Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular phylogenetics of the tribeInuleae s. str.(Asteraceae), based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of 18S–26S nrDNA for a sample of 16 taxa from theInuleae s. str. and two outgroup taxa are analysed cladistically with PAUP. A consensus tree of the four most parsimonious cladograms is presented. Three different tests of cladogram stability are conducted (Bremer support, parsimony jackknifing and bootstrapping); all tests indicate a high degree of support for the basal nodes of the tree. The ITS phylogeny of the tribe is compared with previous hypotheses based on morphological data. The position ofAnisopappus as sister group to the rest of the tribe is supported by the molecular data, but the proposed subdivision ofInuleae s. str. into a paleate grade group and an epaleate clade is not. The interpretation of the character evolution of, e.g. receptacular paleae and pappus features within the tribe is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderberg, A. A., 1989: Phylogeny and reclassification of the tribeInuleae (Asteraceae). — Canad. J. Bot.67: 2277–2296.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991a: Taxonomy and phylogeny of the tribeGnaphalieae (Asteraceae). — Opera Bot.104: 1–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991b: Taxonomy and phylogeny of the tribeInuleae (Asteraceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.176: 75–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1991c: Taxonomy and phylogeny of the tribePlucheeae (Asteraceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.176: 145–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994: TribeInuleae. — InBremer, K.:Asteraceae, cladistics & classification, pp. 273–291. — Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, B. G., 1992: Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from theCompositae. — Molec. Phylogenet. Evol.1: 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1993: Molecular phylogenetics ofCalycadenia (Compositae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: chromosomal and morphological evolution reexamined. — Amer. J. Bot.80: 222–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995: The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on Angiosperm phylogeny. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.82: 247–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, K., 1987: Tribal interrelationships of theAsteraceae. — Cladistics3: 210–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1988: The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. — Evolution42: 795–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994a:Asteraceae, cladistics & classification. — Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1994b: Branch support and tree stability. — Cladistics10: 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J. M., 1988: Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious cladograms. — Cladistics4: 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M. W., Hills, H. H., 1991: Silica gel: An ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. — Taxon40: 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J., Doyle, J. S., 1987: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. — Phytochem. Bull.19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldenäs, P. K., Anderberg, A. A., 1996: A cladistic analysis ofAnisopappus (Asteraceae:Inuleae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.199: 167–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, T., Wikström, N., 1995: AutoDecay ver. 3.0. — Stockholm: Computer program distributed by the authors, Botaniska Institutionen, Stockholm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, J. S., Albert, V. A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D., Kluge, A. G., 1996: Parsimony jack-knifing outperforms neighbor-joining. — Cladistics12: 11–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J., 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. — Evolution39: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goloboff, P. A., 1991: Homoplasy and the choice among cladograms. — Cladistics7: 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, I. L., Sylvester, J. E., Smith, T. F., Stambolian, D., Schmickel, R. D., 1990: Ribosomal RNA gene sequences and hominid phylogeny. — Molec. Biol. Evol.7: 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, D. M., Bull, J. J., 1993: An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. — Syst. Biol.42: 182–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, O., 1890:Compositae. —Engler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien4(5), pp. 87–387. — Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karis, P. O., 1993: Morphological phylogenetics of theAsteraceae-Asteroideae, with notes on character evolution. — Pl. Syst. Evol.186: 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1992: Phylogenetic analysis of theCichorioideae (Asteraceae), with emphasis on theMutisieae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79: 416–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., Jansen, R. J., Wallace, R. S., Michaels, H. J., Palmer, J. D., 1992: Phylogenetic implications ofrbcL sequence variation in theAsteraceae. — Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.79: 428–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1995:ndhF sequence evolution and the major clades in the sunflower family. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92: 10379–10383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Källersjö, M., Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. G., Bult, C., 1992: Skewness and permutation. — Cladistics8: 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. B., Taylor, J. W., 1992: Phylogeny of five fungus-like protoctistan (Phytophthora) species, inferred from the internal transcribed spacers of ribosomal DNA. — Molec. Biol. Evol.9: 636–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P., Maddison, D. R., 1992: MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, ver. 3.0. — Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merxmüller, H., Leins, P., Roessler, H., 1977:Inuleae — systematic review. — InHeywood, V. H., Harborne, J. B., Turner, B. L., (Eds): The biology and chemistry of theCompositae, pp. 577–602. — London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saghai-Maroof, M. A., Soliman, K. M., Jorgensen, R. A., Allard, R. W., 1984: Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. — Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA81: 8014–8018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L., 1993: PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, ver. 3.1.1. Computer program. — Champaign, Illinois: Illinois Natural History Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., Gibson, T. J., 1994: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties an weight matrix choice. — Nucl. Acids Res.22: 4673–4680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman, J. W. H., 1993: Randomization confounded: a response toCarpenter. — Cladistics9: 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, A., 1987: The genusNauplius (Asteraceae-Inuleae). — Nordic J. Bot.7: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokota, Y., Kawata, T., Iida, Y., Kato, A., Tanifuji, S., 1989: Nucleotide sequences of the 5.8S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer regions in carrot and broad bean ribosomal DNA. — J. Molec. Evol.29: 294–301.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eldenäs, P., Anderberg, A.A. & Källersjö, M. Molecular phylogenetics of the tribeInuleae s. str.(Asteraceae), based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Pl Syst Evol 210, 159–173 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985666

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985666

Key words

Navigation