Skip to main content
Log in

A monograph ofAgathis

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This first study of the whole genusAgathis makes use of recent local revisions of the New Caledonian and Australian species which are all maintained. The male cone is shown to have most of the taxonomically useful variation, and this confirms the findings of two partial revisions centred on Indonesian species. Thirteen species are recognized, two of which have two subspecies. New Caledonia has five, and Australia three, sympatric species. Otherwise the species are allopatric except for a few populations of central MalesianA. dammara within the range of west MalesianA. borneensis. One of these montane populations is the distinctiveA. dammara subsp.flavescens of Malaya, formerly a full species.

Two groups and three individually distinctive species can be recognized on microsporophyll characters. The larger, group B, comprizes eight species,A. australis (New Zealand),A. corbassonii, A. lanceolata andA. montana (New Caledonia),A. macrophylla (Melanesian islands and includingA. obtusa andA. vitiensis),A. atropurpurea (Australia),A. dammara (mainly central Malesia) andA. borneensis (west Malesia); both the last have long synonymies. The smaller species, group (A), comprizesA. microstachya (Australia) andA. labillardieri (west New Guinea and the Sepik basin). The individually distinctive species areA. moorei andA. ovata of New Caledonia andA. robusta of Australia with its new subspeciesnesophila, described here, of eastern New Guinea and New Britain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, H. H., 1961: Flora of New Zealand. — Wellington Govt. Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhuizen van den Brink, R. C., 1955: Nomenclatural notes onDammara Lmk. andAgathis Salisb. — Taxon4, 195–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman, R. B., Marty, R. A., 1970: Diterpenoids XXIV. A survey of theAgathis species of north Queensland. Two new resin acids. — Austral. J. Chem.23, 1457–1464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheeseman, T. F. L., 1906: Manual of the New Zealand Flora. — Auckland: Govt. Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Laubenfels, D. J., 1969: Diagnoses de nouvelles espèces d'Araucariacées de Nouvelle Calédonie. — Trav. Lab. For. Toulouse1, 8, 5, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1972: Gymnospermes. Flore de la Nouvelle Calédonie et Dépendances4, 1–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Laubenfels, D. J., 1978: The Moluccan damars (Agathis, Araucariaceae). — Blumea24, 499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, B. P. M., 1978: A revision of the genusAgathis (Araucariaceae) in Australia. — Brunonia1, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer Drees, E., 1940: The genusAgathis in Malaysia. — Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenzorg Sèr. 3,16, 455–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilieva, G. V., 1972: Materials on the comparative anatomy of leaf in speciesAgathis Salisb. (Araucariaceae). — Bot. Ž.57, 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburg, D., 1900:Coniferae, Araucariinae. — Monsunia1, 182–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, T. C., 1966: Guide to the forests of the Solomon Islands. — London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1977: A first look atAgathis. — Trop. For. Papers11.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitmore, T.C. A monograph ofAgathis . Pl Syst Evol 135, 41–69 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983006

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00983006

Key words

Navigation