Skip to main content
Log in

Action nominalizations and the lexicalist hypothesis

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides an account of the mixed verbo-nominal properties of the action nominalization construction in Hebrew and Arabic. Such an account is achieved by postulating an underlying representation in which a VP is the complement of an abstract nominal head, a nominalizer, and a derivation in which the verb is adjoined to the nominalizing morpheme to derive the action nominal that is the head of the construction. A central assumption of this analysis concerns the thematic properties, the argument structure, of the nominalizer and the way these interact with the overall thematic structure of action nominalizations. Finally, the article discusses the issue of lexicalism and develops arguments in favor of the non-lexicalist approach to action nominalizations developed in this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abney, Steven: 1986, ‘Functional Elements and Licensing’, unpublished ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abney, Steven: 1987,The English Noun-Phrase in its Sentential Aspect, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark: 1988,Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, The University of Chicago Press.

  • Berman, Ruth: 1978,Modern Hebrew Structure, Tel-Aviv, University Publishing Projects.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit: 1984,Parametric Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit: 1988, ‘On the Morphological Parallelism Between Compounds and Constructs’, in G. Booij and Van Marle (eds.),Yearbook of Morphology, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, Hagit: to appear, ‘Derived Nominals and the Causative-Inchoative Alternation: Two Case Studies in Parallel Morphology’, unpublished ms., UC, Irvine.

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1982,Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam: 1986,Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, Mark: 1964,A Reference Grammar of Syrian Arabic, Georgetown University Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di-Sciullo, A. M. and Williams, Edwin: 1987,On the Definition of Word, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doron, Edit: 1989, ‘Derived Nominals in Hebrew’, unpublished ms., Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

  • Fassi-Fehri, A-K.: 1982,Linguistic Arabe: Forme et Interpretation, Publications de la faculté des lettres et sciences humaines, Rabat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassi-Fehri, A-K.: 1988, ‘Generalized IP Structure, Case and VS Word Order’,MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11.

  • Glinert, Luis: 1989,The Grammar of Modern Hebrew, Cambridge University Press.

  • Grimshaw, Jane: 1990,Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazout, Ilan: 1990,Verbal Nouns: Theta Theoretic Studies in Hebrew and Arabic, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Masschusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazout, Ilan: 1992, ‘The Verbal Gerund in Modern Hebrew’,NLLT 10, pp. 523–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazout, Ilan: to appear, ‘Nominalizers in Theta Theory’,The Linguistic Review.

  • Horn, George: 1975, ‘On the Nonsentential Nature of the Poss-ING Construction’,Linguistic Analysis 1.

  • Hoyt, Katherine: 1989, ‘Verb Raising in Lebanese Arabic’,MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11.

  • Jackendoff, Ray: 1977,X′-Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, David: 1988,Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsark, G. L.: 1988, ‘Single-ING’,Linguistic Inquiry 19.

  • Mushaweh, Lubana: 1986,De la Syntaxe des Petites Propositions, These de Doctorat, Université de Paris VIII.

  • Ouhalla, Jamal: 1988,The Syntax of Head Movement: A Study of Berber, Ph.D. Dissertation, University College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Elisabeth: 1986, ‘NSO Noun Phrases in Modern Hebrew’, J. McDonough and B. Plunkett (eds.),Proceedings of NELS 17.

  • Ritter, Elisabeth: 1990, ‘Two Functional Categories in Noun Phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew’, unpublished ms., UQAM.

  • Riemsdijk, Henk van and Williams, Edwin: 1981, ‘NP-Structure’,The Linguistic Review 1.

  • Schachter, Paul: 1976, ‘A Nontransformational Account of Gerundive Nominals in English’,Linguistic Inquiry 7.

  • Schachter, Paul: 1985, ‘Parts of Speech’, in T. Shopen (ed.),Language Typology and Syntactic Description 1, Cambridge University Press.

  • Siloni, Tali: 1990, ‘Hebrew Noun Phrases: Generalized Noun Raising’, unpublished ms., Université de Genève.

  • Travis, Lisa: 1984,Parameters and Effects of Word-Order Variation, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1981, ‘Argument Structure and Morphology’,The Linguistic Review 1.

  • Williams, Edwin: 1982, ‘The NP Cycle’,Linguistic Inquiry 13.

  • Williams, Edwin: 1987a, ‘Implicit Argument, Binding Theory and Control’,NLLT 5.

  • Williams, Edwin: 1987b, ‘NP Trace in Theta Theory’,Linguistics and Philosophy 10.

  • Williams, Edwin: 1989, ‘The Anaphoric Nature of Theta Roles’,Linguistic Inquiry 20.

  • Wright, W.: 1988,A Grammar of the Arabic Language, Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am greatly indebted to Edwin Williams and Roger Higgins for discussions of and comments on the material presented in this paper. The comments of an NLLT reviewer led to improvements in the organization of this material. H. Borer's editorial comments were helpful in preparing the final version.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hazout, I. Action nominalizations and the lexicalist hypothesis. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 13, 355–404 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992736

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992736

Keywords

Navigation