Abstract
This article expands and extends the analysis of data previously reported in a study of the education deanship. The data were collected from national samples of deans, central administrators, department chairpersons, and faculty. Multivariate statistical procedures used were factor analysis with rotations, multivariate analysis of variance, and canonical discriminant analysis. The purposes of the retreatment of the data were to: (1) identify factors that were produced from the responses and compare them with the semantic “factors” described in the original analysis; (2) compare differences among respondent groups; and (3) assess commonality of responses within each group. New and unique factors, relationships, and group differences were found. Perceptions and acceptances of the dean's role were not uniform, with department chairpersons being the most heterogeneous.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.Directory 1976. Washington, D.C.: The Association, 1976.
Armor, D. J. Theta reliability and factor scaling. In H. L. Costner (Ed.),Sociological Methodology: 1973–1974. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc., 1974.
Bailey, D. The academic department. In G. E. Budig (Ed.),Perceptions in Public Higher Education. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 1970.
Brann, J. The chairman: an impossible job about to become tougher. In Brann and Emmet (Eds.),The Academic Department or Division Chairman: A Complex Role. Detroit: Balamp Publishing, 1972.
Clark, D. L. and Guba, E. G.Contextual factors affecting individual and institutional behavior in schools, colleges, and departments of education. Occasional Papers Series, Indiana University. Research on Institutions of Teacher Education, 1976.
Cyphert, F. R. and Zimpher, N. L.The education deanship: who is the dean? Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, 1976.
Dejnozka, E. L. The dean of education: a study of selected role norms.Journal of Teacher Education. In press.
--The Dean of Education—A Study of Selected Role Norms. Unpublished preliminary report, the University of Nebraska at Omaha, 1977.
Foskett, J. M.The Normative World of the Elementary School Principal. Eugene, Oregon: The Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, 1967.
Foskett, J. M. and Wolcott, H. F. Self-images and community-images of the elementary school principal.Educational Administration Quarterly, 3 (Spring) 1967.
Getzells, J. W. Administration as a social process. In A. W. Helpin (Ed.),Administrative Theory in Education. New York: Macmillan, 1958.
Guba, E. G. and Clark, D. L.Likely near-future scenarios for schools, colleges, and departments of education. Occasional Papers Series, Indiana University. Research on Institutions of Teacher Education. 1977.
—— Are schools education languishing?New York University Education Quarterly, 1979,2 9–16.
National Educational Resources, Inc.Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance, covariance, and regression. Ann Arbor: National Educational Resources, Inc., 1972.
Nie, N., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, L., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H.Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
Tatsuoka, M. M.Multivariate analysis: techniques for educational and psychological research. New York: Wiley, 1971.
Terenzini, P. T. and Pascarella, E. T. An assessment of the construct validity of the clark-trow typolpogy of college student subcultures.American Educational Research Journal, 1977,14 (3), 225–248.
Wisniewski, R.The dean of education and the looking-glass self. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Society of Professors of Education, Chicago, March 2, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kapel, D.E., Dejnozka, E.L. The education deanship: A further analysis. Res High Educ 10, 99–112 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976223
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976223