Abstract
The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it provides an historical overview of studies of risk, risk perception, and decision making under risk within the genetic counseling domain. Second, it proposes an alternative conceptualization and operationalization for the study of risk perception. The conceptualization involves probability, adversity, incompleteness, and ambiguity. Prior studies of risk perception focus on the recurrence risk and operationalize risk perception by asking for interpretations of the magnitude of the probability of the outcome. Their focus is on the probability of a particular outcome. We formulate the problem in terms of a gamble and suggest that risk perception be operationalized in terms of the riskiness of the gamble. Our focus is on the riskiness of a decision option which entails two or more outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Black RB (1979). The effects of diagnostic uncertainty and available options on perceptions of risk.BD:OAS XXV(5C):341–354.
Carter CO, Evans KA, Fraser Roberts JA, Buck AR (1971). Genetic clinic: A follow-up.Lancet 1:281–285.
Chase GA, Faden RR, Holtzman NA, Chwalow AJ, Leonard CO, Lopes C, Quaid K (1986). Assessment of risk by pregnant women: Implications for genetic counseling and education.Soc Biol 33:57–64.
Denayer L, Evers-Kiebooms G, De Boeck K, Van den Berghe H (1992). Reproductive decision making of aunts and uncles of a child with cystic fibrosis: Genetic risk perception and attitudes toward carrier identification and prenatal diagnosis.Am J Med Genet 44:104–111.
Edwards AWF (1989). Probability and likelihood in genetic counseling.Clin Genet 36:209–216.
Ekwo EE, Seals BF, Kim J-O, Williamson RA, Hanson JW (1985). Factors influencing maternal estimates of genetic risk.Am J Med Genet 20:491–504.
Emery AEH, Watt MS, Clack E (1972). The effects of genetic counselling in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Clin Genet 3:147–150.
Emery AEH, Watt MS, Clack E (1973). Social effects of genetic counselling.Br Med J 1:724–726.
Emery AEH, Raeburn JA, Skinner R, Holloway S, Lewis P (1979). Prospective study of genetic counselling.Br Med J 1:1253–1256.
Evers-Kiebooms G (1987). Decision making in Huntington's disease and cystic fibrosis.BD:OAS XXIII(2):115–149.
Faden RR, Chwalow AJ, Quaid K, Chase GA, Lopes C, Leonard CO, Holtzman NA (1987). Prenatal screening and pregnant women's attitudes toward the abortion of defective fetuses.AJPH 77:288–290.
Fishburn PC (1984). Foundations of risk measurement. I. Risk as probable loss.Management Sci 30:396–406.
Fraser FC (1970). Counseling in genetics: Its intent and scope.BD:OAS VI(1):7–12.
Frets PG, Niermeijer MF (1990). Reproductive planning after genetic counselling: a perspective from the last decade.Clin Genet 38:295–306.
Frets PG, Duivenvoorden HJ, Verhage F, Ketzer E, Niermeijer MF (1990a). Model identifying the reproductive decision after genetic counseling.Am J Med Genet 35:503–509.
Frets PG, Duivenvoorden HJ, Verhage F, Niermeijer MF, van den Berge SMM, Galjaard H (1990b). Factors influencing the reproductive decision after genetic counseling.Am J Med Genet 35:496–502.
Fullwood RR, Hall RE (1988).Probabilistic Risk Assessment in the Nuclear Power Industry: Fundaments and Applications. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Godmilow L, Hirschhorn K (1977). Evaluation of genetic counseling. In: Lubs HA, de la Cruz F (eds.)Genetic Counseling New York: Raven Press, pp 121–128.
Hsia YE (1974). Choosing my children's genes: Genetic counseling. In: Lipkin M, Rowley PT (eds.)Genetic Responsibility New York: Plenum Press, pp 43–59.
Humphreys P, Berkeley D (1987). Representing risks: Supporting genetic counseling.BD:OAS XXIII(2):227–250.
