Skip to main content
Log in

The midterm referendum: The importance of attributions of responsibility

  • Published:
Political Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analysts and commentators have long regarded midterm congressional elections as an interim evaluation of the president. Recent research has emphasized the effect of the individual qualities of congressional candidates on the vote. Both factors contributed to the 1982 congressional vote. However, the relative success of the Republican party in 1982 was made possible by the unwillingness of a majority of the electorate to attribute the country's economic problems to the administration. This attribution factor, implicitly ignored in most analyses of the effect of the economy on vote choices, is examined here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achen, Christopher (1979). The bias in normal vote estimates.Political Methodology 6(May): 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcelus, Francisco, and Metzer, Allan H. (1975). The effect of aggregate economic variables on congressional elections.APSR 69(Dec.): 1232–1239. (Read the comments and rejoinders.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H., and Price, H. (1975). Voter response to shortrun economic conditions: the asymmetric effect of prosperity and recession.APSR 69(December): 1240–1254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, Walter Dean (1975a). American politics in the 1970s: beyond party? In William Nisbet Chambers and Walter Dean Burnham (eds.),The American Party Systems: Stages of Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, Walter Dean (1975b). Insularity and responsiveness in congressional elections.Political Science Quarterly 90(Fall): 411–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, Randall L., and Ferejohn, John A. (1983). Coattail voting in recent presidential elections.APSR 77(June): 407–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Argus (1966). Surge and decline: a study of electoral change. In A. Campbell et al. (eds.),Elections and the Political Order, pp. 40–62. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. (1966). The concept of a normal vote. In A. Campbell et al. (eds.),Elections and the Political Order, pp. 9–39. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, Robert (1971). The advantage of incumbency in congressional elections.Polity (Spring): 395–405.

  • Feldman, Stanley (1982). Economic self-interest and political behavior.AJPS 26(August): 446–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris P. (1977). The case of the vanishing marginals: the bureaucracy did it.APSR 71(March): 177–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, Morris P. (1981).Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, Patricia, and Epps, Edgar G. (1975).Black Consciousness, Identity, and Achievement. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality.Psychological Review 51: 358–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel (1981).Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernell, Samuel (1977). “Presidential popularity and negative voting.”APSR 71(March): 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, D. Roderick (1982).Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, Gerald (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896–1964.APSR 65(March): 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, Gerald (1983). The ecological fallacy revisited: aggregate vs. individual findings on economics and elections and sociotropic voting.APSR 77(March): 92–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Thomas E., and Wolfinger, Raymond E. (1980). Candidates and parties in congressional elections.APSR 74(September): 617–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, David R. (1974). Congressional elections: the cases of the vanishing marginals.Polity 6(Spring): 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, Charles A. (1981). Watershed and ratifying elections: a historical view of the 1934 and 1954 midterm congressional elections. Unpublished paper.

  • Mueller, John (1970). “Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson.”APSR 64(March): 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, John (1973).War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norpoth, Melmut, and Yartek, Thom (1983). Macroeconomic conditions and fluctuations of presidential popularity: the question of lagged effects.AJPS 27(November): 785–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrocik, John R. (1981). Voter turnout and electoral oscillation.American Politics Quarterly 9(April): 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, Edward (1975). Determinants of the outcome of midterm congressional elections.APSR 69(September): 812–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, Evans (1983). A model election?Public Opinion 5(December/January): 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petrocik, J.R., Steeper, F.T. The midterm referendum: The importance of attributions of responsibility. Polit Behav 8, 206–229 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01002098

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01002098

Keywords

Navigation