Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 206–229 | Cite as

The midterm referendum: The importance of attributions of responsibility

  • John R. Petrocik
  • Frederick T. Steeper
Article

Abstract

Analysts and commentators have long regarded midterm congressional elections as an interim evaluation of the president. Recent research has emphasized the effect of the individual qualities of congressional candidates on the vote. Both factors contributed to the 1982 congressional vote. However, the relative success of the Republican party in 1982 was made possible by the unwillingness of a majority of the electorate to attribute the country's economic problems to the administration. This attribution factor, implicitly ignored in most analyses of the effect of the economy on vote choices, is examined here.

Keywords

Economic Problem Individual Quality Relative Success Vote Choice Republican Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achen, Christopher (1979). The bias in normal vote estimates.Political Methodology 6(May): 343–356.Google Scholar
  2. Arcelus, Francisco, and Metzer, Allan H. (1975). The effect of aggregate economic variables on congressional elections.APSR 69(Dec.): 1232–1239. (Read the comments and rejoinders.)Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, H., and Price, H. (1975). Voter response to shortrun economic conditions: the asymmetric effect of prosperity and recession.APSR 69(December): 1240–1254.Google Scholar
  4. Burnham, Walter Dean (1975a). American politics in the 1970s: beyond party? In William Nisbet Chambers and Walter Dean Burnham (eds.),The American Party Systems: Stages of Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burnham, Walter Dean (1975b). Insularity and responsiveness in congressional elections.Political Science Quarterly 90(Fall): 411–435.Google Scholar
  6. Calvert, Randall L., and Ferejohn, John A. (1983). Coattail voting in recent presidential elections.APSR 77(June): 407–419.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, Argus (1966). Surge and decline: a study of electoral change. In A. Campbell et al. (eds.),Elections and the Political Order, pp. 40–62. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Converse, Philip E. (1966). The concept of a normal vote. In A. Campbell et al. (eds.),Elections and the Political Order, pp. 9–39. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Erikson, Robert (1971). The advantage of incumbency in congressional elections.Polity (Spring): 395–405.Google Scholar
  10. Feldman, Stanley (1982). Economic self-interest and political behavior.AJPS 26(August): 446–466.Google Scholar
  11. Fiorina, Morris P. (1977). The case of the vanishing marginals: the bureaucracy did it.APSR 71(March): 177–181.Google Scholar
  12. Fiorina, Morris P. (1981).Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gurin, Patricia, and Epps, Edgar G. (1975).Black Consciousness, Identity, and Achievement. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality.Psychological Review 51: 358–374.Google Scholar
  15. Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel (1981).Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kernell, Samuel (1977). “Presidential popularity and negative voting.”APSR 71(March): 44–66.Google Scholar
  18. Kiewiet, D. Roderick (1982).Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kramer, Gerald (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964.APSR 65(March): 131–143.Google Scholar
  20. Kramer, Gerald (1983). The ecological fallacy revisited: aggregate vs. individual findings on economics and elections and sociotropic voting.APSR 77(March): 92–111.Google Scholar
  21. Mann, Thomas E., and Wolfinger, Raymond E. (1980). Candidates and parties in congressional elections.APSR 74(September): 617–632.Google Scholar
  22. Mayhew, David R. (1974). Congressional elections: the cases of the vanishing marginals.Polity 6(Spring): 295–317.Google Scholar
  23. Moser, Charles A. (1981). Watershed and ratifying elections: a historical view of the 1934 and 1954 midterm congressional elections. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  24. Mueller, John (1970). “Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson.”APSR 64(March): 18–34.Google Scholar
  25. Mueller, John (1973).War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Norpoth, Melmut, and Yartek, Thom (1983). Macroeconomic conditions and fluctuations of presidential popularity: the question of lagged effects.AJPS 27(November): 785–807.Google Scholar
  27. Petrocik, John R. (1981). Voter turnout and electoral oscillation.American Politics Quarterly 9(April): 161–180.Google Scholar
  28. Tufte, Edward (1975). Determinants of the outcome of midterm congressional elections.APSR 69(September): 812–826.Google Scholar
  29. Witt, Evans (1983). A model election?Public Opinion 5(December/January): 46–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Agathon Press, Inc. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • John R. Petrocik
    • 1
  • Frederick T. Steeper
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaLos Angeles
  2. 2.Market Opinion ResearchUSA

Personalised recommendations