Abstract
This participant observation study examines some of the definitional and dramaturgical work performed by basketball officials attempting to enforce formal rules in the presence of audiences (e.g., spectators, coaches, players and fellow officials). Our analysis begins with the discovery that officiating requires participation in both a real world of physical events and objects, and a social world of subjective identifications. Second, we explore the contexts of legitimation by which decisions are justified. Third, we identify dramaturgical strategies used by officials to enhance legitimacy in the face of problematic decisions. Finally, we consider the assumptions officials make about the character of their work. The paper concludes with a discussion of indexical and interpretive features of organizational and bureaucratic use of formal rules, including the case of basketball officiating.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blau, Peter 1955 The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua 1954 “Indexical expressions.” Mind 63:359–379.
Bittner, Egon 1965 “The concept of organization.” Social Research 32:239–258.
Cicourel, Aaron V. 1968 The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: John Wiley.
Garfinkel, Harold 1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Gerth, Hans and C. Wright Mills 1953 Character and Social Structure: The Psychology of Social Institutions. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Goffman, Erving 1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
Hewitt, John P. and Peter M. Hall 1973 “Social problems, problematic situations and quasi-theories.” American Sociological Review 38:367–374.
Hewitt, John P. and Randall Stokes 1975 “Disclaimers.” American Sociological Review 40:1–11.
Leiter, Kenneth 1980 A Primer on Ethnomethodology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Manning, Peter K. 1970 “Talking and becoming: A view of organizational socialization.” Pp. 239–256 in T. D. Douglas (ed.), Understanding Everyday Life. Chicago: Aldine.
Mills, C. Wright 1940 “Situated actions and vocabularies of motive.” American Sociological Review 5:904–913.
Page, Charles H. 1946 “Bureaucracy's other fare.” Social Forces 25:88–94.
Perinbanayagam, R. S. 1977 “The structure of motives.” Symbolic Interaction 1:104–120.
Phillipson, Michael 1972 “Phenomenological philosophy and sociology.” Pp. 119–163 in P. Filmer, M. Phillipson, D. Silverman, and D. Walsh (eds.), New Directions in Sociological Theory. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
Scott, Marvin and Stanford Lyman 1968 “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33:46–62.
Stokes, Randall and John P. Hewitt 1976 “Aligning actions.” American Sociological Review 41:838–849.
Sudnow, David 1965 “Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defenders office.” Social Problems 12:255–272.
Wieder, D. Lawrence 1974 Language and Social Reality: The Case of Telling the Convict Code. The Hague: Mouton.
Zimmerman, Don H. 1970 “The practicalities of rule use.” Pp. 221–238 in J. D. Douglas (ed.), Understanding Everyday Life. Chicago: Aldine.
Zimmerman, Don H. and Melvin Pollner 1970 “The everyday world as a phenomenon.” Pp. 80–103 in J. D. Douglas (ed.), Understanding Everyday Life. Chicago: Aldine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier draft of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Sociological Society, Knoxville, Tennessee, March, 1980. We would like to thank Michael Hughes and James Michaels for abetting suggestions and comments. The authors share equal responsibility for the paper; the names have been listed alphabetically.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Askins, R.L., Carter, T.J. & Wood, M. Rule enforcement in a public setting: The case of basketball officiating. Qual Sociol 4, 87–101 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987213
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987213