Skip to main content
Log in

Some effects of training on teaching effectiveness of untrained university teaching assistants

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an assessment of the effects which a brief training program had on teaching effectiveness of graduate teaching assistants (TAs). Twenty-two inexperienced and previously untrained university TAs from economics, geography, and business administration were assigned to a training or control group by a stratified random method with stratification based on TA departmental affiliation. Teaching experts rated two videotapes of each Ta's university class, one tape made before training and one following training. Ratings were obtained on two factors: (1) planning instruction to meet clear goals and organizing meaningful content in a logical fashion, and (2) involving students in instruction. Results from analyses of covariance indicate that the training group received significantly higher final ratings than the control group on the total score and on each of the two factors when final scores were adjusted for group differences in initial ratings. Teaching experience alone did not result in significantly higher ratings for control group TAs. Participants in training evaluated most topics and the overall program favorably both immediately after training and one semester later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. E., and Faust, F. W.Educational psychology: the science of instruction and learning. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., and Schön, D. A.Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubertine, H. E., and Johnson, W. D. Teacher performance appraisal scale. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Teaching Techniques Laboratory.

  • Carroll, J. G. Effects of training programs for university teaching assistants: a review of empirical research.The Journal of Higher Education 1980,51 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgaard, K. A. Some effects of training on teaching effectiveness of untrained university teaching assistants.Dissertation Abstracts International, 1977,37, 6416–17A. University Microfilm #77-8968.

  • Goodwin, S. S. A comparison of the effectiveness of indirect and direct supervision on student teachers during microteaching. Unpublished Master of Science thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1977.

  • Gronlund, N. E.Stating behavioral objectives for classroom instruction. New York: Macmillan, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund, N. E. Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: Macmillan, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. D. Supervision based on time-lapse protocols. Unpublished research report, University of Colorado College of Education, 1966.

  • Johnson, W. D. An analysis of the teacher performance appraisal scale. Unpublished research report, University of Illinois Teaching Techniques Laboratory, 1973.

  • Maxwell, M.Improving student learning skills. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalgaard, K.A. Some effects of training on teaching effectiveness of untrained university teaching assistants. Res High Educ 17, 39–50 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973662

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973662

Keywords

Navigation