, P. c., Gibson, R. e., Eckelman, W. c., Oates, K. k., Cook, B. &Reba, R. c. (1982) Three radioligands for determining cytoplasmic estrogen receptor content of human breast carcinomas.Clin. Chem. 28, 532–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, M. f. &Greene, G. l. (1984) Method in laboratory in vestigations. An immunocytochemical method for demonstrating estrogen receptor in human uterus using monoclonal antibodies to human estrophilin.Lab. Invest. 50, 480–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, W. e. (1968) Subcellular distribution of3H-estradiol in rat uterus by quantitative autoradiography—A comparison between3H-estradiol and3H-norethynodrel.Endocrinology 83, 777–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • stumpf, w. e. &sar, m. (1975) Autoradiographic techniques for localizing steroid hormones. InMethods in Enzymology, Vol. 36A (edited byo'malley, b. w. andhardman, j. g.), pp. 135–56.

  • stumpf, w. e. &sar, m. (1976) Autoradiographic localization of estrogen, androgen, progestin and glucocorticosteroid in ‘target tissues’ and ‘non-target tissues’. InReceptors and Mechanism of Action of Steroid Hormones, Part I (edited bypasqualini, j. r.), pp. 41–84.

  • Tercero, J. c., Nelson, J. c. &Broughton, A. (1981) 16α-[125I]-β-estradiol compared with [3H]-β-estradiol as the tracer in estradiol receptor assays.Clin. Chem. 27, 1913–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry II, (Division of Chemical Endocrinology), Medical Faculty, Erasmus, University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Els M. J. J. Berns, Focko F. G. Rommerts & Eppo Mulder

Authors
  1. Els M. J. J. Berns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Focko F. G. Rommerts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eppo Mulder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berns, E.M.J.J., Rommerts, F.F.G. & Mulder, E. Rapid and sensitive detection of oestrogen receptors in cells and tissue sections by autoradiography with125I-oestradiol. Histochem J 17, 1185–1196 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01002501

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01002501

Keywords

Search

Navigation