Abstract
This paper investigates the problem of corruption in India from a social constructionist perspective. The constructions of corruption among five elite groups (bureaucrats, judges, politicians, industrialists, and journalists) in the southern state of Andhra Pradesh were obtained through a total of 60 interviews. Members of these five elite groups play a critical role in constructing the problem of corruption for public discourse. These elite groups, with the possible exception of the media elite, are also primary targets of public accusations of corrupt behavior. This paper examines three major issues related to corruption: the definition of corruption, the so-called functionality of corruption, and the role of culture in fostering or inhibiting corruption. Narrow/legalistic or broad/moralistic definitions of corruption, the acceptance or rejection of functionality, and modernist or nationalist responses to the question of culture are shown to constitute the varied structures of reality constructed by the different elite groups. These constructions of the corrupt reality in India are explained with reference to specific interests of the elites and their positions in the social structure. Instead of treating corruption as an objective condition, this study seeks to view corruption as a process in which strategic elites in society, define the problem and negotiate solutions to it.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alam, S. M. (1989). “Anatomy of Corruption: an approach to the political economy of underdevelopment,”American Journal of Economics and Sociology 48, 4, October, 441–456.
Bayley, D. H. (1966). “The Effects of Corruption in a Developing Nation,”Western Political Quarterly XIX, 719–732.
Ben-Dor, G. (1974). “Corruption, Institutionalization, and Political Development: the revisionist theses revisited,”Comparative Political Studies 7, April, 63–83.
Ben-Yehuda, N. (1990).The Politics and Morality of Deviance: Moral Panics, Drug Abuse, Deviant Science, and Reversed Stigmatization Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
Berger, P., and Luckmann, T. (1967).The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge New York: Doubleday.
Chatterjee, P. (1986).Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse? London: Zed Books.
Chibnall, S., and Saunders, P. (1977). “World Apart: Notes on the social reality of corruption,”British Journal of Sociology 28, June, 138–154.
Gusfield, J. R. (1981).The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heidenheimer, A. J.,et al. (eds) (1989).Political Corruption: A Handbook New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.
Huntington, S. (1968).Political Order in Changing Societies New Haven: Yale University Press.
Inden, R. (1990).Imagining India Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell.
Jain, R. B. (1983). “Fighting Political Corruption: the Indian Experience,”The Indian Political Science Review XVII, 2, July, 215–228.
Kohli, S. (1975).Corruption in India New Delhi: Chetana Publications.
Lerner, D. (1955).The Passing of a Traditional Society New York: Free Press.
Levine, V. T. (1975).Political Corruption: The Ghana Case Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
Neher, C. D. (1977). “Political Corruption in a Thai Province,”Journal of Developing Areas 11, July, 479–492.
Nye, J. S. (1967). “Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis,”American Political Science Review 61, June, 417.
Padhy, K. S. (1986).Corruption in Politics: A Case Study Delhi: B. R. Publishing Corporation.
Scott, J. C. (1972).Comparative Political Corruption Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Scott, J. C. (1985).Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance New Haven: Yale University Press.
Smith, T. M. (1971). “Corruption, Tradition, and Change,”Indonesia 11, 21–40.
Tilman, R. O. (1968). “Emergence of Black-Market Bureaucracy: Administration, Development, and Corruption in the New States,”Public Administration Review XXVIII, 5, Sept/Oct, 437–444.
Wilson, R. W. (1991). “Political Pathology and Moral Orientations,”Comparative Political Studies 24, 2, July, 211–230.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pavarala, V. Corruption as a site for contested meaning: Elite constructions in India. Qual Sociol 16, 405–422 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989972
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989972