Skip to main content
Log in

Taxon-specific differences in responsiveness to capsaicin and several analogues: Correlates between chemical structure and behavioral aversiveness

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present set of experiments was designed to explore avian insensitivity to capsaicin. Based upon a molecular model of avian chemosensory repellency, we hypothesized that structural modifications of the basic capsaicin molecule, which is itself not aversive to birds, might produce aversive analogues. To this end, European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) were given varied concentrations of synthetic capsaicin and four analogues (methyl capsaicin, veratryl amine, veratryl acetamide, vanillyl acetamide) in feeding and drinking tests. The results agreed with a model that we are developing to describe the chemical nature of avian repellents. Synthetic capsaicin and vanillyl acetamide were not repellent to birds, owing to the presence of an acidic phenolic OH group. Conversely, veratryl acetamide was aversive, due to the basic nature of this compound. For rats, repellent effectiveness among compounds was reversed: synthetic capsaicin was the best repellent while veratryl acetamide was the worst. We speculate that this taxonomic reversal may reflect basic differences in trigeminal chemoreception. In any case, it is clear that chemical correlates of mammalian repellents are opposite to those that predict avian repellency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Clark, L., andMason, J.R. 1987. Olfactory discrimination of plant volatiles by the European starling.Anim. Behav. 35:227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., andShah, P.S. 1991. Resonance and basicity as predictors of avian repellency and irritation.J. Wildl. Manage. 55:539–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L.,Shah, P.S., andMason, J.R. 1991. Chemical repellency in birds. Relationship between structure of anthranilate and benzoic acid derivatives and avoidance response.J. Expl. Zool. In press.

  • Dubbeldam, J.L., andVeenman, C.L. 1978. Studies on the somatotopy of the trigeminal system in the mallard,Anas platyrhyncous L.: The Ganglion Trigeminale.Netherlands J. Zool. 28:150–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, B.G., Mason, J.R., andKare, M.R. 1990. Chemical Senses, Vol. II: Irritation. Marcel-Dekker, New York. 361 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, E.K. 1919. Vanillyl acyl-amides.J. Amr. Chem. Soc. 41:2121–2123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubas, W.J.,Mason, J.R.,Clark, L.,Shah, P.S., andNorman, D. 1991. Avian feeding deterrence as mediated by coniferyl benzoate: A structure-activity approach.Ecol. Appl. In press.

  • Kare, M.R., andMason, J.R. 1986. The chemical senses in birds, pp. 59–74,in P.D. Sturkie (ed.). Avian Physiology. Springer-Verlag, New York. 516 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.R., andClark, L. 1990. Evaluation of Blockout (Northwest Chemicals, Inc.) and Its Chemical Components as Avian Contact Repellents. Denver Wildlife Research Center Bird Section Research Report 457. 10 pp.

  • Mason, J.R., andMaruniak, J.A. 1983. Behavioral and physiological effects of capsaicin in redwinged blackbirds.Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 19:857–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.R., andOtis, D.L. 1990. Chemical nociception in birds, pp. 309–322,in B. Green, J.R. Mason, and M.R. Kare (eds.). Chemical Senses, Vol. II: Irritation. Marcel Dekker, New York. 361 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.R., andReidinger, R.F. 1983. Exploitable characteristics of neophobia and food aversions for improvements in rodent and bird control, pp. 20–42,in D.E. Kaukienen (ed.). Vertebrate Pest Control and Management Materials: Fourth Symposium. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 315 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.R., andSilver, W.L. 1983. Trigeminally mediated odor aversions in starlings.Brain Res. 269:196–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.R., Adams, M.A., andClark, L. 1989. Anthranilate repellent to starlings: Chemical correlates and sensory perception.J. Wildl. Manage. 53:55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.R., Clark, L., andShah, P.S. 1991. Ortho-aminoacetophenone repellency to birds: Similarities to methyl anthranilate.J. Wildl. Manage. 55:334–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.H. 1912. The reactions of smell, taste, and the common chemical sense in vertebrates.J. Acad. Natl. Sci. Phila. 15:221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, A.L., andClarke, C.M. 1977. Conditioned taste aversions: A bibliography, pp. 593–632,in L.M. Barker, M.R. Best, and M. Domjan (eds.). Learning Mechanisms in Food Selection. Baylor University Press, Waco, Texas 632 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P.S., Clark, L., andMason, J.R. 1991. Prediction of avian repellency from chemical structure: The aversiveness of vanillin, vanillyl alcohol and veratryl alcohol.Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 40:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soudek, J. 1929. The sense of smell in birds.Proc. Intl. Congr. Zool. 1929:755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szolcsanyi, J., Sann, H., andPierau, 1986. Nociception in pigeons is not impaired by capsaicin.Pain 27:247–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J.C., Tucker, D., andSmith, J.C. 1979. Odor sensitivity mediated by the trigeminal nerve in the pigeon.Chem. Senses Flav. 4:107–116.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason, J.R., Bean, N.J., Shah, P.S. et al. Taxon-specific differences in responsiveness to capsaicin and several analogues: Correlates between chemical structure and behavioral aversiveness. J Chem Ecol 17, 2539–2551 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994601

Key words

Navigation