Abstract
Undergraduate subjects were seen to accurately discriminate between simulating actors and genuinely disabled males confined to wheelchairs. Judgments were based on skill in manipulating the wheelchair, poorer muscular development of the disabled, and on appearance of clothing. Implications for research on the disabled employing actors was discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belgrave, F. Z. & Mills, J. Effect upon desire for social interaction with a physically disabled person of mentioning the disability in different contexts.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1981,11, 44–57.
Commer, R. J. & Piliavin, J. A. The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interaction.Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 1972,23, 33–39.
Farina, A., Sherman, M. & Allen, J. G. Role of physical abnormalities in interpersonal perception and behavior.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1968,73, 590–593.
Katz, I.Stigma: A social psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1981.
Kleck, R. Physical stigma and nonverbal cues emitted in face-to-face interaction.Human Relations, 1968,21, 19–28.
Kleck, R. Physical stigma and task oriented interactions.Human Relations, 1969,22, 53–60.
Kleck, R., Ono, H. & Hastorf, A. H. The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interaction.Human Relations, 1966,19, 425–436.
Langer, E. J., Fiske, S., Taylor, S. E., & Chanowitz, B. Stigma, staring, and discomfort: a novelstimulus hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976,12, 451–463.
Levitt, L. & Kornhaber, R. C. Stigma and compliance: A re-examination.Journal of Social Psychology, 1977,103, 13–18.
Pomazal, R. J. & Clore, G. L.Helping on the highway: The effects of dependency and sex.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973,3, 150–164.
Snyder, M. L., Kleck, R. E., Strenta, A. & Mentzer, S. J. Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional amgibuity analysis. analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979,37, 2297–2306.
Worthington, M. E. Personal space as a function of the stigma effect.Environment and Behavior, 1974,6, 289–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported by a grant from the York University Faculty of Arts awarded to the first two authors. The project was performed as the third author's Honours thesis. The authors wish to thank all participants for their cooperation and assistance in making this research possible. The authors also wish to thank Gail Kenyon, Coordinator of the Centre for Handicapped Students who helped recruit participants for the videotaping and to Lucie Cantrell, Executive Officer of the York University Counselling and Development Centre who arranged for the use of the Centre's facilities and equipment.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wiesenthal, D.L., Theodor, L.H. & Hurford, D.E. Nonverbal cues employed in discriminating between disabled persons and actors. J Nonverbal Behav 7, 117–120 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986873
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986873