Skip to main content
Log in

Buyer-supplier relational characteristics and joint decision making

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores propositions dealing with the influence of buyer-supplier relational characteristics on their joint decision making. Specifically, the proposed conceptual framework focuses on the link between three relational constructs (trust, commitment, relationship maturity) and two types of joint decision making (strategic and tactical). Strategic decisions are those that “expand the pie” for both parties (integrative decisions), and tactical decisions are those that “divide the pie” between the two parties (distributive decisions). We propose that the effect of relational characteristics on joint decision making is likely to be moderated by the characteristics of the supplier organization (such as team orientation) and its environment (such as competitive intensity). We conclude with a brief discussion of the implications and possible extensions of the theoretical model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achrol, Ravi Singh, Torger Reve, and Louis Stern. (1983). “The Environment of Marketing Channel Dyads: A Framework for Comparative Analysis,”Journal of Marketing 47 (Fall), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achrol, Ravi Singh, and Louis Stern. (1988). “Environmental Determinants of Decision-Making Uncertainty in Marketing Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February), 36–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Erin, and Barton Weitz. (1989). “Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads,”Marketing Science 8 (Fall), 310–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1992). “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels,”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (February), 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James, and James Narus. (1986). “Toward a Better Understanding in Distribution Channel Working Relationships.” In K. Backhaus and D. Wilson (eds.),Industrial Marketing: A German-American Perspective (pp. 320–336). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1990). “A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships,”Journal of Marketing 54 (January), 42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul Schurr, and Sejo Oh. (1987). “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships,”Journal of Marketing 51 (April), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert, and Orville Walker. (1981). “Bargaining in an Asymmetrical Power Structure,”Journal of Marketing 45 (Winter), 104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filley, John, Robert House, and Steve Kerr. (1986).Managerial Process and Organizational Behavior. New York: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Gary L. (1983). “Interorganizational Exchange Behavior in Marketing Channels: A Broadened Perspective,”Journal of Marketing 47 (Fall), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Gary L., and Raymond Rody. (1991). “The Use of Influence Strategies in Interfirm Relationships in Industrial Product Channels,”Journal of Marketing 55 (January), 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, Gary L., and John Summers. (1984). “Interfirm Influence Strategies and Their Application Within Distribution Channels,”Journal of Marketing 48 (Summer), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, Shankar. (1993). “Negotiation Strategies and the Nature of Channel Relationships,”Journal of Marketing Research 38 (May), 183–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaski, John. (1984). “The Theory of Power and Conflict in Channels of Distribution,”Journal of Marketing 48 (Summer), 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1986). “Interactions Among a Channel Entity's Power Sources: Impact of the Exercise of Reward and Coercion on Expert, Referent and Legitimate Power Sources,”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (February), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, George. (1984). “An Empirical Investigation of Some Antecedents of Opportunism in a Marketing Channel,”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (August), 278–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Saul, Gary L. Frazier, and Victor J. Roth. (1990). “A Transaction Cost Analysis Model of Channel Integration in International Markets,”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (May), 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Richard O., and Ian I. Mitroff. (1981).Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory, Cases, and Techniques. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, Jakki, and John Nevin. (1990). “Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective,”Journal of Marketing 54 (October), 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Larry, and Louis Stern. (1971). “Conflict Measurement in the Distribution Channel,”Journal of Marketing Research 8 (November), 437–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger, David M., William R. Sandberg, and Paula L. Rechner. (1989). “Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making,”Academy of Management Journal 32(4), 745–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniezek, Janet A. (1992). “Groups Under Uncertainty: An Examination of Confidence in Group Decision Making,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52(1), 124–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Louis, and Jay Brown. (1969). “Distribution Channels: A Social Systems Approach.” In Louis Stern (ed.),Distribution Channels: Behavioral Dimensions (pp. 156–175). New York: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Jeremiah, and Richard B. Peterson. (1982). “Factors Associated with Trust in Japanese-American Joint Ventures,”Management International Review 22, 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Orville C., Jr. (1971). “The Effects of Learning on Bargaining Behaviors.” In Fred C. Alvine (ed.).1971 Combined Proceedings (pp. 194–199). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, Barton A. (1981). “Effectiveness in Sales Interactions: A Contingency Framework,”Journal of Marketing 45 (Winter), 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors thank Peter Dickson, Joe Urbany, Rajan Varadarajan, and the editor, Don Lehmann, for their comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frazier, G.L., Jaworski, B.J., Kohli, A.K. et al. Buyer-supplier relational characteristics and joint decision making. Marketing Letters 5, 259–270 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993905

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993905

Key words

Navigation