Hutton EM, Thompson MW (1976). Carrier detection and genetic counselling in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A follow-up study.Can Med Assoc J 115:749–752.
Ives EJ, Peterson PM, Cardwell SE (1973). Genetic counseling: How does it affect procreative decisions?Hosp Pract 8:52–61.
Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.Econometrica 47:263–291.
Kaplan G, Garrick BJ (1981). The quantitative definition of risk.Risk Anal 1:11–27.
Kessler S (1980). The psychological paradigm shift in genetic counseling.Soc Biol 27:167–185.
Kessler S, Levine EK (1987). Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. IV. The subjective assessment of probability.Am J Med Genet 28:361–370.
Klayman J, Schoemaker PJH (1993). Thinking about the future: A cognitive perspective.J Forecasting 12:161–186.
Leonard CO, Chase GA, Childs B (1972). Genetic counseling: A consumer's view.NEJM 287:433–439.
Levine C (1979). Genetic counseling: The client's viewpoint.BD:OAS XV(2):123–135.
Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979a). Genetic counseling: Provision and reception of information.Am J Med Genet 3:113–127.
Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979b). Genetic counseling — The postcounseling period: I. Parents' perceptions of uncertainty.Am J Med Genet 4:51–71.
Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979c). Genetic counseling — The postcounseling period: II. Making reproductive choices.Am J Med Genet 4:73–87.
Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979d). Genetic counseling: Parents' responses to uncertainty.BD:OAS XV(5C):325–339.
Lopes LL (1987). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk.Adv Exp Soc Psychol 20:255–295.
Lowrance WW (1976).Of Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety. Los Altose, CA: William Kaufmann.
Lubs M-L (1979). Does genetic counseling influence risk attitudes and decision making?BD:OAS XV(SC):355–367.
Morris W (ed.). (1980).The American Heritage Dictionary. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, p 1121.
Pearn JH (1973). Patients' subjective interpretation of risks offered in genetic counselling.J Med Genet 10:129–134.
Reed SC (1977). A short history of genetic counseling.Soc Biol 21:332–339.
Reynolds BD, Puck MH, Robinson A (1974). Genetic counseling: An appraisal.Clin Genet 5:177–187.
Roberts JAF (1962). Genetic prognosis.Br Med J 1:587–592.
Schull WJ (1958). Discussion.Eugen Quart 1:53–62.
Shiloh S, Sagi M (1989). Effect of framing on the perception of genetic recurrence risks.Am J Med Genet 33:130–135.
Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1979). Rating the risks.Environment 21:14–20, 36–39.
Somer M, Mustonen H, Norio R (1988). Evaluation of genetic counseling: Recall of information, post-counseling reproduction, and attitude of the counselees.Clin Genet 34:352–365.
Sorenson JR (1993). Genetic counseling: Values that have mattered. In: Bartels DM, LeRoy BS, Caplan AL (eds.),Prescribing Our Future: Ethical Challenges in Genetic Counseling. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp 3–14.
Sultz HA, Schlesinger ER, Feldman J (1972). An epidemiologic justification for genetic counseling in family planning.AJPH 62:1489–1492.
Swerts A (1987). Impact of genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome and neural tube defects.BD:OAS XXIII(2):61–83.
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science 185:1124–1131.
Vlek C (1987). Risk assessment, risk perception and decision making about courses of action involving genetic risk: An overview of concepts and methods.BD:OAS XXIII(2):171–207.
von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947).Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (2nd Ed.). Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Weber EU (1988). A descriptive measure of risk.Acta Psychol 69:185–203.
Weber EU, Bottom WP (1989). Axiomatic measure of perceived risk: Some tests and extensions.J Behav Dec Mak 2:113–131.
Wertz DC, Sorenson JR, Heeren TC (1986). Clients' interpretation of risks provided in genetic counseling.Am J Hum Genet 39:253–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palmer, C.G.S., Sainfort, F. Toward a new conceptualization and operationalization of risk perception within the genetic counseling domain. J Genet Counsel 2, 275–294 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961576
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00961576