Skip to main content
Log in

Nonverbal cues employed in discriminating between disabled persons and actors

  • Notes In Brief
  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Undergraduate subjects were seen to accurately discriminate between simulating actors and genuinely disabled males confined to wheelchairs. Judgments were based on skill in manipulating the wheelchair, poorer muscular development of the disabled, and on appearance of clothing. Implications for research on the disabled employing actors was discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belgrave, F. Z. & Mills, J. Effect upon desire for social interaction with a physically disabled person of mentioning the disability in different contexts.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1981,11, 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commer, R. J. & Piliavin, J. A. The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interaction.Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 1972,23, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A., Sherman, M. & Allen, J. G. Role of physical abnormalities in interpersonal perception and behavior.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1968,73, 590–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, I.Stigma: A social psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleck, R. Physical stigma and nonverbal cues emitted in face-to-face interaction.Human Relations, 1968,21, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleck, R. Physical stigma and task oriented interactions.Human Relations, 1969,22, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleck, R., Ono, H. & Hastorf, A. H. The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interaction.Human Relations, 1966,19, 425–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J., Fiske, S., Taylor, S. E., & Chanowitz, B. Stigma, staring, and discomfort: a novelstimulus hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976,12, 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, L. & Kornhaber, R. C. Stigma and compliance: A re-examination.Journal of Social Psychology, 1977,103, 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomazal, R. J. & Clore, G. L.Helping on the highway: The effects of dependency and sex.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973,3, 150–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. L., Kleck, R. E., Strenta, A. & Mentzer, S. J. Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional amgibuity analysis. analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979,37, 2297–2306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, M. E. Personal space as a function of the stigma effect.Environment and Behavior, 1974,6, 289–294.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant from the York University Faculty of Arts awarded to the first two authors. The project was performed as the third author's Honours thesis. The authors wish to thank all participants for their cooperation and assistance in making this research possible. The authors also wish to thank Gail Kenyon, Coordinator of the Centre for Handicapped Students who helped recruit participants for the videotaping and to Lucie Cantrell, Executive Officer of the York University Counselling and Development Centre who arranged for the use of the Centre's facilities and equipment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiesenthal, D.L., Theodor, L.H. & Hurford, D.E. Nonverbal cues employed in discriminating between disabled persons and actors. J Nonverbal Behav 7, 117–120 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986873

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986873

Keywords

Navigation